Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Chart of the day: Obama recovery - Labor Participation disparity

Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:33 pm
Posted by Politiceaux
Member since Feb 2009
17654 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:33 pm

quote:

In June of 2009, the labor force participation rate was 65.7 percent (by way of comparison, the average over the last decade is 65.1 percent, while the peak was 66.5 percent in June of 2003). Since the end of the recession, that number has nose-dived. At the end of last month, it hit 62.8 percent — on par with what the U.S. experienced in the late 1970's (although at the time, the number was on the upswing).

What does this all mean? Rather than being the sign of a vibrant economy, the falling unemployment rate is actually an arithmetic artifact of the BLS head-counting process. If the labor force participation rate had held steady since 2009, the number of people in the labor force today would total nearly 162 million people. Instead, BLS reports the official number to be just shy of 155 million.

And thanks to how BLS calculates and reports the official unemployment rate, those 7 million people are not included among the ranks of the unemployed. Add them back in and you have an unemployment rate that averages a very stubborn 10.8 percent since the end of the recession.
LINK
This post was edited on 1/10/14 at 3:46 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69289 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:35 pm to
Obama gets a big fat "F" on his handling of the economy, and this chart literally shows it.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123887 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:38 pm to
quote:


What a crying damn shame!
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:40 pm to
Shut up!!!!!
Cris Christie caused a traffic jam.
Ann Romney has a horse.
Sexist! Racist!
Rabblrabblerabble!!!!
Posted by Oenophile Brah
The Edge of Sanity
Member since Jan 2013
7540 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

Obama gets a big fat "F" on his handling of the economy, and this chart literally shows it



Classic.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62409 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Obama gets a big fat "F" on his handling of the economy, and this chart literally shows it.



No doubt. He needs to reduce taxes, get out of healthcare, and have a reasonable #weeks for unemployment benefits, and cut off welfare/food stamp abuse...Its tough-love, that will work, but he doesn't have the stomach for it....And will go down as the worst President, just watch!
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51571 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:44 pm to
#FuzzyMath
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32235 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

and this chart literally shows it.
But will be seen by a few here but very few others. Maybe Jay Carney will have it with him today at his daily lying conference
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:55 pm to
it would be really interesting to see this since 2000.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
10821 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:58 pm to
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 3:01 pm to
its not the same as the chart above.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118758 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Chart of the day: Obama recovery - U-3 and U-6 disparity


I may be wrong but I don't think you using the term U6 correctly. The U6 print today was 13.1%. U3 is 6.7%. There will always be a disparity between U6 and U3, they are defined differently. LINK

The disparity you are showing is the difference between U3 with two different participation rates.
This post was edited on 1/10/14 at 3:35 pm
Posted by Politiceaux
Member since Feb 2009
17654 posts
Posted on 1/10/14 at 3:45 pm to
You are correct. Very boneheaded of me. Thanks.
Posted by EST
Investigating
Member since Oct 2003
17819 posts
Posted on 1/11/14 at 7:10 am to
Obama Admin's unemployment calculation:

Number of people employed +/- a number that will give an unemployment number that will make us look good = desired unemployment
Posted by CITWTT
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2005
31765 posts
Posted on 1/11/14 at 7:16 am to
100 million not in the labor market in the country at present. I know that a portion of that number will be ineligible to participate, but that number of people will not and does not explain away the bulk of that number and the reporting about our recovering economy. If the unemployment numbers were calculated by the standards from the 30's or even up to the late 80's what would be the percentage of unemployment in the nation? Why is it calculated now to only include those eligible for benefits?
This post was edited on 1/11/14 at 7:22 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram