- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Benghazi Whistleblowers: Reinforcements told to stand down/Refusal of help
Posted on 5/6/13 at 4:07 pm to NbamaTiger90
Posted on 5/6/13 at 4:07 pm to NbamaTiger90
This thread should be stickied.
I'm noticing a glaring absence of the usual suspects refuting these claims.
I'm noticing a glaring absence of the usual suspects refuting these claims.
0
Posted on 5/6/13 at 4:09 pm to NbamaTiger90
quote:Is that it? Jeez, is he responsible for friendly fire incidents too?
Refer back to Alahunter's links.
Obama said the buck stops with him.
Pretty weak. Anyone else have an answer? It is a serious question. Is the plan to just create a lot of anger over anything that sounds bad?
Posted on 5/6/13 at 4:11 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
s that it? Jeez, is he responsible for friendly fire incidents too?
Pretty weak. Anyone else have an answer? It is a serious question. Is the plan to just create a lot of anger over anything that sounds bad?
wow
you people are sick.Posted on 5/6/13 at 4:13 pm to CptBengal
quote:What's the connection to Obama? Its his job to approve military action, not come up with his own plans of attack.
wow you people are sick.
Posted on 5/6/13 at 4:15 pm to CptBengal
They have an agenda. Letting those men die fits that agenda. It was done purposefully. Ambassador Stevens was targeted. The POTUS and Hill just didn't count on two American badasses mustering a defense. Obama hates the SEAL's. More have died under his watch than any other prez. Many under unusual circumstances. He knows these are the guys that can frick his plans all to shite.
Posted on 5/6/13 at 4:15 pm to mmcgrath
quote:Wow!
What's the connection to Obama?
Just wow.
Posted on 5/6/13 at 4:15 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
ts his job to approve military action,
and there was action that was DENIED.
read the thread you clueless tart.
Posted on 5/6/13 at 4:18 pm to RCDfan1950
quote:
All directed at "fundamentally changing this nation"...which IS - in effect - treason.
Bingo.
I said it back then, after the first time I heard Obama utter the words "fundamental transformation of America". I was like WTF?!?! That is as anti-American as it gets - in plain English. Yet idiots voted for him.
Posted on 5/6/13 at 4:41 pm to ScoopAndScore
quote:
All directed at "fundamentally changing this nation"...which IS - in effect - treason.
Bingo.
I said it back then, after the first time I heard Obama utter the words "fundamental transformation of America". I was like WTF?!?! That is as anti-American as it gets - in plain English. Yet idiots voted for him.
Exactly..If he don't like it-GTFO!!!!
I would like to lose my shoe in his arse. Unfortunately, I probably wouldn't even touch the sides or he'd enjoy it.
Posted on 5/6/13 at 4:56 pm to austingator
quote:
I'm really hoping the msm feels a little embarrassed and actually do what is right. If not we are truly fricked. No hope.
I'm not holding my breath, but surprised CBS actually covered it to this extent.
I'll never forget the morning after the the emails were relases, Good Mornign Americ lead with 5 min segment linking Romney to that rape comment of the IN Senate candidate. Sick.
Here is the bottom line with Benghazi:
1. It should not be a partisan issue. I'm not sure why any American is not outraged, in both the event and the cover-up/lack of clarity.
2. It's a shame it is a partisan issue bc of the election time cover-up. R's are overzealous bc it's an opportunity to nail his arse to the wall, and D's/media are entrenched in this cover-up bc they don't want to look weak/wrong.
Posted on 5/6/13 at 5:00 pm to CptBengal
quote:
and there was action that was DENIED by someone other than Obama.
FIFY
And so...
quote:right back atchya.
read the thread you clueless tart.
Posted on 5/6/13 at 5:36 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
mmcgrath
dude...I just don't know what to say...
an embassy is under attack on 9/11 and you don't think the POTUS is briefed and calling the shots?
I'll (for hypothetical sense) give evryone a pass on the attack itself...but my God, what transpired during and especially the cover-up... they all need to be held accountable.
Taking the CIA report and kicking it back to change the language, omitting AQ was involved, and then conjuring up some Youtube bullshite and making sure all MSM outlets covered said arrest to go along with the narrative? Your fricked in the head if you don't have a problem with it, no matter what party is in the WH
Posted on 5/6/13 at 5:46 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
FIFY
lolwut?
obama is the CiC you clown.
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:08 pm to lsuroadie
quote:yes. Of course.
an embassy is under attack on 9/11 and you don't think the POTUS is briefed
quote:a civilian calling the shots? No. He is asked for authorization when necessary. Technically he could jump in and tell all of the reinforcements to stand down, but if you believe he stood down career military without a hellish response you must be one of those conspiracy nuts.
and calling the shots?
This post was edited on 5/6/13 at 6:11 pm
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:12 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
a civilian calling the shots? No. He is asked for authorization when necessary.
sending a strike team into a sovereign foreign country counts....you know like the bin laden raid.
are you really this stupid or just trolling?
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:13 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
a civilian calling the shots?
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:15 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
but if you believe he stood down career military without a hellish response
You need to explain what a hellish response would be to the POTUS?
Please. Go ahead. I dare you.
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:17 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Technically he could jump in and tell all of the reinforcements to stand down, but if you believe he stood down career military without a hellish response you must be one of those conspiracy nuts.
your dodging. No I'm not a conspiracy nut
of course he's being advised but action/inaction the call is his to make, therefore he shoulders the success/blame of the course of action.
Secondly, he needs to lay down publicly what happened, LP already admitted he was on the phone with the personnel on the ground...if you don't think BHO was invloved you are insane.
No response to the resulting cover up? This is the tragedy...
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:29 pm to wickowick
quote:
Found this also, looks like no ships were in the area...
There's an entire AFB a thousand miles away.
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:34 pm to Springfield XD
quote:
There's an entire AFB a thousand miles away.
So fast movers at mach could be there lickedy split....seems like the claim nobody could get there is now bull as well.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News