- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Shift in Tone After Feminists Learn Identity of News Outlet Interviewing Them
Posted on 4/4/14 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 4/4/14 at 12:13 pm
Video in Link
quote:
It looked like peaches and cream for the folks behind the camera interviewing those gathered at the National Young Feminist Leadership Conference in Washington, D..C. late last month.
The reporter with the microphone asked attendees what feminism meant to them and what it could mean to others, and it was all smiles and positivity and declarations that feminism was “for everyone” and “more inclusive.”
That is until they learned the reporter was from Campus Reform, a conservative news outlet that focuses on college students.
One guy kind of said it all as he reacted with quite the non-subtle, “Oh…ohhhhh…”
3
Posted on 4/4/14 at 12:30 pm to wickowick
So tolerant Posted on 4/4/14 at 12:59 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
I hate fragmented pieces like that, cutting in and out of events.
Not sayings its made up, but it is easier to twist words.
For instance, when she asked a question and then suddenly cut away when the person responded.
But they didn't cut away later in the video with a different person.
What, was the first response not inflammatory enough to warrant inclusion? So basically the reporter is admitting you are cherry picking events to suit a narrative.
So for all we know, 90% of people actually responded (even after being "warned") and they edited them out.
Not saying that's what happened.
I don't know.
And that's the point.
That's the consequence of drive by editing.
Not sayings its made up, but it is easier to twist words.
For instance, when she asked a question and then suddenly cut away when the person responded.
But they didn't cut away later in the video with a different person.
What, was the first response not inflammatory enough to warrant inclusion? So basically the reporter is admitting you are cherry picking events to suit a narrative.
So for all we know, 90% of people actually responded (even after being "warned") and they edited them out.
Not saying that's what happened.
I don't know.
And that's the point.
That's the consequence of drive by editing.
This post was edited on 4/4/14 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 4/4/14 at 9:12 pm to Volvagia
quote:
What, was the first response not inflammatory enough to warrant inclusion? So basically the reporter is admitting you are cherry picking events to suit a narrative.
So for all we know, 90% of people actually responded (even after being "warned") and they edited them out.
Welcome to the MSM.
Posted on 4/5/14 at 12:14 am to wickowick
I love the tit cam
IWHI btw.
IWHI btw.
Posted on 4/5/14 at 1:06 am to wickowick
Video evidence that many self-proclaimed feminists are total sell outs.
Democrats first, feminists second.
Democrats first, feminists second.
This post was edited on 4/5/14 at 1:07 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News