Started By
Message

SI.com piece on why the Saints are Super Bowl contenders.

Posted on 8/27/14 at 9:44 am
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 9:44 am


quote:

The word “blueprint” is grossly overused in pro football these days. But if ever it were apt, it’s in the case of what the Seahawks defense did to the Saints offense last year. On Monday night in Week 13, with deafening noise cascading down at CenturyLink Field, the Seahawks held the Saints to 188 yards, blowing them out 34-7. Six weeks later in the divisional round, in front of an even louder CenturyLink crowd and under angry rain clouds, it happened again, as Drew Brees had just 34 yards passing in the first half.

So what “blueprint” did Seattle draft? For one, the home-field advantage helped. As Brees has pointedly told the media, contrary to popular belief, the Saints offense is almost as prolific outdoors as it is in in the Superdome. But the offense, thanks to myriad personnel packages, is very dependent on communication. Bad weather and an uncommonly raucous crowd hinder that.

More than that, though, much of Sean Payton’s play designs attack the middle of the field, which is exactly where Seattle’s defense is designed to swarm. With dominant one-on-one outside corners compressing everything, the Seahawks have extra bodies to use in a smaller area of space. As the Saints found out, that can be overwhelming.

Not every defense has the personnel to play this way, but the Saints also don’t have the dynamic outside receiving weapons to discourage defenses from at least attempting it. Another element of the blueprint: no blitzing. Brees is way too fast at processing information, and Payton is way too committed to giving his so-so offensive tackles chip-block help, creating seven-man protections early in the down (i.e. when most blitzes are built to work).

Defenses can still get pressure on Brees with a four-man rush. It’s often nullified by the 35-year-old’s unbelievable ability to move in the pocket, reset and throw. But if Brees is unable to reset, his arm strength plummets – something we saw more than usual last season. With Brees being too quick of a progression reader, the key becomes eliminating his reads. If you can compress the outsides then a basic coverage scheme—either man or zone, whatever the defense is most comfortable—does the trick, just as long as it’s well-executed.


quote:

There is no blueprint for facing the Saints defense. Rob Ryan isn’t married to any core scheme; he’s an extremely opponent-specific game-planner. That’s why you’ll see the Saints take an almost pure coverage-based approach one week (something they’ve done a lot more often than people realize) and come out the next week with a barrage of different slot and safety blitz designs.






LINK
Posted by ATLienTiger
NOLA
Member since Oct 2006
26858 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 9:50 am to
Moreso the blueprint was our over reliance on Graham and Sproles in the passing game, and Paytons lack of commitment to the running game. When those 2 couldn't get open we had no idea what to do next.
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 9:53 am to
We really COULDN'T run for most of the year. Brown was never a consistent run blocker. Neither was dlp. Evans was hurt for the first part of the year, and Grubbs was sandwiched between dlp and Brown.
Posted by bountyhunter
North of Houston a bit
Member since Mar 2012
6326 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Paytons lack of commitment to the running game

He was committed, but it would be foolish to continue to do something in a game that doesn't work. Oline play was atrocious until Brown was yanked out of the starting lineup.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64208 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 9:57 am to
A well written article.

How nice.

Posted by ATLienTiger
NOLA
Member since Oct 2006
26858 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 9:58 am to
I was just pointing out Drews favoritism and Paytons predictable play calls/personnel packages. Much of which played a large part in why the offense sputtered, along with their great defense of course.
Posted by GMoney2600
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
14090 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 9:59 am to
Guy knows what he's talking about...except for calling our o-tackles so-so. If he was including Brown instead of Armtstead, then I would agree.
Posted by mark65mc
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
11278 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 10:07 am to
I think the way to beat the Seahawks blueprint is by having receivers like Stills and Cooks to go along with Colston and Graham and continuing to focus on running the football. Ingram cannot fumble though. I don't think Sherman can stay with Cooks, so we need to find ways to get him a clean release from the line and a little bit of space.
Once that happens, the middle opens up and gives Graham a bit more room to operate.

I also think that we have to have home field if we want to beat Seattle. In our house with no noise and perfect weather, we will smoke them.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70891 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 10:09 am to
quote:

We really COULDN'T run for most of the year.


Exactly. My dad bitched and moaned about how we never "committed" to the run game, and I tried to tell inconsistency and injuries were the reason.

Posted by mm2316
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Member since Aug 2010
6942 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 10:15 am to
Good article, but the Khiry Robinson/Curits Martin comparison is definitely the new "Did you know Jimmy Graham played basketball in college."
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 10:19 am
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 10:16 am to
Yeah.

He hasn't had the best blocking in the preseason, but I've also seen a bit of him trying to force things recently.
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
24495 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 10:18 am to
could be a reflection off of his facemask, but #60 looks like he is REALLY into what Brees is saying
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115495 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 10:19 am to
I knew going into the Seattle game that the amount of personnel packages we were running in and out of games wouldn't work. We needed to simplify, have a few basic packages, and keep mostly the same personnel on the field for a drive. Go hurry up or no huddle and silent count. We didn't do that and got crushed.

All last year I felt our pace was off. Way to many predictable personnel groupings running in and out. We were constantly in the huddle late, and constantly barely getting the play off, if at all, even at home.

We've got to tone it down this year and get in and out of huddles faster. Pace pace pace.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33706 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Regarding the rest of the Saints pass rush, many believe it to be ferocious because of this defense’s swarming nature and Cameron Jordan’s breakout 12.5-sack season. But several of Jordan’s sacks were coverage sacks, and it was regularly apparent that the front seven doesn’t have enough speed outside of Junior Galette to consistently generate its own pressure.


huh. I know on several of those, Jordan just whipped his man off the ball. But whatever.

quote:

Behind this group are inside linebackers Curtis Lofton and David Hawthorne, two fast, attack-minded players who have erupted in Ryan’s scheme.


sounds like we have a believer for our buddy Hawthorne.

quote:

More than that, though, much of Sean Payton’s play designs attack the middle of the field, which is exactly where Seattle’s defense is designed to swarm. With dominant one-on-one outside corners compressing everything, the Seahawks have extra bodies to use in a smaller area of space. As the Saints found out, that can be overwhelming.


couldn't you say just about the same thing for most offenses though that face the Seahawks? They get a lot of pressure from their front four and can drop their athletic LB's underneath to crowd things over the middle.

that could complicate things for any offense even if they used more of a vertical passing game.





Posted by The Hurricane
Gulf of Mexico
Member since Aug 2011
7945 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 12:17 pm to
I only see one gunslinger.



Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 12:19 pm to
Brees v Ryan
Lol
Posted by 4thandinches
River Ridge
Member since Apr 2012
2395 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Brees v Ryan
Lol


No contest
Posted by Alatgr
Mobeezy, Alabizzle
Member since Sep 2005
17660 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

With dominant one-on-one outside corners holding on every play the Seahawks have extra bodies to use in a smaller area of space.


FIFH

Yes, I'm still mad.
Posted by mark65mc
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
11278 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 12:33 pm to
I guess we are going to lose the last preseason game now. Thanks SI Cover Jinx.
Posted by WeBleedCrimson
Member since Mar 2008
21708 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 12:34 pm to
Matt Ryan? Gunslinger? Lol
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram