- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Michelle's lunch program - bon apetite
Posted on 10/17/14 at 9:50 am to FT
Posted on 10/17/14 at 9:50 am to FT
quote:We could make them run on treadmills to power our cities. They lose weight and we have clean, renewable energy.
The poor houses, or the treadmill. Or perhaps they should die, then, and decrease the surplus population.
Win-win.
1
Posted on 10/17/14 at 9:51 am to Scruffy
Maybe we could turn them into tires. That way, we still have poor people, but we can use them for our cars.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 9:52 am to FT
quote:Yea, but tires eventually give out and I don't think we can replenish the poor population fast enough to account for tire blowouts.
Maybe we could turn them into tires. That way, we still have poor people, but we can use them for our cars.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 9:54 am to Scruffy
quote:
What about the poor people who can't afford a sandwich, apple, or Twinkie and rely solely on the schools to feed their kids lunch?
Have them shoplift skittles.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 9:54 am to Scruffy
quote:Damn. It's renewable, just not infinite. But the poor people on the treadmills would die eventually, too.
Yea, but tires eventually give out and I don't think we can replenish the poor population fast enough to account for tire blowouts.
Maybe we like breed them as well as doing the tire and treadmill thing.
I'm for an all of the above approach.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 9:56 am to Vegas Bengal
quote:That doesn't have enough nutritious value.
Have them shoplift skittles.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 9:57 am to Scruffy
They don't count as a serving of fruit?
Posted on 10/17/14 at 9:59 am to FT
Posted on 10/17/14 at 9:59 am to the808bass
quote:700-850 cal limit for a 17 year old boy is about as stupid as stupid gets. Especially if the kid is expected to play sports on that. It is clear as day she doesnt follow her own damn diet. If she ate 400 cals for breakfast, 800 for lunch, and 750 for dinner she would actually not be a pudgy arse
There's a kcal limit per meal of 850
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:00 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
TigerFanatic99
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:04 am to FT
quote:Dude, we aren't talking about Starbursts.
They don't count as a serving of fruit?
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:05 am to lsupride87
quote:
would actually not be a pudgy arse
Pics?
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:09 am to the808bass
quote:We're trying to have a serious discussion and this guy decides to go all OT.
Pics?
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:10 am to FT
My bad
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:13 am to the808bass
quote:It's cool, brah.
My bad
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:13 am to the808bass
quote:if u feed them high cal crap like potato salad maybe.
There's a kcal limit per meal of 850. That's obviously going to put a pretty strict upper limit on portions.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:22 am to lsupride87
quote:
700-850 cal limit for a 17 year old boy is about as stupid as stupid gets.
How many calories per meal do you think the average 17 year old boy should get?
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:23 am to bamarep
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:26 am to mouton
An active teen boy could easily require ~1100 calories per meal.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:29 am to the808bass
Most won't.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News