Started By
Message

re: Guardians of Galaxy passes Man of Steel's worldwide take

Posted on 10/14/14 at 7:26 am to
Posted by schexyoung
Deaf Valley
Member since May 2008
6534 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 7:26 am to
I really enjoyed MOS. I also think Superman killing at then end was necessary for Clark to become the Superman we know.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 7:33 am to
I'm still confused about why him killing at the end was a big deal to some. He kills the exact same villain at the end of Superman 2 after he is no longer a threat.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 8:22 am to
quote:

He kills the exact same villain at the end of Superman 2 after he is no longer a threat.


And shows no remorse, and is kind of a douche about it.

With all its flaws, and MoS certainly had many, I still really enjoy it and have found myself watching it in bits and pieces while on cable. Plenty of it was SO right that, at least for me, makes up for what they got wrong. Not everyone agrees, obviously.

That being said, GotG was one of the best times I've ever had at the movies.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37263 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 8:42 am to
quote:

You just can't let it go.


Naaa, it's not about that.

But when someone asks

quote:

I don't understand how a completely unknown property surpassed it.


I'm trying to throw my two cents in and maybe answer the question. I'd admit I'm shocked as well at how much money Guardians has made, at least if you look back to a few years ago and say "A Guardians of the Galaxy movie will out-gross a Superman movie," you'd probably be thrown in a looney bin, even with Marvel's early successes.

I don't think many people walked out of the theater saying, "Oooo, I should tell everyone to go see Superman." That's the ONLY thing that drove Guardians to it's numbers, an unknown property takes extreme word of mouth to be successful. For MoS's lack of success, part of that comes from a movie that didn't work. It was neither fun, like Guardians, nor powerful and meaningful, like TDK. It just kind of hung around the middle of those two, which was hard for anyone to really get excited for. That's all.

I mean, other folks can give an answer...?
This post was edited on 10/14/14 at 8:43 am
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37263 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 8:45 am to
quote:

DC is generally less humorous. Geoff Johns once said that DC characters are "gods" Marvel's are "guys off the street".


This is true, but if you make a serious film it has to make a point, to be meaningful, to creative a grand narrative, I think that's where MoS falls flat.

quote:

That being said, I agree with the preconceived notion about Superman. He actually kills all the time.

There is actually a little bit of symbolism in how MoS was seen by some. The general audience typically thinks Superman = Clark Kent=nerdy guy who doesn't get the girl, but as the audience we know the truth about ol' Clark. He's a god. We don't get how no one else around him-Lois,Perry,Lex,etc. can tell they are one and the same (I'm talking general Superman portrayals). It's kind of silly that glasses can fool them.

MoS actually sheds the "Clark" persona( not the name) to the audience and gives you Kal-El-Superman in his true form. The audience is actually fooled by the "Clark" persona. Clark didn't wear glasses until the end. He never put on that mask. Essentially Clark wasn't "Clark" to many. "Clark" would never behave like he did in the film.

As he is now integrated into the Daily Planet and his identity is at greater risk than ever-you'll probably see a little more "Clark" than in MoS.


Spot on.
This post was edited on 10/14/14 at 8:53 am
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112312 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:19 am to
i liked Man Of Steel better than most did (saw it atleast 2 times in the theaters) however GotG is a vastly superior movie
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37263 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:24 am to
quote:

i liked Man Of Steel better than most did (saw it atleast 2 times in the theaters) however GotG is a vastly superior movie


What's even funnier is that Guardians and Man of Steel have extremely similar arcs and themes running through them: Growing Up, Taking Responsibility, Father Issues, etc.

Guardians just puts them together in a more effective way.
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:27 am to
quote:

What's even funnier is that Guardians and Man of Steel have extremely similar arcs and themes running through them: Growing Up, Taking Responsibility, Father Issues, etc.



That's what makes Cap the best. All the problems in the world, yet is still the embodiment of high ideals.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37263 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:33 am to
quote:

That's what makes Cap the best. All the problems in the world, yet is still the embodiment of high ideals.


You said it, not me

(This is why I hate the "Captain America" is boring line.)
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115737 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:42 am to
quote:

I saw Man of Steel 3 times in the theater but have yet to see Guardians of the Galaxy. Man of Steel is one of my top 5 movies of any genre and favorite comic book movie. I don't understand how a completely unknown property surpassed it.



This is coming from someone who actually likes MoS: Guardians was a signficantly better movie. It was FUN. That's why.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:45 am to
:Should have been John Carter:
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51566 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:50 am to
It's always good to see supehero films doing so well, they've definitely come a long way. I personally loved both films, I think MOS gets a ridiculous amount of hate on here.

quote:

X-Men: Days of Future Past ($746 million).


this makes me happy, hopefully they keep making many more xmen films. They've always been my favorite superhero stories.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36040 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 11:18 am to
quote:

I don't understand how a completely unknown property surpassed it.


One is built for a larger audience and repeat viewings and the other isn't.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150707 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Man of Steel is one of my top 5 movies of any genre and favorite comic book movie

Wow. I was really pumped for MoS and saw it in theaters, and was completely disappointed by it. It was pretty bad IMO.

Put me in the "I saw MoS but not GotG" camp. I'll definitely check out GotG when it comes out on DVD.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 3:05 pm to
Good. Man of a steel was a miserable shite of a movie
Posted by TexasTiger34
Austin, Kind of
Member since Mar 2008
11338 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 4:49 pm to
GOG >>> MOS
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36040 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

DC is generally less humorous. Geoff Johns once said that DC characters are "gods" Marvel's are "guys off the street".


That is his opinion, which he unfortunately helped make into fact when he became one of the guys in charge. Both companies have gods and guys from the street. With a few exceptions, the humor has been drained from both companies. There was a time when Marvel fans dismissed DC for featuring humor and light heartedness in their superhero stories.

DC movies are dead-serious because of the current creators, not because of the characters.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37263 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

There was a time when Marvel fans dismissed DC for featuring humor and light heartedness in their superhero stories.


Yeah the emo-90s-Marvel run where anti-heroes Wolverine and Punisher took center stage. Spider-man lost his humor as well. I'd agree this was one of Marvel's weakest periods.
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 5:05 pm to
Yeah, basically when mutants were the focus of the MU. I had a subscriptions to The Avengers,Captain AmericaSpectacular Spider-ManDaredevilThe Punisher never the biggest X Men fan and particularly loathed X-Force at the time.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37263 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

Yeah, basically when mutants were the focus of the MU. I had a subscriptions to The Avengers,Captain AmericaSpectacular Spider-ManDaredevilThe Punisher never the biggest X Men fan and particularly loathed X-Force at the time.


I liked it at the time, because I was a teen in the mid-late 90's, but looking back, it's a lot of crap. Dark to be dark. Mean to be mean.


Curse you Rob Leifield!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram