Matt Forte or Eddie Lacy?

why wouldnt you pick Forte

Well 4th pick is convinced Arian is going to have a monster year so he is taking him.

I also just have a feeling Lacy will have a monster year.

Don't worry. You are in a good spot there. Can't go wrong with either, but I'd go Forte

I am still so torn.

quote:

---

I expect Lacey's YPC to increase as well as his receptions. I can see him leading the league in TD's as I think the Packers are going to go off this year. Lacy does have some injury concerns from college and the concussion on the cheap shot last year. People are also scared he may pull Trent Richardson, but he has much beter vision than Trent and GB's o-line is legit

---

I watched every one of his games last year...all of this is true. To add, lacy breaks tackles and has excellent vision and despite his size has pretty good burst through the line...when Rodgers and lacy were in together, lacy was unstoppable. With two backup bums and injuries, lacy still beasted. If they're inside the 5, lacy is getting the ball...with Rodgers back, they'll be inside the 5

also, lacy was targeted for more receptions when Rodgers was in...he'll check it down and lacy will catch it.

If people watched lacy last year, they should know he's in for a big year.

I don't feel like I am,

like I said this dude got a bad hand last year and still was a monster

GB wanted RB by committee
no Rodgers - stacked boxes and playing from behind
early season concussion
late season ankle (not very serious one)
a HC who kind of sucks at situational playcalling (throw throw throw)

all that, and he still just crushed it...you could see a shift in McCarthy's playcalling as he kept performing well.

this year, Rodgers is back (no stacked boxes, playing with leads), lacy has more experience, more offseason work, is the undisputed bell cow, what's not to like?

is forte not a risk. he has an injury history, and the bears have a history of throwing on the goalline. Also, the bears have a porous defense. Look at how teams ran the ball on them. Yeah, trestman offense is really impressive, but it's possible the bears are going to be throwing a lot

I'd rather have the guy who gets more carries than more receptions...I'm a Tulane guy and I wouldn't take forte until Peterson, McCoy, lacy, and Charles are off the board

we're talking about the difference between the 4th best RB and the 5th...is it that crazy?

You can't even, well I've seen it time and time again to my detriment and benefit

It's better without mike tice, but they spell him on the goaline and they throw on the goaline

We're talking about 2 really good players here

No injury history? Look at how awesome his 2012 season was with Michael bush vulturing the limited goaline opportunities and forte nursing an ankle sprain

Mccoy, Forte, and JC will all be catching screens in the red zone. If Indy was smart, they would use TR that way like Bama did.

I would go Mccoy 1, JC 2, but Forte is not a bad choice at 3, IMO.