- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How does an anarchist state defend itself from foreign invasion?
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:07 pm
A questioned I have pondered in the early stages of thinking about different political philosophies on a deeper level.
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:09 pm to weagle99
Private paramilitary groups to meet demand of people seeking to defend property and the lives of friends and family.
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:10 pm to weagle99
With bitcoins mother fricker
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:11 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Have an upvote.
Also, it's hard to invade any anarchist state because no one has built any roads.
Also, it's hard to invade any anarchist state because no one has built any roads.
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:13 pm to weagle99
quote:
A questioned I have pondered in the early stages of thinking about different political philosophies on a deeper level.
I don't know, but Afghanistan seems to do it pretty well.
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:14 pm to LordoftheManor
quote:
Private paramilitary groups to meet demand
I'm not sure I believe these would exist, at least ones worth a shite, with just a few years of general peace
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:16 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
I don't know, but Afghanistan seems to do it pretty well.
With a massive, almost unmatched (anywhere else in the world) terrain advantage. It is equaled in only a few other places.
Probably not the best example.
ETA: Such an arrangement is virtually impossible in a nuclear world, anyway.
This post was edited on 7/21/14 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:18 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
Afghanistan isn't the type of anarchist state some on this board envision. Although that's what it would it would turn into.
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:28 pm to weagle99
Body odor from anarchist crust punks.
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:31 pm to weagle99
Good question. Here's another: how does an anarchist state defend property rights?
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:31 pm to 90proofprofessional
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/31/19 at 6:36 pm
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:38 pm to LordoftheManor
quote:
There already are illegal paramilitary groups all over the world that are quite good at what they do. Now imagine them being funded by people defending their children, to say nothing of investment by trade partners all over the world with a vested interest in a free market.
Not really. They would all - to the very last man - be crushed in a day if a serious player had the will to do it. Israel could wipe Hezb'allah or Hamas off the map with the press of a button if they so wished. Iran could take wipe out ISIS in a few days if it really came to it. On and on.
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:40 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
A questioned I have pondered in the early stages of thinking about different political philosophies on a deeper level.
Why dont you ask Afghanistan or Vietnam?
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:42 pm to LordoftheManor
quote:
There already are illegal paramilitary groups all over the world that are quite good at what they do.
They take on any state armies lately?
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:42 pm to ninthward
quote:
Why dont you ask Afghanistan or Vietnam?
You mean two forces funded, equipped, and (in some cases) even manned by powerful and heavily-armed state allies?
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:48 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:So they were united by foreign states? or aided? big difference.
You mean two forces funded, equipped, and (in some cases) even manned by powerful and heavily-armed state allies?
What paramilitary group just took on a national force? ISIS
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:49 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:
They take on any state armies lately?
There's a good chance they'd be fighting alongside state armies that would have their best interest in defending them.
I'm not considering Afghanistan, but instead thinking of an anarcho-capitalist state that promotes freedom and peace.
This post was edited on 7/21/14 at 10:50 pm
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:53 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
I don't know, but Afghanistan seems to do it pretty well.
If letting a foreign power roll through your country and destroy everything counts, then I suppose they do. If they had any natural resource worth taking, and we had the desire to take it, we would have no difficulty.
Posted on 7/21/14 at 10:55 pm to LordoftheManor
quote:
anarcho-capitalist state that promotes freedom and peace.
Like communism, it looks great on paper, but a terrible idea in reality.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News