Started By
Message
locked post

Universal Life Insurance versus Term Life Insurance

Posted on 7/21/13 at 3:43 pm
Posted by Buck Dancer
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2008
4680 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 3:43 pm
Coming to the money board for advice. I currently have term life, but my agent is pushing hard to move to UL. I understand the term is only set price for 20 years and the UL is set for life. UL is about 3 times more expensive than the term.

What does the money board believe to be the better option? I don't currently invest money in anything else than my retirement plan. So I am not investor savvy, so taking the difference from the term and UL premium and investing it wouldn't be an educated action for me, meaning i would have no idea what i was doing.
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75195 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 4:01 pm to
Term is the way to go, it's cheaper. (20-50 per month) versus 300-400 for universal.

Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 4:01 pm to
How old are you and when to you purchase your original term life insurance policy/how many years left?

If you buy a universal life when you are 22 versus 40, your premium will be lower. So if you have had your term life for awhile, it is going to cost you more to get the same coverage than if you started that coverage when you were 5-10 years younger (depending how your life does it and if they still have age bands most don't anymore)


Be careful because most agents make a commission percentage based on your policy. For a number of companies it is form 30-50% (at least mine) for the initial year then anywhere from 2-6% renewal commission yearly.

That means if he either isn't your original agent or trying to make more, he will get a year where if he even resigned you to the same priced but new policy would see an approx 25% increase in commission which in reality is increased further when considering the premium rates go up. He will benefit from making this change. Just saying




I work in insurance and I'll explain how life insurance companies make money

On a life insurance policy, an insurance companies makes the majority of their profits based on investing your premiums. They are required to set aside reserves based on state mandated ratios to cover losses.

After their reserve ratios are met and commissions are paid out, all the excess money is set aside in investment accounts and invested to increase the value of the money. That is why it is possible to buy ROP (return of premium) riders which if you don't die on term for instance, they will pay you back all the premiums you paid. They make the money off the compounding interest of your premiums.

If you lapse your policy, say you decided "I have enough in savings and if I died my family could live on it" they get to pocket all your reserves built up for payment and your premiums. If you paid long enough it is the ideal situation for the insurance industry. Pay for 20 years, lapse policy, then die in the 21st. Company pockets profits and pay out nothing


So you need to figure out what you believe is worthwhile to you.


Questions when buying life insurance-

-What/who are you buying it for?
-What fits my needs?
-How much do you need?


1- Most people buy it for family but which part of your family factors into the next question

2- Based on your retirement savings and what you have built up + what you expect to have at the end of your term life, will you have enough to cover your family if you were to die 1 day after your term was up or 5 days? How much are you willing to bet on that fact?
Could you build up to that point by reinvesting the difference in the costs?


3- I am not going to advise you on how much you need but just see 2






This post was edited on 7/21/13 at 4:02 pm
Posted by Buck Dancer
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2008
4680 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 4:15 pm to
I'm 36, I was about to re do the term to get a cheaper price based on better health. So assume term is 20 years from today at around 1,120 (2 million in coverage). UL for 1 million is 4,522 a year and term for other million is $560.

I'm coming from paying around 1600 for 2 million term.

I'm buying from the same person I have used in the past. His selling point for the UL is I am locked in and only pay until age of 65. He is a family friend and believe he believes he is steering me in the right direction.

But, I am looking for outside opinions also.
Posted by Buck Dancer
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2008
4680 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 4:17 pm to
What happens when my term runs out at 56 and I have to get a new term policy/premium. At that point does the cost I have saved going term outweigh the amount I have saved up in the UL policy and having the UL policy at a set premium. Until 65 rather than term and premiums until death.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

my agent is pushing hard to move to UL
He gets exponentially higher commissions on UL versus term.

Term is the way to go, IMO.

After your kids are grown and gone, you won't really need life insurance unless your spouse is unemployable or you still have large debt.
Posted by Buck Dancer
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2008
4680 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 4:38 pm to
He brings up the point of what he is paying now for term at 55 and that he has to pay that until death. Where the UL you only have to pay premium until 65. We have three small kids and my wife doesn't work.

He brings up the point i can take money out of it down the line tax free.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

He brings up the point of what he is paying now for term at 55 and that he has to pay that until death.
Why does he have to pay it "until death." You can drop term and stop paying when you want to. It just means your coverage stops, too.

Why does a 65 year old with no kids to support, no debt to service and no trophy wife to keep happy need to have hundreds of thousands of dollars of life insurance? He doesn't is the correct answer.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39578 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 5:16 pm to
Ya its like having life insurance on your kid. Your kid is a money sink, and life insurance is supposed to replace support, not convert the body into a cash equivalent.
This post was edited on 7/21/13 at 5:17 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

He brings up the point i can take money out of it down the line tax free.

You can also take money out of your bank savings account tax free.

With the difference in premiums you would pay between term and UL, you can buy term insurance and put the difference you're not paying for life insurance in the bank, or some other savings option.

You will be wayyyyy ahead at age 65 in total savings balances if you do that.
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 5:26 pm to
If it was such a great deal, life insurance companies wouldn't offer it.


As long as you don't die between 55-65, you pretty much for sure come out on top
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123897 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

my agent is pushing hard to move to UL
quote:

taking the difference from the term and UL premium and investing it wouldn't be an educated action for me, meaning i would have no idea what i was doing
Sounds like your agent is in position to take advantage of that.

I don't mean that in either a good or a bad way necessarily.

(1) Regardless of your insurance decision, I'd encourage you to learn more about investments, and/or seek professional advice. Increase your capabilities and confidence in that area. It will serve you well in the long run.

(2) Analyze your long-term plans/goals/expectations. If you'd anticipate being able to "self-insure" by your mid-50's, TL is probably your best bet. "Self-insure" meaning you'd have enough savings/assets to cover all of varied needs when you die.

(3) As you've said, TL is much less expensive. However, if you're going to burn through the money you'd save via TL, than UL might well be the way to go despite its costs. At least with UL, you've got a cash-value policy you could draw on later.

It's a personal decision, but that does not mean there is no right or wrong answer. To the contrary, it's a decision almost always having a right or wrong answer based on your personal situation. Just takes a little self-knowledge and analysis to figure it out.


This post was edited on 7/22/13 at 12:28 am
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

Regardless of your insurance decision, I'd encourage you to learn more about investments, and/or seek professional advice.
Or, he could just do what I say....
Posted by Bayou Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
3658 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 5:56 pm to
So Universal Life is a good choice if you are irresponsible and/or a dumbass? Any other situations where it may be the appropriate choice?
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

So Universal Life is a good choice if you are irresponsible and/or a dumbass? Any other situations where it may be the appropriate choice?




Long term policies that you buy early in your life aren't terrible ideas. If you were to buy a permanent life policy when you are 23 and keep it for the duration of your life, you won't be spending a whole lot compare to buying term when you are 35 for 30 years

They price it all depending on how long they expect you to live so they can earn money on their long term investments compared to the expected payout of your policy


The older you get the more and more the gap grows between cost of term vs whole/UL .


If you were buying insurance say 10-15 years ago, it would almost without fail make the most sense to research what the age bands were and buy expensive polices right at your 29th birthday (when most age bands end)
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123897 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

So Universal Life is a good choice if you are irresponsible and/or a dumbass?
quote:

Any other situations where it may be the appropriate choice?
Not for me, but I'm sure there are. E.g., Perhaps for someone starting a family later in life, with relatively higher term costs?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123897 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

quote:

and/or seek professional advice.
Or, he could just do what I say....
. . . in that case he'd do very well
Posted by wegotdatwood
Member since Aug 2009
17094 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 6:25 pm to
To all:

When did you start purchasing life insurance? How much coverage?

I'm 24 and wife is 29 with a baby on the way.


Which companies can be trusted? It seems on the surface it would be full of scams.


Through work I think I have a 10k policy that would cover a funeral.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

If you were to buy a permanent life policy when you are 23
IMO, today's typical 23 year old (unmarried, no kids) would be foolish to be paying for something at that age when he absolutely does not need it and at a time when his earnings are probably at his career low.

When he turns 29 (or whatever) gets married, has children, THEN he buys whatever amount of life insurance he needs for his family in the event he assumes room temperature. And his earnings are probably higher so he can better afford to buy insurance.

The only risk is between the time he is 23 and the age when he starts to need life insurance, he becomes uninsurable or goes into a high risk category and can't get life insurance at a reasonable price. The odds of that happening, just like the insurance company knows and prices for, are low.
Posted by Bayou Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
3658 posts
Posted on 7/21/13 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

When did you start purchasing life insuranc? How much coverage?

31 / $1.2 Million Term / $75 per month through Amica

Ever since graduating college, I carried the 2-4x income group life policy offerred through employers. But I wanted to tack on a policy that would outlast a change of employers or especially being unemployed. Before we had kids I just wasn't too concerned about it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram