Started By
Message
locked post

Is the War on Terror the perfect vehicle to keep the military going full steam?

Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:19 pm
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:19 pm
Now and into the future?

It appears to be a completely open ended conflict with no shortage of boogeymen.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:22 pm to
Absolutely. See my response to inthemorning.
It's all part of the plot to get us.
Posted by WhoDatGreenBeret
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2013
546 posts
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Absolutely. See my response to inthemorning.
It's all part of the plot to get us.


I promise you I will not "get" you.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:44 pm to
Yes
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8008 posts
Posted on 9/23/14 at 5:46 pm to
No

The military would rather conduct 1990's-style peacekeeping operations and a hundred joint training exercises per year and and would also rather divert resources going to destroy these idiots to future weapons programs.
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
32891 posts
Posted on 9/23/14 at 7:52 pm to
Thank god people like you arent in charge of such heady decisions wrt the military. Oh wait....
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
47135 posts
Posted on 9/23/14 at 7:53 pm to
Better than continuing the war on drugs.

Drugs don't plot to blow up people for not being one of them.
Posted by Plan 9
Earth
Member since Oct 2003
3572 posts
Posted on 9/23/14 at 7:54 pm to
I thought the Usurper in Chief was sending them to fight Ebola and John F'n Kerry wants them to fight globull warming? You know, exactly what they are trained to do.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35639 posts
Posted on 9/23/14 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

Is the War on Terror the perfect vehicle to keep the military going full steam?

Now and into the future?

It appears to be a completely open ended conflict with no shortage of boogeymen.
Don't be silly, government would never lie, cheat, steal, or do anything that wasn't in your best interest.
Posted by tiderider
Member since Nov 2012
7703 posts
Posted on 9/23/14 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

No

The military would rather conduct 1990's-style peacekeeping operations and a hundred joint training exercises per year and and would also rather divert resources going to destroy these idiots to future weapons programs.


the "Military" and the "businesses who run the military" are not one and the same ... one of them, along with the dems wall st cronies, runs the country ... the other one is made largely of people just trying to be patriotic ...
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
25207 posts
Posted on 9/23/14 at 8:07 pm to
Ah... the heady smell of conspiracy buffs in the air. Please tell me someone will accuse the secret Reptillian Overlords of masterminding this whole thing.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35639 posts
Posted on 9/23/14 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Ah... the heady smell of conspiracy buffs in the air. Please tell me someone will accuse the secret Reptillian Overlords of masterminding this whole thing.
Nothing anywhere near that needed. The sheople will fall for damn near anything. 19 Muslims with boxcutters, for example.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48421 posts
Posted on 9/24/14 at 12:00 am to
quote:

Nothing anywhere near that needed. The sheople will fall for damn near anything. 19 Muslims with boxcutters, for example.



I see that you never give it a rest, do you, buddy?
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17260 posts
Posted on 9/24/14 at 12:13 am to
quote:

Now and into the future?


Well, at least until the Chinese military is built up enough to be truly belligerent.

But, in seriousness, I do not predict any major military budget cuts in our future.

Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 9/24/14 at 1:37 am to
They make up whatever.

False flag videos - youtube...see it's all nonsense.

Keep the machine rolling.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58055 posts
Posted on 9/24/14 at 5:06 am to
quote:

Now and into the future? It appears to be a completely open ended conflict with no shortage of boogeymen.



Will never end but continue to escalate, yes.
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 9/24/14 at 5:23 am to
quote:

the "Military" and the "businesses who run the military" are not one and the same ... one of them, along with the dems wall st cronies, runs the country ... the other one is made
quote:

largely of people just trying to be patriotic ...





This is true of the rank and file military....but when you get to about the rank of Lt Colonel and they start thinking about civillian DoD jobs or federal contracts this mindset changes in direct proportion as they gain rank. By the time a soldier has a star on his chest he is about as corrupt, in general, as any politician in Washington....
Posted by WhoDatGreenBeret
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2013
546 posts
Posted on 9/24/14 at 5:41 am to
quote:

This is true of the rank and file military....but when you get to about the rank of Lt Colonel and they start thinking about civillian DoD jobs or federal contracts this mindset changes in direct proportion as they gain rank. By the time a soldier has a star on his chest he is about as corrupt, in general, as any politician in Washington....


There is largely a lot of truth in this; but even with politicians in D.C. there are exceptions. In the DOD there are even more exceptions when it comes to generals and corruption if you ask me. To stick around that long and play the game of "making rank" definitely changes you a bit. I think a lot of these guys are just interested in serving the people of this great country, but there are some who are interested in serving themselves and their interests.
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 9/24/14 at 5:48 am to
quote:

There is largely a lot of truth in this; but even with politicians in D.C. there are exceptions. In the DOD there are even more exceptions when it comes to generals and corruption if you ask me. To stick around that long and play the game of "making rank" definitely changes you a bit. I think a lot of these guys are just interested in serving the people of this great country, but there are some who are interested in serving themselves and their interests.


I doubt if many go into the military with pocket lining at the forefront....but after years and years of seeing others do it along with the natural cynicism that comes with age many do eventually get to the point where their own interests are more important than that of the nation....and not all of them, but a bunch of 'em....
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67991 posts
Posted on 9/24/14 at 5:52 am to
Meh.

If it weren't mohammedan marauders, it would be some other group.

The history of people has been that there is always some organized bunch out there willing to plunder another.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram