Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

The Rise of Egotarian Cuisine

Posted on 3/26/14 at 1:59 pm
Posted by Stadium Rat
Metairie
Member since Jul 2004
9534 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 1:59 pm
quote:

Something has gone wrong in our restaurant kitchens lately. Suddenly, a new breed of chefs seem to have decided that they should be cooking not for your pleasure but for their own. In this competitive, male-dominated school of cooking, the dishes that customers are served may be highly inventive and intelligent, but as Alan Richman notes, too often they are more self-indulgent than inspired. The result? Restaurants where the only person who needs to be pleased is never you, just the chef.



LINK
Posted by Oenophile Brah
The Edge of Sanity
Member since Jan 2013
7540 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 2:13 pm to
This is certainly no new phenomenon, though it may be more common.

ETA: GQ, shouldn't have read.
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 2:14 pm
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 3:49 pm to
Captivating non-story there GQ. The amount of restaurants that adhere to the author's theory are most likely a very minuscule amount of the total number of restaurants in the country. And even if a chef does approach his menu in this way, there's a clear ability of the consumer to choose to not patronize that business .. hence if it's a failure of approach the market will reflect that.
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
81185 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 3:59 pm to
Places that refuse to accommodate the customer are rare and are generally upscale places with a sophisticated menu and a serious chef. I can't say I hate them for that either. If you're too picky to eat the meal the way it was intended, go to one of the other 90-something percent of restaurants that will happily leave out whatever you wish.

I'm learning to come to terms with people's pickiness, but there's a limit to it. It's one thing to not want a dollop of sour cream on your enchilada at a normal restaurant; it's something entirely different to patronize one of these special case restaurants with a chef-created menu and want a dish cooked without an integral ingredient (excluding allergies).
Posted by Caplewood
Atlanta
Member since Jun 2010
39156 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 4:09 pm to
Terrible article
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 4:10 pm
Posted by Bear Is Dead
Monroe
Member since Nov 2007
4696 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 4:12 pm to
Picky eating is my #1 pet peeve.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101293 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Captivating non-story there GQ. The amount of restaurants that adhere to the author's theory are most likely a very minuscule amount of the total number of restaurants in the country. And even if a chef does approach his menu in this way, there's a clear ability of the consumer to choose to not patronize that business .. hence if it's a failure of approach the market will reflect that.


The article essentially strikes me a "egotarian" self-indulgence masquerading as a critique of "egotarian" self-indulgence. The whole thing it's supposedly skewering is such a non-issue.
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
81185 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

The whole thing it's supposedly skewering is such a non-issue.


Like it's a widespread restaurant epidemic.
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 5:46 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram