Does everyone deserve equal rights?

quote:

---

Of course, just some are more equal than others...

---

More equal > equal

quote:

---

These rights are right to life, right to free practice of religion, right to private property (meaning government shouldn't step in a just steal property, it doesn't mean every person should have free property you still have to obtain it for yourself). A couple others I may be forgetting

---

But if our rights derive from nature instead of a creator, shouldn't our system be solely designed to function by survival of the fittest and let those who are weaker die off? Instead we enable the weak to prosper. ( Catholic, you know how I feel about this and I'm simply playing Devil's Advocate)

quote:

---

Rights do not exist in the objective sense, human society does tend to function better when certain rights are preserved.

---

Would one of those rights be the right to vote? And should a person who pays no income taxes be allowed to vote to raise such taxes on others?

quote:

---

Would one of those rights be the right to vote? And should a person who who pays no income taxes be allowed to vote to raise such taxes on others?

---

No, I do not think that voting is/should be a right.

Rev I'm going to respond to your point but I have to go for a-little while.

give me an hour or two and I'll give you my response.

If there is no creator then the answer is no. There is no foundation for the value of human life or rights if there is no God.

quote:

---

non believers would try and convince us that nature somehow bestows some special privilege to us that merits rights.

---

Or, as I have said, rights do not objectively exist (neither do morals), but civilization and human happiness tend to excel when certain 'rights' are thought to be innate.

Some of the things you listed are rights, while others are not. The right to vote has intrinsic qualifiers. The qualifiers have changed over time. Voting is a good example.

The rights that we do have are rights in relation to each other and to the state, because we are made in the image of God. I don't have more intrinsic value than you because we are both made in God's image. The concept of justice towards each flows from this fact. The state doesn't have the right to do injustice because of this fact. That is the basic nature of these rights, negative rights that prevent oppression and provide freedom/liberty. This is not the same as the so called right to healthcare or phones or housing.

We often though mistake rights towards each other with rights towards our creator. We have no rights with respect to him. He doesn't owe us life, health, success, etc. But we try to legislate equality of outcome because we perceive life to be unfair.

quote:

---

So you hold that no human action (murder for example) is objectively wrong?

---

Not really, but we are better off not killing each other. I'm not saying that I don't have morals, or that I don't think that a moral framework is conducive to human success, it's just that I don't think they actually exist outside of our own minds.

quote:

---

Pure pragmatism.

---

Yes.