Started By
Message
locked post

Fixed power or adjustable scope for .30-06

Posted on 4/5/13 at 9:28 am
Posted by ZacAttack
The Land Mass
Member since Oct 2012
6416 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 9:28 am
Looking for a scope for my .30-06. Realistically most shots will be less than 100 yards. That is why I was leaning towards just a 4x scope. Plus I feel that with less complicated machinery I can get more bang for my buck with a fixed power. Am I completely wrong, I know very little about scopes, so looking for any advice.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 9:29 am to
3-9 adjustable. Much more versatile. Reliability isn't much of an issue. A good scope isn't going to break unless you beat it.

Fixed 4 is for .22's and shite.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166136 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 9:30 am to
nikon buckmasters
Posted by JAB528
The Mexican Ocean
Member since Jun 2012
16870 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 9:32 am to
Adjustable.

3-9 or 4-12.
This post was edited on 4/5/13 at 9:33 am
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38727 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 9:38 am to
Get a 3x9.

I understand the thinking, because I always leave mine set on about 4x. But you never know when you may hunt with a friend that will sit you on a pipeline where you can see 500 yards.

Posted by TexasTiger
Katy TX
Member since Sep 2003
5324 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 9:46 am to
Fixed is for small game guns / pistols / shotguns...get the adjustable. Depending on your budget there are lot of good options in alot of differnet price ranges.
Posted by LSUEnvy
Hou via Lake Chas
Member since May 2011
12087 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Adjustable.

3-9 or 4-12.
Posted by faxis
La.
Member since Oct 2007
7773 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 10:04 am to
The only advantage of a fixed is light gathering, but considering how good light gathering is in adjustables these days... I'd get an adjustable. Leupold is now making the Redfield scopes which are pretty damn good bang for the buck for a hunting rifle. They're no Vari-X III but they cost a third of that.
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11877 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 10:08 am to
I have a redfield and am very happy with its performance. I agree with everyone else too. There are some great bang for buck scopes out there that aren't fixed.
Posted by oleyeller
Vols, Bitch
Member since Oct 2012
32021 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 10:15 am to
bapple do you have any pics of this setup?
Posted by JBD1865
Texas
Member since May 2011
87 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 10:16 am to
quote:

nikon buckmasters

+1
This post was edited on 4/5/13 at 10:17 am
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11877 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 10:17 am to
Yessir.

Posted by ZacAttack
The Land Mass
Member since Oct 2012
6416 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 10:20 am to
What redfield is that?
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11877 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 10:34 am to
4-12x by 40mm. I can easily shoot 1/2 Moa with this setup.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 10:44 am to
If most of your shots are going to be under 100 yards, I'd go with something lower powered on the low end, like 1.5 - 2.0. That helps with target acquisition at shorter range.

Leupold VX-3, for example


Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48930 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 10:49 am to
3x9x50

Trust me on this



You can get a very good scope for $200
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 11:08 am to
quote:

4-12x by 40mm. I can easily shoot 1/2 Moa with this setup.

I guess it all depends on if he's going for a range gun or a hunting rifle.
Posted by ZacAttack
The Land Mass
Member since Oct 2012
6416 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 12:34 pm to
Hunting
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89483 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

3-9 adjustable. Much more versatile.


I'm here with this.

I would only go with a fixed power scope on a centerfire if I was covering a fairly small engagement area (prairie dogs/coyotes).

I guess the other issue would be, low light conditions, I could probably get a higher resolution fixed for less than a comparable variable, but still, it would be better to spend the extra and get a little more scope than you might need, but one that could be used a lot more.

Fixed are great for target shooting, though.

Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/5/13 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Hunting

I'm no expert, but some guys like putting the Hubble Telescope on their rifles so they can pick the fleas off a doe before they take her down. Personally I prefer an objective < 40mm, bigger than 36 or so and it just seems too bulky for me. Also it lifts your sight line up off of your bore increasing parallax and lifting your cheek off the stock. The big objectives do offer better light, but less magnification doesn't require as much light.

Also, with increased magnification it's harder to keep the sight picture steady. Not a problem if you're on a bench, but offhand it becomes a problem. 1/2 moa hunting within 100 yards (with a 30-06!) is a bit of overkill, imo.

One last thing, a 30-06 delivers quite a recoil not just to your shoulder, but to the scope as well. You want a scope that can stand up to that shock without losing its zero. I would avoid the cheaper scopes on anything above a .22.

Again, I ain't no expert, that's all just my BS opinion.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram