Started By
Message

re: Govt tells Christian ministers: Perform same-sex weddings or face jail, fines

Posted on 10/20/14 at 9:52 am to
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 9:52 am to
quote:

How are there women deacons (who can do almost everything that a priest can do except confect the Eucharist) in the Catholic Church?


The requirements for a deacon are far more loosely described than the requirements for an elder or minister, fwiw. Though culture undeniably plays a role in the influence of women in the modern church.

To the OP: I don't care if a chapel is owned privately and for profit, they should be able to restrict marriages on their property to heterosexual marriage.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 9:52 am to
I just acknowledged that they do. Ordained minister doesn't mean anything anymore.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 9:53 am to
Sure it does. You can pretend that it doesn't because of the stupid internet churches, but it certainly does.
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 9:55 am to
quote:

They should force the Muslims to marry same sex.



I can't wait to see the shitstorm that the two politically correct factions would bring.

I don't think it would happen any time soon, though. Gays want to force Christians to do their bidding. They don't give a shite about forcing muslims to "accept" them.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 9:55 am to
But that's the thing. An internet church, or some guy who sits at home and becomes an "ordained minister" on his computer, shouldn't be treated as a Catholic Priest or someone who attended a seminary and presides over a Protestant congregation.

ETA: If we're going to provide special legal protections for ministers and their churches and congregations, the ordination of those ministers needs to actually mean something.
This post was edited on 10/20/14 at 9:58 am
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89480 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 9:57 am to
quote:

And I doubt any judge would force a minister to perform a gay wedding...


Would you vocally oppose such efforts to do so?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 9:57 am to
But there's a whole range in between. There's people who have done online classes, there's people who have done apprenticeships, there's people who are simply devout people who are filling in at a small country church and the church has ordained them. Is it just the internet guy who doesn't count?
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:00 am to
Yes he should if the religion on which he is ordained has a conflict with a certain law. The same strict scrutiny test would apply,
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:00 am to
quote:

But there's a whole range in between. There's people who have done online classes, there's people who have done apprenticeships, there's people who are simply devout people who are filling in at a small country church and the church has ordained them. Is it just the internet guy who doesn't count?
I don't know what the solution is. Part of it is just me being tired of seeing an 8 year old in some article or on tv and everyone's celebrating that he's an "ordained minister", like that doesn't devalue the title tremendously.

It'd be a lot simpler if we didn't bother with the ordained minister titles, and just protected the religious institutions. Offer no protection specifically for religious businesses, and just let them do what they want to do. If they want to serve you, cool. If not, don't force them.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:01 am to
Yes but I doubt anyone would care.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:02 am to
quote:

If we're going to provide special legal protections for ministers and their churches and congregations, the ordination of those ministers needs to actually mean something.


frick that. The freedom of the press doesn't only apply to someone with an official AP badge.
This post was edited on 10/20/14 at 10:03 am
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:03 am to
quote:

frick that. The freedom of the press doesn't only apply to someone with an official AP badge.
That's why I'm saying we don't bother caring if they're ordained ministers or not. Just protect every religious group, period.

Let it be the church's protection, not the individuals.
This post was edited on 10/20/14 at 10:04 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123779 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:03 am to
quote:

I don't trust the source
quote:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF IDAHO

Case No. 2:14-cv-441-REB
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

DONALD KNAPP; EVELYN KNAPP;
HITCHING POST WEDDINGS, LLC,
Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF COEUR D'ALENE,
Defendant.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:05 am to
What we're seeing, and some of us already knew this, is that this will never end. This organized movement stopped being solely about gay rights a long time ago. It's now every bit as much about harassing and, hopefully, destroying organized religion....i.e. Christianity.

I laugh everytime I see that anti-bullying PSA on TV, because these days you can't tell who the bullies are. The script has been flipped.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:07 am to
A question for anyone. Does a person of faith performing weddings have to be licensed by some branch of government for that marriage to be lawful?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123779 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:15 am to
quote:

This isn't a church.
It is an establishment of religion.
quote:

And I doubt any judge would force a minister to perform a gay wedding... And that's what we said.
So we've migrated from discussions you and I have had where this would """never""" happen, to the point you """doubt""" a judge would force a minister to perform a religious service against his will.

This comes on the heels of Houston.
Now I've sustained quite a bit of criticism in saying going after churches was always the intended "next-shoe-to-drop". It's the activist goal. It has been the goal. I suspect there are folks here who know that. As late as this week, ballcaster was dismissive of the suggestion.

Yet here we are, and earlier than I expected frankly.



This post was edited on 10/20/14 at 10:18 am
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:15 am to
No, not typically. Some states require a license to marry people, but those are usually pretty perfunctory licenses. Fill out the paperwork, pay your $25 and get licensed.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:17 am to
quote:

What we're seeing, and some of us already knew this, is that this will never end. This organized movement stopped being solely about gay rights a long time ago. It's now every bit as much about harassing and, hopefully, destroying organized religion....i.e. Christianity. I laugh everytime I see that anti-bullying PSA on TV, because these days you can't tell who the bullies are. The script has been flipped.


No one is doing what you claim. A city attorney is not a prosecutor nor is he a policeman. He has no power to force them to have gay weddings plus there isn't anyone asking for a gay wedding. He was asked his opinion and he gave it and it included the phrase "in theory".

If the courts have ruled the govt cannot force hobby lobby to provide contraceptions in the employee health insurance, they certainly won't force a hobby lobby chapel to perform gay weddings.

But continue with your faux outrage. I know it must be frustrating for you considering no one has died in the US from Ebola since Duncan.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Some states require a license to marry people


So then there is a connection between government and religion in those states. Hmmm.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123779 posts
Posted on 10/20/14 at 10:24 am to
quote:

No one is doing what you claim
Well it will be interesting hearing the inevitable scores of pro-FirstAmendment gays going after the city attorney for his stupidity. < /sarcasm >
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram