- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
FBI Entrapment
Posted on 6/16/14 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 6/16/14 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 6/16/14 at 7:14 pm to Iowa Golfer
Why would the FBI target Joe Montana???
Posted on 6/16/14 at 7:56 pm to Iowa Golfer
quote:
Montana was never asked to do anything illegal...
Not entrapment. And if you think the FBI wasn't more onerous under Hoover, you might just be a jarhead.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 8:23 pm to Navytiger74
frick the FBI and 18USC1001, et. seq.
Motherfrickers don't even have to produce a transcript or anything tangible. They can just say you "lied".
Motherfrickers don't even have to produce a transcript or anything tangible. They can just say you "lied".
Posted on 6/16/14 at 8:27 pm to Iowa Golfer
quote:
After discovering California state Sen. Leland Yee was involved in campaign corruption and gun trafficking, the FBI decided to cast a wide net to all sorts of California investments to see if anyone else was involved in financial illegalities.
That's fricked up
Posted on 6/16/14 at 8:29 pm to Strannix
quote:
Why would the FBI target Joe Montana???
Sketchers
Posted on 6/16/14 at 8:30 pm to VOR
quote:
FBI Entrapment frick the FBI and 18USC1001, et. seq. Motherfrickers don't even have to produce a transcript or anything tangible. They can just say you "lied".
Jim brown and I agree.. He may or may not have been into illegal shite but boy did he get fricked IMO.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 8:32 pm to Strannix
quote:
Why would the FBI target Joe Montana???
They were actually targeting Barry Manilow. Mistaken identity.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 8:35 pm to TROLA
Not entrapment. But over reaching. And screw the federal code where you are guilty, until you plead guilty, because if you fight, and get found guilty, you'd better hang on.
So if you take the stand, and are later found guilty, they charge and convict after the fact perjury.
The federal government employee is a special kind of person, to be loathed by those of us who actually did build something.
So if you take the stand, and are later found guilty, they charge and convict after the fact perjury.
The federal government employee is a special kind of person, to be loathed by those of us who actually did build something.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:00 pm to Iowa Golfer
But, but the FBI are just there to protect us good American citizens.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:21 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Not entrapment
quote:More relativism?
And if you think the FBI wasn't more onerous under Hoover
If you think Ted Bundy wasn't more onerous than Jeffery Dahmer . . . .
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:24 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Not entrapment
So they didn't lead along into anything illegal, but you think it was entrapment?
quote:
If you think Ted Bundy wasn't more onerous than Jeffery Dahmer . . .
I believe the post that earned my response read something along the lines of "one more sign 'murka is going down the tubes." It begs a comparison to the past, does it not?
I'll need a response soon. It's nearing bedtime.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:35 pm to Navytiger74
quote:What is it you think they were doing, Navy?
So they didn't lead along into anything illegal
quote:Relativism is what it is. He called the overreaching FBI actions "overreaching". It was. It was complete B.S.
It begs a comparison to the past, does it not?
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:40 pm to NC_Tigah
In criminal law, entrapment is a practice whereby a law enforcement agent induces a person to commit a criminal offense that the person would have otherwise been unlikely to commit.[1]
Since they didn't induce him into committing a criminal offense at all, I'd say that they are clear of entrapment.
That's fair. When, however, one references "where we're going or how far we've come" or anything of the sort, there is an inescapable allusion to and comparison with something past.
Since they didn't induce him into committing a criminal offense at all, I'd say that they are clear of entrapment.
quote:
He called the overreaching FBI actions "overreaching".
That's fair. When, however, one references "where we're going or how far we've come" or anything of the sort, there is an inescapable allusion to and comparison with something past.
This post was edited on 6/16/14 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:11 am to Iowa Golfer
Never invite the man into your life unless absolutely necessary.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News