- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Anyone have any idea how serious this is(points deductions)
Posted on 5/3/14 at 9:47 pm
Posted on 5/3/14 at 9:47 pm
Fulham, Cardiff, Norwich going the bitch route it seems.
guess we just need to win out to shut them up
guess we just need to win out to shut them up
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:27 pm to St Augustine
Hopefully very serious and sunderland go down
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:45 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Well that would give you chance at a few more wins. But that's just silly. Why would you want an enjoyable rivalry to be put in hold, fake hatred? Seems like if we keep the 3 pt lead it wouldn't even matter. I get Norwich maybe saying something but Fulham and Cardiff just seem pathetic in this.
This post was edited on 5/3/14 at 10:46 pm
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:54 pm to St Augustine
Generally pretty serious.
It happened to QPR a few years back when they ran right through the nPower Championship League.
Their point deduction would have put them in 6th and still in the playoffs, but ultimately the league overturned it. The FA is pretty quick about these things though. They usually get right down to it.
It happened to QPR a few years back when they ran right through the nPower Championship League.
Their point deduction would have put them in 6th and still in the playoffs, but ultimately the league overturned it. The FA is pretty quick about these things though. They usually get right down to it.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 11:11 pm to St Augustine
Why was the player ineligible in the first place?
Norwich must be promising huge kick-backs to Cardiff and Fulham.
Norwich must be promising huge kick-backs to Cardiff and Fulham.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 11:16 pm to St Augustine
quote:
Why would you want an enjoyable rivalry to be put in hold
To see sunderland fans suffer
quote:
fake hatred?
nothing fake about it
Posted on 5/3/14 at 11:20 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:
Ji played in three other league fixtures – against Fulham, Crystal Palace and Manchester United. Sunderland lost all of them, which was one of the factors in the league's decision-making, along with the fact that the club had reported their own mistake at the first opportunity. Ji needed international clearance because he had been on loan at Augsburg. Liz Coley, Sunderland's secretary, left her position shortly after the error came to light.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 11:45 pm to St Augustine
Yeah I read the article too, but it doesn't say what he did to be ineligible. Was it having a pre contract with Dortmund? Looks like he was on Sunderland since 2011.
Eta: the loan part is strange. The guy has been licensed by the league for 3 years prior.
Eta: the loan part is strange. The guy has been licensed by the league for 3 years prior.
This post was edited on 5/3/14 at 11:46 pm
Posted on 5/3/14 at 11:49 pm to St Augustine
quote:
Why would you want an enjoyable rivalry to be put in hold
Yeah, uh, English football fans do not care if annual rivalry matches aren't played due to the opposition getting relegated.
Posted on 5/4/14 at 12:05 am to AirRaidTT
Good to know.
I wouldn't care if DS was relegated to the SEC rant if we're being completely forthright.
I wouldn't care if DS was relegated to the SEC rant if we're being completely forthright.
Posted on 5/4/14 at 12:08 am to Keys Open Doors
quote:
Yeah I read the article too, but it doesn't say what he did to be ineligible. Was it having a pre contract with Dortmund? Looks like he was on Sunderland since 2011.
Eta: the loan part is strange. The guy has been licensed by the league for 3 years prior.
Yeah I couldn't find any other articles further clarifying it. I was almost wondering if this journalist was trying to manufacture some drama here.
Posted on 5/4/14 at 5:14 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
To see sunderland fans suffer
how many sunderland fans do you come across in Austin?
Posted on 5/4/14 at 7:13 am to St Augustine
As the board's resident expert on points deductions and relegation...i predict nothing comes of this.
Just a hail mary from the clubs going down.
Just a hail mary from the clubs going down.
Posted on 5/4/14 at 9:13 am to Alabama Slim
quote:
how many sunderland fans do you come across in Austin?
Too many
Posted on 5/4/14 at 9:18 am to Draconian Sanctions
Your just mad they blackcats been owning dat arse of late.
Posted on 5/4/14 at 9:33 am to StraightCashHomey21
I almost posted that
Posted on 5/4/14 at 9:37 am to St Augustine
Nothing will come of it, the FA are happy to deduct lower league teams points with this issue but they wont have the bottle to potentially relegate a team with one.
Having said that, they should, he was ineligible and a precedent has been set of points deductions for it.
Having said that, they should, he was ineligible and a precedent has been set of points deductions for it.
Posted on 5/4/14 at 9:59 am to engvol
Seems like poyet even thought southhampton Should've gotten the win. They just said on Nbc that it was essentially a self reported clerical error which is likely why the league didn't punish it further. I'd like to get another win and Create enough space that it really isn't an issue regardless.
Posted on 5/4/14 at 10:28 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Your just mad
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News