Started By
Message
locked post

Harry Douglas for Mike Wallace Straight Up? 12 team Standard

Posted on 10/10/13 at 11:10 am
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
19358 posts
Posted on 10/10/13 at 11:10 am
I have Harry D, he is the Julio Owner.

My WRs:

V Jax
Amendola
D Moore
Harry D
Edelman

His:
Alshon
Wallace
Julio
K Stills (lol)
C Patterson (lol)


Thoughts?
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 10/10/13 at 11:16 am to
I would laugh at that offer. Harry D isn't that good.
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
37584 posts
Posted on 10/10/13 at 11:20 am to
I never understood why people would do trades 1 for 1 with the same position
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39582 posts
Posted on 10/10/13 at 11:36 am to
quote:

I never understood why people would do trades 1 for 1 with the same position



What's there not to understand? If you think your player isn't going to do as well as the other guy's, you trade straight up if they are evenly talented.

This trade is just stupid though.
Posted by LSU_PETE_2012
Dallas
Member since Jan 2013
389 posts
Posted on 10/10/13 at 11:38 am to
There's no way Harry is as good as Wallace. Just because he's the Julio owner doesn't mean he wants another Falcon's receiver.

This makes no sense.
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
19358 posts
Posted on 10/10/13 at 11:41 am to
Well he came to me with it. He also said it's just "an opener" and he would want Mendenhall if I could stand to part with him. He also owns David Wilson, so I think he is desperate.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39582 posts
Posted on 10/10/13 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Well he came to me with it.


If you can get rid of Harry Douglas for Mike Wallace you do it. If you can get a better deal due to his desperation, you do it.

His pain is your gain.
This post was edited on 10/10/13 at 11:52 am
Posted by krehn11
IA
Member since Jul 2011
1486 posts
Posted on 10/10/13 at 11:55 am to
quote:

What's there not to understand? If you think your player isn't going to do as well as the other guy's, you trade straight up if they are evenly talented.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72015 posts
Posted on 10/10/13 at 12:03 pm to
Mike Wallace is basically worthless. You can't even start him every week due to the inconsistency of him and Tannehill. Two nice games, then 3 games of 5 points or less.

Douglas Is sneaky. He's got Ryan throwing him the ball and he's actually a pretty good WR. They've played together for awhile. He had roddy, tony g, and Jenkins in front of him early in his career and then Julio came over.

He's now the 3rd option in an offense that has produced 3 pass catching studs the last few years. Could be option 2 depending on roddys health. The fact that ATL didn't make a major move at WR is telling.

I'd almost rather keep Douglas just to see what happens. Wallace owners will always be looking to deal him. You can get him later if you want
Posted by Indfanfromcol
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
14733 posts
Posted on 10/10/13 at 12:17 pm to
Falcons have a bye week, and even with that Roddy is expected to miss at least 1 game, if not more.

If you are desperate for a WR to start now, do the trade. I would keep him though. Even when Jackson comes back, the Falcons will still struggle to run, and Tony G will be double covered, especially in the end zone.

If you see Wallace sitting on your bench, don't do the trade. Douglas will be a low risk, high reward player if you are fine with your starters right now.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram