- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Which of These Is the Best Superbowl City?
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:19 am
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:19 am
New Orleans, San Diego, or Miami. Poll question on ESPN home page.
This post was edited on 1/28/13 at 11:20 am
17
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:19 am to Patrick_Bateman
Narnia
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:20 am to Patrick_Bateman
I did Miami when the Saints when. Witnessed two SBs here in NOLA.
New Orleans by far out of those two.
New Orleans by far out of those two.
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:20 am to Patrick_Bateman
New Orleans
stadium downtown, tons of hotel space downtown, tourist stuff downtown, generally good weather in January and a police force that can handle big crowds.
Pretty much all sportswriters and other who attend on a regular basis say NOLA is the best.
Stadiums being out in the middle of nowhere hurts Miami and San Diego.
stadium downtown, tons of hotel space downtown, tourist stuff downtown, generally good weather in January and a police force that can handle big crowds.
Pretty much all sportswriters and other who attend on a regular basis say NOLA is the best.
Stadiums being out in the middle of nowhere hurts Miami and San Diego.
This post was edited on 1/28/13 at 11:22 am
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:23 am to Cosmo
If Miami had built a stadium at the site of the Orange Bowl, then it'd probably be better than New Orleans, but having a stadium an hour away from downtown seems silly for a Super Bowl.
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:24 am to saintsfan92612
quote:
If Miami had built a stadium at the site of the Orange Bowl, then it'd probably be better than New Orleans,
naw, because that site is surrounded by a cesspool of Cubans.
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:25 am to Cosmo
well, they aren't going to build a stadium on South Beach so I was trying to be practical
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:27 am to saintsfan92612
New Orleans. For convenience of being able to walk everywhere.
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:32 am to Patrick_Bateman
Pasadena
I don't know why the NFL has gone back there? 5 Super Bowls and yet nothing the last 20 years.
I don't know why the NFL has gone back there? 5 Super Bowls and yet nothing the last 20 years.
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:34 am to Zamoro10
quote:
I don't know why the NFL has gone back there?
Seriously?
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:34 am to Patrick_Bateman
Probably New Orleans or Miami. I wish they would bring the Super Bowl back to Los Angeles though. The Rose Bowl is an awesome venue for big football games.
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:36 am to Zamoro10
quote:
Pasadena
I don't know why the NFL has gone back there? 5 Super Bowls and yet nothing the last 20 years.
There's an NFL rule stating you have to have an NFL team in order for a city to host a Superbowl
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:37 am to Zamoro10
You really dont know why?
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:43 am to TigerintheNO
The NFL makes the rules...so, the question...'why they haven't gone back there' is a question...why they think it's important to so stipulate if they in fact what a team in L.A.?
They can make/unmake whatever rules they want.
They can make/unmake whatever rules they want.
This post was edited on 1/28/13 at 11:44 am
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:44 am to Zamoro10
quote:
why they think it's important to so stipulate if they in fact what a team in L.A.?
owners of teams who want a Super Bowl in their city would be pissed.
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:51 am to Patrick_Bateman
Went to the SB in Miami. It would be miami by a long shot if not for having to go out to ft lauderdale for the game. New Orleans edges it out IMO
This post was edited on 1/28/13 at 11:54 am
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:51 am to Cosmo
quote:
owners of teams who want a Super Bowl in their city would be pissed.
+1. If any city was allowed to host a Super Bowl, cities like Las Vegas, Orlando and San Antonio would have hosted Super Bowls instead of Indianapolis, Jacksonville and Detroit.
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:52 am to DelU249
Take that back. It's miami. It's just so perfect for the SB
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:55 am to Bench McElroy
quote:
If any city was allowed to host a Super Bowl, cities like Las Vegas, Orlando and San Antonio would have hosted Super Bowls instead of Indianapolis, Jacksonville and Detroit.
Moscow, ID (or Russia for that matter) should be higher on the list than Detroit.
Posted on 1/28/13 at 11:57 am to DelU249
quote:
Take that back. It's miami. It's just so perfect for the SB
Miami has certainly hosted more memorable Super Bowls than New Orleans. Miami has been the host to games such as Super Bowl XXIII between the Bengals and 49ers, the two SB clashes between the Steelers and Cowboys in the '70s, the Colts/Cowboys SB that was won on a last second field goal and of course, Super Bowl III. All New Orleans has is the Super Bowl between the Patriots and Rams. All of their other Super Bowls were either snoozers or complete blowouts.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News