- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Rise of Egotarian Cuisine
Posted on 3/26/14 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 3/26/14 at 1:59 pm
quote:
Something has gone wrong in our restaurant kitchens lately. Suddenly, a new breed of chefs seem to have decided that they should be cooking not for your pleasure but for their own. In this competitive, male-dominated school of cooking, the dishes that customers are served may be highly inventive and intelligent, but as Alan Richman notes, too often they are more self-indulgent than inspired. The result? Restaurants where the only person who needs to be pleased is never you, just the chef.
LINK
Posted on 3/26/14 at 2:13 pm to Stadium Rat
This is certainly no new phenomenon, though it may be more common.
ETA: GQ, shouldn't have read.
ETA: GQ, shouldn't have read.
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 3/26/14 at 3:49 pm to Stadium Rat
Captivating non-story there GQ. The amount of restaurants that adhere to the author's theory are most likely a very minuscule amount of the total number of restaurants in the country. And even if a chef does approach his menu in this way, there's a clear ability of the consumer to choose to not patronize that business .. hence if it's a failure of approach the market will reflect that.
Posted on 3/26/14 at 3:59 pm to Stadium Rat
Places that refuse to accommodate the customer are rare and are generally upscale places with a sophisticated menu and a serious chef. I can't say I hate them for that either. If you're too picky to eat the meal the way it was intended, go to one of the other 90-something percent of restaurants that will happily leave out whatever you wish.
I'm learning to come to terms with people's pickiness, but there's a limit to it. It's one thing to not want a dollop of sour cream on your enchilada at a normal restaurant; it's something entirely different to patronize one of these special case restaurants with a chef-created menu and want a dish cooked without an integral ingredient (excluding allergies).
I'm learning to come to terms with people's pickiness, but there's a limit to it. It's one thing to not want a dollop of sour cream on your enchilada at a normal restaurant; it's something entirely different to patronize one of these special case restaurants with a chef-created menu and want a dish cooked without an integral ingredient (excluding allergies).
Posted on 3/26/14 at 4:09 pm to Stadium Rat
Terrible article
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 3/26/14 at 4:12 pm to Stadium Rat
Picky eating is my #1 pet peeve.
Posted on 3/26/14 at 4:15 pm to Rohan2Reed
quote:
Captivating non-story there GQ. The amount of restaurants that adhere to the author's theory are most likely a very minuscule amount of the total number of restaurants in the country. And even if a chef does approach his menu in this way, there's a clear ability of the consumer to choose to not patronize that business .. hence if it's a failure of approach the market will reflect that.
The article essentially strikes me a "egotarian" self-indulgence masquerading as a critique of "egotarian" self-indulgence. The whole thing it's supposedly skewering is such a non-issue.
Posted on 3/26/14 at 5:45 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
The whole thing it's supposedly skewering is such a non-issue.
Like it's a widespread restaurant epidemic.
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 5:46 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News