- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Haha Steve Meyers lost...
Posted on 5/8/14 at 9:41 am
Posted on 5/8/14 at 9:41 am
the A hole that's been putting Section 8 housing signs up all over Southdowns lost. State Supreme Ct. ruled against him on the Zoning issue. 
ETA: Sorry can't find a better link.
LINK
ETA: Sorry can't find a better link.
LINK
This post was edited on 5/8/14 at 9:50 am
11
Posted on 5/8/14 at 9:41 am to Pennymoney
Well, someone's a bit of a poor sport.
Posted on 5/8/14 at 9:41 am to Pennymoney
Sorry can't find any fricks
Posted on 5/8/14 at 9:42 am to Pennymoney
quote:
State Supreme Ct.
is racist
Posted on 5/8/14 at 9:42 am to Pennymoney
God I love his lemons though
Posted on 5/8/14 at 9:48 am to Pennymoney
Posted on 5/8/14 at 9:49 am to spslayto
Posted on 5/8/14 at 9:50 am to Pennymoney
Sorry for trying to make money
Signed,
Steve Myers
Signed,
Steve Myers
Posted on 5/8/14 at 9:57 am to Pennymoney
So this means they reversed the decision that he can rent to non-married people (as in college roommates) right?
Which has nothing to do with Section 8.
Which has nothing to do with Section 8.
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:03 am to Pennymoney
So this means they reversed the decision that he can rent to multiple people that aren't related in A-1 zones right (aka non-single family)?
He is still going to have Section 8 welcome signs all over Southdowns.....
He is still going to have Section 8 welcome signs all over Southdowns.....
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:05 am to LSUBoo
quote:
So this means they reversed the decision that he can rent to non-married people (as in college roommates) right?
Yes
Which has nothing to do with Section 8.
It has everything to do with it. He's an A Hole of the 1st order.
He put those signs up to thumb his nose at the Southdowns community, and is so spiteful he's willing to drive his own property values down.
He's a Scumbag.
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:07 am to Pennymoney
quote:
He's a Scumbag.
The rich get richer....the mad get madder.
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:08 am to Pennymoney
quote:
It has everything to do with it. He's an A Hole of the 1st order.
He put those signs up to thumb his nose at the Southdowns community, and is so spiteful he's willing to drive his own property values down.
He's a Scumbag.
He's certainly a scumbag, but this is the opposite decision you should hope for if you don't want to deal with section 8.
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:10 am to Pennymoney
So this ruling is in regard to single-family housing? I was under the impression that this was the reason for the Section 8 signs. If they aren't going to let him rent the houses to unrelated occupants, he intends to rent to Section 8 tenants.
So how does this affect the Section 8 part?
So how does this affect the Section 8 part?
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:16 am to swampdawg
It doesn't. It will only increase the likely hood of him renting to section 8 because he will have a harder time renting to college kids.
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:16 am to LSUBoo
quote:
but this is the opposite decision you should hope for if you don't want to deal with section 8.
No. He was pushing Section 8 either way just to spite them. You don't think the signs would have gone down had he won do you?
But now he's been bitch slapped by the S. Ct. and the neighbors on his major issue they're going to be all over him on enforcement of all ordinances now.
Plus he paid Wade Shows close to 100k in atty fees and lost. ..
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:17 am to Pennymoney
quote:
No. He was pushing Section 8 either way just to spite them. You don't think the signs would have gone down had he won do you?
Yes, because he would rent to college kids. The Section 8 thing was a bluff, but now he might do it out of spite.
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:19 am to Pennymoney
quote:
You don't think the signs would have gone down had he won do you?
Who knows? Me....I'd rather rent for $1800/mth to 3 college students rather than renting to a family for $800/mth whose father is an ex-con and very well may blow up 2 blocks in Southdowns with his meth lab......I'm just saying.
This post was edited on 5/8/14 at 10:20 am
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:19 am to Pennymoney
I'd assume this would garner more of a "salt the earth" response from him. He's probably madder now. Who knows what he might do?
Posted on 5/8/14 at 10:20 am to LSUBoo
quote:
Yes, because he would rent to college kids. The Section 8 thing was a bluff, but now he might do it out of spite.
I kinda hope he does for the sake of jimmy rustling.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News