Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
cdaniel76
Member since Feb 2008
16249 posts

Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control



Columbine survivor Evan Todd released an open letter to President Barack Obama on Wednesday in which he offers a point-by-point analysis of proposed firearms control initiatives, dismissing them as ineffective and dangerous to Americans’ rights. Read Todd’s open letter to Obama, below.

quote:

Mr. President,

As a student who was shot and wounded during the Columbine massacre, I have a few thoughts on the current gun debate. In regards to your gun control initiatives:

Universal Background Checks

First, a universal background check will have many devastating effects. It will arguably have the opposite impact of what you propose. If adopted, criminals will know that they can not pass a background check legally, so they will resort to other avenues. With the conditions being set by this initiative, it will create a large black market for weapons and will support more criminal activity and funnel additional money into the hands of thugs, criminals, and people who will do harm to American citizens.


Second, universal background checks will create a huge bureaucracy that will cost an enormous amount of tax payers dollars and will straddle us with more debt. We cannot afford it now, let alone create another function of government that will have a huge monthly bill attached to it.

Third, is a universal background check system possible without universal gun registration? If so, please define it for us. Universal registration can easily be used for universal confiscation. I am not at all implying that you, sir, would try such a measure, but we do need to think about our actions through the lens of time.

It is not impossible to think that a tyrant, to the likes of Mao, Castro, Che, Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, and others, could possibly rise to power in America. It could be five, ten, twenty, or one hundred years from now — but future generations have the natural right to protect themselves from tyrannical government just as much as we currently do. It is safe to assume that this liberty that our forefathers secured has been a thorn in the side of would-be tyrants ever since the Second Amendment was adopted.

Ban on Military-Style Assault Weapons

The evidence is very clear pertaining to the inadequacies of the assault weapons ban. It had little to no effect when it was in place from 1994 until 2004. It was during this time that I personally witnessed two fellow students murder twelve of my classmates and one teacher. The assault weapons ban did not deter these two murderers, nor did the other thirty-something laws that they broke.

Gun ownership is at an all time high. And although tragedies like Columbine and Newtown are exploited by ideologues and special-interest lobbying groups, crime is at an all time low. The people have spoken. Gun store shelves have been emptied. Gun shows are breaking attendance records. Gun manufacturers are sold out and back ordered. Shortages on ammo and firearms are countrywide. The American people have spoken and are telling you that our Second Amendment shall not be infringed.

10-Round Limit for Magazines

Virginia Tech was the site of the deadliest school shooting in U.S. history. Seung-Hui Cho used two of the smallest caliber hand guns manufactured and a handful of ten round magazines. There are no substantial facts that prove that limited magazines would make any difference at all.

Second, this is just another law that endangers law-abiding citizens. I’ve heard you ask, “why does someone need 30 bullets to kill a deer?”

Let me ask you this: Why would you prefer criminals to have the ability to out-gun law-abiding citizens? Under this policy, criminals will still have their 30-round magazines, but the average American will not. Whose side are you on?

Lastly, when did the government get into the business of regulating “needs?” This is yet another example of government overreaching and straying from its intended purpose.

Selling to Criminals

Mr. President, these are your words: “And finally, Congress needs to help, rather than hinder, law enforcement as it does its job. We should get tougher on people who buy guns with the express purpose of turning around and selling them to criminals. And we should severely punish anybody who helps them do this.”

Why don’t we start with Eric Holder and thoroughly investigate the Fast and Furious program?

Furthermore, the vast majority of these mass murderers bought their weapons legally and jumped through all the hoops — because they were determined to murder. Adding more hoops and red tape will not stop these types of people. It doesn’t now — so what makes you think it will in the future? Criminals who cannot buy guns legally just resort to the black market.

Criminals and murderers will always find a way.

Critical Examination

Mr. President, in theory, your initiatives and proposals sound warm and fuzzy — but in reality they are far from what we need. Your initiatives seem to punish law-abiding American citizens and enable the murderers, thugs, and other lowlifes who wish to do harm to others.

Let me be clear: These ideas are the worst possible initiatives if you seriously care about saving lives and also upholding your oath of office. There is no dictate, law, or regulation that will stop bad things from happening — and you know that. Yet you continue to push the rhetoric. Why?

You said, “If we can save just one person it is worth it.” Well here are a few ideas that will save more that one individual:

First, forget all of your current initiatives and 23 purposed executive orders. They will do nothing more than impede law-abiding citizens and breach the intent of the Constitution. Each initiative steals freedom, grants more power to an already-overreaching government, and empowers and enables criminals to run amok.

Second, press Congress to repeal the “Gun Free Zone Act.” Don’t allow America’s teachers and students to be endangered one-day more. These parents and teachers have the natural right to defend themselves and not be looked at as criminals. There is no reason teachers must disarm themselves to perform their jobs. There is also no reason a parent or volunteer should be disarmed when they cross the school line.

This is your chance to correct history and restore liberty. This simple act of restoring freedom will deter would-be murderers and for those who try, they will be met with resistance.

Mr. President, do the right thing, restore freedom, and save lives. Show the American people that you stand with them and not with thugs and criminals.

Respectfully,

Severely Concerned Citizen, Evan M. Todd



This post was edited on 2/20 at 9:01 pm



Back to top
Share:
cdaniel76
Member since Feb 2008
16249 posts

re: Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control


I've never seen this video... WOW!!!

LINK #!






Back to top
JAB528
LSU Fan
The Mexican Ocean
Member since Jun 2012
15014 posts

re: Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control


Merica frick yeah.





Back to top
El Josey Wales
LSU Fan
Greater Geismar
Member since Nov 2007
22710 posts

re: Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control


quote:

Merica frick yeah.








Back to top
DrTyger
LSU Fan
Lake Charles
Member since Oct 2009
21967 posts

re: Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control


This is clearly one of those bitter nut jobs clinging to his guns and religion that Obama talked about.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
OTIS2
LSU Fan
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
27859 posts

re: Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control


I'm certain our Emperor will head the man's advice...





Back to top
  Replies (0)
SportTiger1
LSU Fan
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
3641 posts

re: Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control


Thanks for sharing the letter. But that video was really hard to watch.





Back to top
Ace Midnight
LSU Fan
Currently asymptomatic
Member since Dec 2006
33397 posts
 Online 

re: Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control


quote:

But that video was really hard to watch.



Sheep for the slaughter...

Really sad.






Back to top
ZacAttack
Mississippi St. Fan
The Land Mass
Member since Oct 2012
4590 posts
 Online 

re: Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control


That video was tough to watch. An armed teacher may not have stopped them, but at least it would have given the students time to escape.





Back to top
Rayvegas1484
LSU Fan
Zebedee
Member since Feb 2010
2361 posts

re: Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control


Fantastic letter merica





Back to top
  Replies (0)
uway
USA Fan
Member since Sep 2004
19599 posts

re: Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control


quote:

An armed teacher may not have stopped them,


Those 2 a-holes surely wouldn't have been walking around non-chalantly as they were at the tail end of that video. Even nutjob murderous teenagers are afraid of bullets flying in their direction.






Back to top
RBWilliams8
LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
47098 posts

re: Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control


Ferk yeah!





Back to top
  Replies (0)
DrTyger
LSU Fan
Lake Charles
Member since Oct 2009
21967 posts

re: Columbine Survivor Pens Bold Open Letter To Obama Rejecting Gun Control


As Mr. Colion Noir said, these guys are corner campers. They do this kind of stuff because they know no body will be shooting back at them.

Every time one of these things happens once the good guys with guns show up they either give up or kill themselves.






Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top