- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Jackson St. Plans to Sue Grambling St. For Not Playing Last Week
Posted on 10/22/13 at 8:51 pm
Posted on 10/22/13 at 8:51 pm
Said they are suing due to the fact that they lost out on a lot of money this past week in not having a game.
just reported on ESPN, working on a link
what the frick? Seriously JSU?
Click here
ETA: just though it would be worked out between the two without the need of a suit. sheesh
just reported on ESPN, working on a link
what the frick? Seriously JSU?
Click here
ETA: just though it would be worked out between the two without the need of a suit. sheesh
This post was edited on 10/22/13 at 8:57 pm
16
Posted on 10/22/13 at 8:52 pm to LSUSoulja08
Have no problem with it. Was expected.
Posted on 10/22/13 at 8:53 pm to LSUSoulja08
How else are they supposed to get that lost revenue back due to no fault of their own?
Grambling should offer to pay for the damage they caused without making JSU sue.
Grambling should offer to pay for the damage they caused without making JSU sue.
This post was edited on 10/22/13 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 10/22/13 at 8:54 pm to John McClane
quote:
Was expected.
Expected, justified and reasonable.
Posted on 10/22/13 at 8:54 pm to LSUSoulja08
quote:
what the frick? Seriously JSU?
WTF were you expecting?
Posted on 10/22/13 at 8:55 pm to tigerpimpbot
I mean I get that, don't get me wrong.
I guess I just assumed that since grambling already have to pay a fine to the league, that if something like this was needed then they would just work it out within the league.
Guess I jsut didn't see a suit coming
I guess I just assumed that since grambling already have to pay a fine to the league, that if something like this was needed then they would just work it out within the league.
Guess I jsut didn't see a suit coming
Posted on 10/22/13 at 8:55 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:
Grambling should offer to pay for the damage they caused without making JSU sue.
this is what I assumed would happen
Posted on 10/22/13 at 8:58 pm to LSUSoulja08
Is Grambling still not playing?
Posted on 10/22/13 at 8:58 pm to LSUSoulja08
quote:
Said they are suing due to the fact that they lost out on a lot of money this past week in not having a game.
just reported on ESPN, working on a link
what the frick? Seriously JSU?
Click here
ETA: just though it would be worked out between the two without the need of a suit. sheesh
Can you imagine if Furman decided not to show up Saturday?
LSU would have to refund $3.6 million for tickets plus all lost revenue for concessions.
I get that JSU doesn't even get 10% of that amount of revenue on a gameday, but it's still money lost.
Posted on 10/22/13 at 9:00 pm to Vlad The Inhaler
nah they returned to practice today
Posted on 10/22/13 at 9:02 pm to LSUSoulja08
Wasn't it homecoming for JSU? Probably some butthurt alumni/donors too.
Posted on 10/22/13 at 9:03 pm to lsufan251875
Ga Tech threatened to sue Cumberland college, & we know how that ended.
Posted on 10/22/13 at 9:03 pm to tigerpimpbot
yeah it was
Posted on 10/22/13 at 9:09 pm to LSUSoulja08
What if grumbling showed up and gave Jackson state staff infections, would Jackson state have been happy then
Posted on 10/22/13 at 9:10 pm to Cwills684
They will get paid.
Posted on 10/22/13 at 9:10 pm to LSUSoulja08
Chokwe Lumba represented Tupac, suing Grambling shouldnt be hard
Posted on 10/22/13 at 9:23 pm to Cwills684
Posted on 10/22/13 at 9:26 pm to LSUSoulja08
What do you think LSU would do if Furman would suddenly forfeit their game this week?
Posted on 10/22/13 at 9:40 pm to LSUDAN1
Keep their check.
Posted on 10/22/13 at 9:49 pm to LSUSoulja08
The link says Jackson State will be seeking "indirect financial losses" on behalf of the city as well. That's a difficult estimate that could be hard to agree upon. Also "plans to pursue litigation" is not the same thing as demanding a trial; it's the first step in bringing the other side to the bargaining table. And a suit preserves their claim.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News