Started By
Message
locked post

Trent Richardson = Mark Ingram ? T or F

Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:48 pm
Posted by Shooter
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
6353 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:48 pm
Dude fricking blows
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18425 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:48 pm to
He was pretty decent last year but he's GARBAGE this year.

So your statement is true for this season
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
28724 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:49 pm to
Trent has talent, but he has horrible vision. Which equates to him being a bad running back.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33742 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:50 pm to
False.

Posted by saturday
Pronoun (Baw)
Member since Feb 2007
7095 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:51 pm to
Hes pretty terrible
Posted by wegotdatwood
Member since Aug 2009
17094 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:52 pm to
Mark Ingram is a borderline 3rd string RB.
Posted by Shooter
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
6353 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:52 pm to
The Colts have to be second guessing their decision to get this sorry piece of shite!
This post was edited on 10/14/13 at 8:53 pm
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33742 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:54 pm to
yeah, that was a costly trade.

the Browns will probably find a way to screw the picks/pick up though.
Posted by wegotdatwood
Member since Aug 2009
17094 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:57 pm to
The Chargers had a couple long drives.
Posted by 1ranter1
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
10396 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:58 pm to
Richardson >>> Ingram

Not really a compliment for Richardson, just how fricking terrible Ingram is
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64214 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:35 pm to
I'm assuming he's running for about 3 ypc
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82027 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:38 pm to
I think the Colts giving more and more snaps might help Trent improve his game otherwise he'll lose his starting spot soon.
Posted by Voorhies7
Rounding 3rd
Member since Oct 2012
5591 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:54 pm to
Trash.
Posted by Corn Dawg Nation
Member since Oct 2009
3530 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 10:25 pm to
Both suck. He has a slight lead over that pos Ingram though.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 10:29 pm to
I like how everyone says Trent Richardson sucks. Some guys take longer to develop in the pros. Marshawn Lynch wasn't exactly blowing the league apart when he came in; now he's a top 5 back. Give the dude a break. He's got skills, just has to develop.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

I'm assuming he's running for about 3 ypc

Tonight? 4ypc.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

Marshawn Lynch wasn't exactly blowing the league apart when he came in; now he's a top 5 back.


Marshawn had a couple outstanding years in Buffalo before the whole team went to shite. His career is rejuvenated in Seattle.
Posted by Voorhies7
Rounding 3rd
Member since Oct 2012
5591 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 10:50 pm to
You don't have time in fantasy football for players to develop.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 10:51 pm to
.4 more ypc his rookie year than Richardson. 4 less TDs. Richardson played 8 games with broken ribs. Just saying. Lets give the kid a chance to learn the game before crucifying him.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

You don't have time in fantasy football for players to develop.

Sure you do. Don't draft him.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram