Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Some good sports TV news: ESPN is losing subscribers

Posted on 10/11/14 at 9:44 pm
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 10/11/14 at 9:44 pm
quote:

Most of the biggest channels have lost between three million and five million subscribers since 2010. The two most expensive channels, which feature marquee sports events—Walt Disney Co.’s ESPN and Time Warner Inc.’s TNT—have been the hardest hit, with subscriber drops of nearly 5%. ESPN this year is expected to receive average monthly fees of $6.04 per subscriber, while TNT will receive $1.44, according to SNL Kagan.


quote:

Nielsen says the subscriber declines are a real phenomenon.



Screw ESPN
This post was edited on 10/11/14 at 9:45 pm
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51613 posts
Posted on 10/11/14 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

ESPN this year is expected to receive average monthly fees of $6.04 per subscriber


good lord
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51283 posts
Posted on 10/11/14 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

average monthly fees of $6.04 per subscriber


Greedy bastards.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82031 posts
Posted on 10/11/14 at 10:18 pm to
Ok
Posted by DrSteveBrule
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
12008 posts
Posted on 10/11/14 at 10:26 pm to
Without sports, most people wouldn't even have cable. It's a complete joke how expensive it is today with the internet being as powerful as it is.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139841 posts
Posted on 10/11/14 at 10:35 pm to
You clowns really think it's good for Disney to lose viewers?
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 10/11/14 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

You clowns really think it's good for Disney to lose viewers?



I think ESPN has too much influence over college sports.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141987 posts
Posted on 10/11/14 at 10:38 pm to
when ESPN fails, big time sports will go PPV
Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15520 posts
Posted on 10/11/14 at 10:40 pm to
Seems like ESPN is included in any TV package. This stat must include all ESPN peripheral services (News, U, Classics, etc.), which, doesn't really affect the brand, imo.
Posted by Hetfield
Dallas
Member since Jun 2013
7046 posts
Posted on 10/11/14 at 11:13 pm to
Karma. This is what happens when you try to make the news instead of report the news. I am still waiting on the apology & retraction for the 72 hour straight breaking news reporting in 2012 of the Mickey Loomis "wiretapping" allegations...............We are waiting ESPN...................Hello????
Posted by USAF Hart
My House
Member since Jun 2011
10273 posts
Posted on 10/11/14 at 11:23 pm to
The only reason I still have cable is because it would cost me roughly $300 to cancel my DirecTV contract. As soon as it's up, I am getting rid of it. I can watch live streams of my sports.
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 10/12/14 at 12:03 am to
I cut the cord. Happy as hell
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70906 posts
Posted on 10/12/14 at 12:05 am to
at people thinking this is good news.
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
40926 posts
Posted on 10/12/14 at 12:23 am to
Well it isn't bad news for people like myself who haven't had cable in 3 years.
Posted by TruckerDude
Shite Creek, ID
Member since Sep 2014
110 posts
Posted on 10/12/14 at 3:07 am to
quote:

when ESPN fails, big time sports will go PPV



Incorrect. Fox Sports and NBC Sports are waiting in the wings for those contracts to come due - with the subscriber rate falling that means the other two will have a little leverage against ESPN. I honestly try to limit the amount of time I watch them or use the espn3.com website - I definitely don't just put Sportscenter on as background noise or anything, which I'm sure is what accounts for a lot of SC's ratings.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47620 posts
Posted on 10/12/14 at 10:51 am to
A lot of the subscribers espn is losing are probably cutting cable in general, being as how we dont have a la carte yet
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19303 posts
Posted on 10/12/14 at 3:33 pm to
In reading the book "Inside ESPN", the tell all book bout how ESPN got started, it's amazing now to think that in its beginning, it had to pay the cable operators around the county to include it in their programing. Now it basically runs sports, college & pros especially & has so far been able to demand/get its fees as its suits deem necessary to its bottom line. It may not be good for sports, big picture, but it is nice to hear that Karma can still come into play occasionally.
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 10/12/14 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Incorrect. Fox Sports and NBC Sports are waiting in the wings for those contracts to come due - with the subscriber rate falling that means the other two will have a little leverage against ESPN


Yup - and to add to this: ESPN has gotten way too much into the editorial and away from the reporting that they used to do. People are tuning out because they don't want to be pitched the same freakin' narrative all day long. The product has declined, and has been in decline for about 7-8 years.

Need less: discussion about Roger Goodell / Ray Rice / BCS Sucks lets replace it with another flawed system / Redskins name

Them having less viewership is good for Fox and NBC; it's a zero-sum game.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119181 posts
Posted on 10/12/14 at 3:49 pm to
They need a changover in on air personalities.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram