True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
baybeefeetz
the now
Member since Sep 2009
13592 posts

True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


posed by al Qaeda and its associated forces."

For a more challenging t or f, take this one (with specificity, if you please:

Were the target of a lethal operation (overseas against an al qaeda planner) a US citizen with rights under the 4th amendment, that individual's citizenship would not immunize him from a lethal operation.







Back to top
Share:
constant cough
LSU Fan
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
35496 posts
 Online 

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


The President himself is the threat.





Back to top
JohnnyKilroy
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
Member since Oct 2012
8361 posts

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


quote:

Were the target of a lethal operation (overseas against an al qaeda planner) a US citizen with rights under the 4th amendment, that individual's citizenship would not immunize him from a lethal operation.



Lethal force would be ok if he was engaged and resisted with violent/lethal force.

If the government is going in to specifically eliminate him with 0 attempt made to extradite/arrest/whatever then no, lethal force is not okay in this situation.







Back to top
Bmath
LSU Fan
TX
Member since Aug 2010
6215 posts

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


Doesn't the military take an oath to to protect against all threats both foreign and domestic?

However, I think targeted killing without any due process is a slippery slope.






Back to top
kingbob
LSU Fan
St. Amant, LA
Member since Nov 2010
17439 posts

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


If it is not an American citizen, of course. Then you have to abide by the War Powers Act and get clearance from respective countries if you have to violate their air space.

If it is an American citizen, you have to arrest them and charge them with treason (possibly attempt extradition), and then try them. If they're guilty and your intelligence is good, they will be found guilty and executed. If your intelligence is bad and they are not a terrorist, then they will walk. That's the way it is supposed to work.






Back to top
MoreOrLes
LSU Fan
Member since Nov 2008
16556 posts

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


True

And its unconstitutional IMO






Back to top
CGSC Lobotomy
Samford Fan
Lewis-McChord, Washington
Member since Sep 2011
14109 posts

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


Define "respond" first.





Back to top
baybeefeetz
the now
Member since Sep 2009
13592 posts

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


bomb or shoot





Back to top
hawkster
Member since Aug 2010
4998 posts

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


quote:

The President himself is the threat.


Put Hal 9000 logic into a drone and let it decide how to handle the president.







Back to top
Zed
Alabama Fan
Member since Feb 2010
7913 posts

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


If the target of the operation is a US citizen, an attempt at apprehension should be made IMO.





Back to top
Broketec
LSU Fan
Dumpster Fire
Member since Sep 2006
1176 posts

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


So no one flinches when we shoot Alqueda on the ground, face to face or when we drone strike insurgents...

But if one of those insurgents that are part of Alqueda happens to be a U.S. Citizen who basically told america to go frick itself, we should go in with hand cuffs and try to capture him so we can just kill him later?

I understand the slippery slope blahty blah...but if a citizen is now a member of Alqueda, why should his citizenship spare him the same fate as the rest of Alqueda...seriously? Are we trying to capture this guy so we can rehabilitate this fella and return him to the fold of Americanism?



This post was edited on 2/5 at 4:37 pm


Back to top
Zed
Alabama Fan
Member since Feb 2010
7913 posts

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


quote:

So no one flinches when we shoot Alqueda on the ground, face to face or when we drone strike insurgents...

But if one of those insurgents that are part of Alqueda happens to be a U.S. Citizen who basically told america to go frick itself, we should go in with hand cuffs and try to capture him so we can just kill him later?
An attempt at apprehension should be made regardless of citizenship status provided the circumstances allow for it IMO.






Back to top
Poodlebrain
LSU Fan
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
15003 posts

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


George W. Bush asserted the President has, or at least should have, this authority. He asked for approval to fight the War on Terror, and Congress pretty much gave him the authority to do so. Since there has been no laws passed ending the War on Terror, the authority still exists, and Obama can exercise the authority.

Extending that authority to cover American citizens in a manner that violates the Constitution's definition of treason, violates the 5th Amendment and the 6th Amendment is a different matter.






Back to top
doubleb
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
6047 posts

re: True or False: "The President has authority to respond to the imminent threat


It isn't like we are combatting criminals here, it's about us combatting armed guerillas who will do almost anything to kill Americans and harm our country.

Like it or not Obama is Commander In Chief and the CIC has got to do what he has to do to protect us even if we don't like him.

If an American citizen is allied with Al Qaeda, it's no difference if he was allied with the Nazis, the British in 1812, or a Southern soldier fighting under the Stars and Bars.

Sorry, when you join the enemy, and fight with the enemy, all the rights you have in the Constitution are flushed down the toilet.

It has to be that way.






Back to top


Back to top




//