- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
In the case of Typhoid Mary
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:26 pm
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:26 pm
quote:So while we are given all these positive, beyond a doubt assurances that it's totally safe and that ebola can't break loose in the United States, given this shining example of our first line of health care defenses in Dallas, what happens when they discover there is also perhaps an "Ebola Eric or Erica" out there who is asymptomatic but can carry the ebola pathogen and transfer it to unsuspecting persons? At the moment this is just a hypothetical question, but strange things have happened...
Mary Mallon (September 23, 1869 – November 11, 1938), better known as Typhoid Mary, was the first person in the United States identified as an asymptomatic carrier of the pathogen associated with typhoid fever. She was presumed to have infected 53 people, three of whom died, over the course of her career as a cook.[1] She was twice forcibly isolated by public health authorities and died after a total of nearly three decades in isolation.
LINK
This post was edited on 10/2/14 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:29 pm to JawjaTigah
Given that one disease involves a chronic carrier state and the other does not, this is probably the most useless comparison ever made on this board. Typhoid Mary infected so many others because she was a chronic carrier of salmonella typhi in her gallbladder and could pass the bacteria on through poor hygiene without having any symptoms herself.
Ebola is a viral infection that has a very distinct course. You either die from it, or your body "defeats" the virus and you are no longer infectious.
Ebola is a viral infection that has a very distinct course. You either die from it, or your body "defeats" the virus and you are no longer infectious.
This post was edited on 10/2/14 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:32 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:Maybe your attempt to rebut my hypothetical question is actually far more useless. I'm not persuaded by your certainty.
this is probably the most useless comparison ever made on this board.
quote:For instance, what is to say someone's particular metabolism is able to stretch out the full-blown infectious stage to a point where they are mostly functional and moving around among a wide variety of people - like at a school or a mall or a hospital. Sneezing, coughing, sweating, vomiting in the streets... but not rapidly dying. What do we really know for certain about this disease?
Ebola is a viral infection that has a very distinct course. You either die from it, or your body "defeats" the virus and you are no longer infectious.
This post was edited on 10/2/14 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:34 pm to JawjaTigah
What are you not persuaded by? There is no such thing as an asymptomatic chronic carrier of ebola in human populations. It is impossible, it does not exist. Locking someone with ebola away for months or years at a time would be entirely pointless.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:39 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:OK, forgive me for using a descriptive that doesn't fit the profile. Let's say mildly to moderately symptomatic but not overcome by the virus; functional enough to go to work, travel by bus or subway, come in contact with lots of people for a longer time than perhaps a medical textbook would predict. Die later than would be expected. Maybe the virus mutates. Would you then see the parallel?
There is no such thing as an asymptomatic chronic carrier of ebola in human populations.
This post was edited on 10/2/14 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:44 pm to JawjaTigah
quote:
For instance, what is to say someone's particular metabolism is able to stretch out the full-blown infectious stage to a point where they are mostly functional and moving around among a wide variety of people - like at a school or a mall or a hospital. Sneezing, coughing, sweating, vomiting in the streets... but not rapidly dying.
First of all, such a person would not be asymptomatic. Second, ebola is a very fragile virus incapable of surviving in a human host unless it is carrying out it's mechanism of endothelial infection...in which case the person will develop very serious and life threatening symptoms which either kill them or are overcome and the body kills off the virus.
Ebola, by it's very nature, is incapable of existing in a chronic carrier state in human beings.
quote:
What do we really know for certain about this disease?
A lot more than you do, apparently.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:46 pm to JawjaTigah
quote:
Let's say mildly to moderately symptomatic but not overcome by the virus; functional enough to go to work, travel by bus or subway, come in contact with lots of people for a longer time than perhaps a medical textbook would predict. Die later than would be expected. Maybe the virus mutates. Would you then see the parallel?
No, because such a person would either die or get better in a matter of weeks. Typhoid Mary was a LIFETIME carrier of salmonella typhi. Your entire thread hinges on what we would do if someone had to be "imprisoned" against their will for long periods of time.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:47 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:Ok I'm stupid. I suppose the folks in Dallas at Presbyterian Health Center are feeling pretty smart at the moment?
quote:
What do we really know for certain about this disease?
A lot more than you do, apparently.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:48 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Roger Klarvin
Well, what if a SPACE ALIEN from the planet Ebolian 7 were to come to earth, take human form, and walk around with ebola? He, being from aother galaxy is IMMUNE.
What THEN, smarty pants?
This post was edited on 10/2/14 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:49 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
Then we're fricked, but moreso due to the fact that any species capable of getting here from across the universe would have figured out how to do things that we currently consider physical impossibilities.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:53 pm to JawjaTigah
quote:
I suppose the folks in Dallas at Presbyterian Health Center are feeling pretty smart at the moment?
As someone who has worked at Presby before I can assure you that very little one could describe as "smart" goes on there.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:53 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:In a textbook scenario. Sometimes as Jeff Goldblum's character in Jurassic Park said, "Life will find a way." I assume that applies to viruses as well as dinosaurs.And also people who are on some level infected (but not yet overcome) by ebola. In real life, there are variables and unforeseen consequences that the textbooks don't take into consideration when giving out the certainties.
No, because such a person would either die or get better in a matter of weeks.
I am not in a box about Typhoid Mary, nor did I put this up to suggest the people around the Liberian guy in Dallas be put in bondage or anything such as you seem to be wanting me to have said (I didn't).
Like it or not, agree or not, I used her name in the way of a metaphor, to suggest that we really don't know how far a person symptomatic or only mildly/moderately so can go, in the midst of others - to infect, spread, or in some other way bring that virus around.
And thus I am not persuaded or soothed by the "certainties" that political operatives and medical staff members from Presby Health Center offer us. Plus, I am a Presbyterian.
This post was edited on 10/2/14 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 10/2/14 at 7:58 pm to JawjaTigah
quote:
I assume that applies to viruses as well as dinosaurs
Given that viruses are not life, I can stop you right there
quote:
Like it or not, agree or not, I used her name in the way of a metaphor, to suggest that we really don't know how far a person symptomatic or only mildly/moderately so can go, in the midst of others - to infect, spread, or in some other way bring that virus around.
But in the end, the person is not going to be walking around spreading the virus for months or years.
This post was edited on 10/2/14 at 8:00 pm
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:00 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:I knew you were going to say that. You can't pick up on metaphors or similies very easily, can you. I had you pegged as a science guy from the very first post. Lol.
Given that viruses are not life, I can stop you right there
quote:Would you kindly let go of the fundamentalist interpretation of how Typhoid Mary did what she did and accept that however similar or different, she did what she did? Be that for weeks, months, years. Obviously in West Africa, something is spreading the virus. Obviously not all of our hospitals, clinics, health care workers are alert enough to connect dots - maybe in part because they are so well-assured that it can't happen here (see Dallas). Obviously our ports of entry or borders are not screening entrants for such things as "were you recently in West Africa" or noticing stamps on passports because we're not really thinking this stuff can just walk, fly into our midst. Typhoid Marys can fly in from Liberia, visit relatives in Dallas or your own particular home town, and then become debilitated by their disease after being symptomatic for some period of time and being among other human beings. Right?
But in the end, the person is not going to be walking around spreading the virus for months or years.
Viruses can find a way. Like as life.
This post was edited on 10/2/14 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:06 pm to JawjaTigah
quote:
I knew you were going to say that. You can't pick up on metaphors or similies very easily, can you. I had you pegged as a science guy from the very first post. Lol.
JEEBUS!!
You asked a question (nothing wrong with that)
Someone with a real understanding of the subject explains why it is not realistic.
You can:
1) Choose to become more informed and appreciate the efforts of said poster, rest more easily
or
2) do you
Seriously...sometimes it is good to let go of a position and learn from others.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:10 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:Do you realize that a few months ago, people with real understanding of this disease (not all of them) were assuring us that it would hardly be possible for ebola to cross over from West Africa into the United States?
Someone with a real understanding of the subject explains why it is not realistic.
I'm glad you're willing to be assured.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:15 pm to JawjaTigah
quote:
o you realize that a few months ago, people with real understanding of this disease (not all of them) were assuring us that it would hardly be possible for ebola to cross over from West Africa into the United States?
Not a single person with a real understanding EVER said an infected person getting on a plane and landing here was "hardly possible". Not one. You made that up.
What has consistently been said is that there is no way that we would see outbreaks like over there.
More people will die of FOOD POISONING in the U.S. this month than will die of ebola this decade.
More people will die in car crashes in the U.S. TODAY than will die from ebola this year.
More people will die from falling off of ladders i the U.S. this year than will die from ebola this decade
But, you go ahead and wring your hands over this "scourge"
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:24 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
Not a single person with a real understanding EVER said an infected person getting on a plane and landing here was "hardly possible". Not one. You made that up.
What has consistently been said is that there is no way that we would see outbreaks like over there.
More people will die of FOOD POISONING in the U.S. this month than will die of ebola this decade.
More people will die in car crashes in the U.S. TODAY than will die from ebola this year.
More people will die from falling off of ladders i the U.S. this year than will die from ebola this decade
You are all wrong. I have it on good authority from my FB cousin that allowing ebola in is a giant ruse to fool people into taking an ebola vaccine that doesn't work but will in fact, sicken people and contribute to population control while making vaccine companies tons of money.
That sounds far more plausible than any of the bull shite in this thread.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:39 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:No actually there were people purportedly from the CDC as well as other reputable groups who were trotted out before the news media with exactly the kinds of assurances I described. Maybe these were really political operatives doing the talking points thing - I really don't know. But I do know there have been more and more voices out there talking about it from every side of the fence. The Dallas thing doesn't do much to help the public gain much confidence in either the healthcare industry's ability to meet the challenge of ebola, or its credibility in giving us assurances.
Not a single person with a real understanding EVER said an infected person getting on a plane and landing here was "hardly possible". Not one. You made that up.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 8:45 pm to JawjaTigah
What happens when aliens come and replace our bodily fluids with mind control kiquid?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News