- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:13 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:And LaMarcus Aldridge over Blake Griffin
Duncan should be starting over Dwight anyway
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:13 pm to REG861
quote:
Somehow is 20 ppg average has seemed underwhelming
Fewer minutes and fewer shots. He's shooting the highest percentage of his career this year. Plus playing the best defense on the team in my opinion. If his usage was higher, you'd notice more, but he's having an exceptional year. He's still the best SG in the game when you take into account both offense and defense.
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:13 pm to genro
quote:
I guess the east is pretty thin in the SG position, considering Joe Johnson was the only one I could think of
Paul George. Glad he made it.
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:15 pm to Rittdog
quote:
He puts up good stats....but his team doesnt win.
Luke Walton has been getting minutes. Luke Walton.
This post was edited on 1/24/13 at 7:16 pm
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:15 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
Paul George. Glad he made it.
Agree, Paul George is deserving, but he's been playing SF mostly with Granger out. Not that it really matters.
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:16 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
Duncan should be starting over Dwight anyway.
This is the worse fact in all of this. This year's Dwight starting in the ASG over Duncan.
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:22 pm to jturn17
quote:
Are people still going by first month of the season Wade?
Well, that is about 40% of this season so far.
I am disappointed Yao Ming is not playing alongside Tracy McGrady.
This post was edited on 1/24/13 at 7:23 pm
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:24 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
No UK players, no watch.
Where did Rondo go to school?
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:26 pm to DelU249
quote:
@ Dwight howard
big time lawl
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:28 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
Well, that is about 40% of this season so far.
Please go compare Wade's numbers to other guards in the East. Or the West for that matter.
I'm not a PER end all be all guy, but there are 3 guards in the league with a better PER than Wade (CP3, Westbrook, Kobe), and Wade is the best defender of the 4. He's shooting the highest FG% of his career. He's probably been the second best guard in the league this year behind CP3.
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:28 pm to Davie Crocket
quote:
East>West
Hell naw
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:31 pm to jturn17
I would still have Wade starting in the East by a good bit. Having a bad month is kind of a big deal when the season has only been a little over 2.5 months though.
I would probably take both Westbrook and Kobe over Wade just because what they do is in a higher volume. Wade's fg% is nice, but I would want more raw production and a higher usage rate from. Obviously, all of those guards are top 10 players in the league though.
I would probably take both Westbrook and Kobe over Wade just because what they do is in a higher volume. Wade's fg% is nice, but I would want more raw production and a higher usage rate from. Obviously, all of those guards are top 10 players in the league though.
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:33 pm to DelU249
quote:
@ Dwight howard
Leading Western Conference centers in rebounding and blocks, 2nd in FG%, 3rd in points. Totally doesn't deserve to be there
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:37 pm to Rittdog
quote:
NBA All-Star Teams Announced Kyrie Irving does not belong. He puts up good stats....but his team doesnt win.
Really not sure if serious.
By your theory Kobe shouldn't be in either, because the Lakers aren't winning crap.
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:39 pm to Rittdog
quote:
Kyrie Irving does not belong.
He puts up good stats....but his team doesnt win.
So kobe shouldn't make it either?
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:43 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
Westbrook and Kobe over Wade
Why though? Only one of them is a good defender. I could see a case for Westbrook, but I'd disagree. But Kobe can't defend anyone, except Brandon Jennings.
Kobe's defense is a big reason why the Lakers are awful.
Posted on 1/24/13 at 7:52 pm to jturn17
Kobe gives me seven more minutes and 8.7 points more per game at a pretty decent clip of 46.5% FG%.
While Wade is clearly a better defender and shoots for a higher percentage, 7 extra minutes of Kobe makes him more valuable.
Westbrook is in a similar boat as Kobe with his 43 mpg.
All three have very similar PER's in the 23's, so their per minute effectiveness is pretty close (this of course, unfairly disadvantages Wade because defense is harder to accurately follow and evaluate with PER), but give me those extra seven or eight minutes.
If the question was who would you rather have x number of minutes, then Wade is a very logical answer. On the other hand, both Kobe and Westbrook are worth IMO on a per game (and therefore per season) basis than Wade.
Furthermore, Westbrook never misses a game (300+ consecutive games played). Kobe is incredibly consistent in games played, which is amazing for his or any age. Wade pretty much always misses more games than both of them combined.
ETA: I also do not like to judge players on a per-minute basis, since not all players play the same amount.
I would be in total support of creating PER x minutes played = SLPER (season long PER or something like that). I realize that EWA and VA are variations of that though, but I would like to see PER extrapolated and the math is super easy to do that.
While Wade is clearly a better defender and shoots for a higher percentage, 7 extra minutes of Kobe makes him more valuable.
Westbrook is in a similar boat as Kobe with his 43 mpg.
All three have very similar PER's in the 23's, so their per minute effectiveness is pretty close (this of course, unfairly disadvantages Wade because defense is harder to accurately follow and evaluate with PER), but give me those extra seven or eight minutes.
If the question was who would you rather have x number of minutes, then Wade is a very logical answer. On the other hand, both Kobe and Westbrook are worth IMO on a per game (and therefore per season) basis than Wade.
Furthermore, Westbrook never misses a game (300+ consecutive games played). Kobe is incredibly consistent in games played, which is amazing for his or any age. Wade pretty much always misses more games than both of them combined.
ETA: I also do not like to judge players on a per-minute basis, since not all players play the same amount.
I would be in total support of creating PER x minutes played = SLPER (season long PER or something like that). I realize that EWA and VA are variations of that though, but I would like to see PER extrapolated and the math is super easy to do that.
This post was edited on 1/24/13 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 1/24/13 at 8:08 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
Lee breaks the 15-year GSW All-Star drought.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News