Started By
Message
locked post

Offense vs Defense in the NFL? Which wins championships?

Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:34 pm
Posted by BlueIndian420
Member since Feb 2010
1876 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:34 pm
Which one do you guys feel is more important in today's NFL? Obviously we have always heard that D wins championships, but is that true anymore?
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59067 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:35 pm to
Both win about an equal amount of the time.
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37133 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:38 pm to
I think you can compensate for both. Steelers and Packers are recent examples of both. Offense seems to rule in the NFL right now
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61438 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:40 pm to
Balance wins. Even if you skew one way you really need to be at least top 10ish, or above average, on the other side of the ball.
Posted by LSUcdro
Republic of West Florida
Member since Sep 2009
11126 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Balance wins. Even if you skew one way you really need to be at least top 10ish, or above average, on the other side of the ball.



This. I think it is pretty balanced in the NFL
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5247 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:46 pm to
Definitely offense.
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:49 pm to
In the NFL Offense wins games, the defense wins the Super Bowl. I don't mean the defense will do enough to get you there and win, I mean that WHEN it's played the defense wins it for you.
Posted by Crompdaddy8
Jimmy Rustler
Member since Nov 2009
10569 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:51 pm to
NFL: Elite QB. Colts went 2-14 a year after Manning left. Denver is 13-3 now.

College: Defense and running game. don't need elite QB or elite WR. control the LOS.
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 12:53 pm
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112238 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

NFL: Elite QB. Colts went 2-14 a year after Manning left. Denver is 13-3 now.


I hope you realize how awful this logic is
Posted by TigerMan327
Elsewhere
Member since Feb 2011
5143 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:59 pm to
Denver also won a playoff game last year with the shittiest QB in the league and we don't know if the broncos will even win a playoff game yet this year with him.

Even though I'm sure they will.. You do not need an elite QB to be good. 3 rookie qbs made it to the playoffs this year. Alex Smith almost made it to the superbowl last year and was average and his replacement now is average.

Eli Manning isnt elite and he has won 2 with good defense, good running game, and above average qb play.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141660 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 12:59 pm to
It used to be D but the league has manipulated the rules so much in favor of the O it's now you win with QB&D
Posted by Dubosed
Gulf Breeze
Member since Nov 2012
7036 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:36 pm to
If you have an elite QB,a quality o-line,and a defense that can create turnovers,you can beat anybody.
Posted by texastiger38
Member since Sep 2007
25084 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Packers


Didn't they have a really good defense that year?

I think Woodson won the Defensive player of the year
Posted by iAmBatman
The Batcave
Member since Mar 2011
12382 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:46 pm to
coaches
Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15520 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:16 pm to
We hear this a lot. That it is a QB league now and an offense driven league. But the numbers just don't jive with what seems like an obvious transition in the NFL. From a thread awhile back:

LINK:

Defense wins championships:

(total offense)/(total defense/scoring defense)

Great D:
_(9) / (5/_2) 2010 Green Bay
(22) / (1/_1) 2008 Steelers
(16) / (7/17) 2007 Giants
(15) / (4/_3) 2005 Steelers
(17) / (7/_1) 2003 Patriots
(24) / (1/_1) 2002 Buccaneers
(19) / (8/_6) 2001 Patriots
(16) / (2/_1) 2000 Ravens

More O than D:

_(8) / (27/25) 2011 Giants
_(1) / (25/20) 2009 Saints
_(3) / (21/23) 2006 Colts
_(7) / (_9/_3) 2004 Patriots <- just a great team on both sides of the ball



User Error:
(19) / (8/6) 2001 Patriots, how did they win it all? User error. They had a solid D.



edit: update
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 3:56 pm
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36587 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:21 pm to
Saints o made the story's that year but their defense was making a lot of turnovers something they have failed to do since.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112238 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Anomaly: (19) / (24) 2001 Patriots,how did they win it all?


They did it for Murica
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64108 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:44 pm to
If you have an elite qb and passing game you simply need a decent pass rush and a decent situational defense .
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71339 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

(total offense)/(total defense)



Thats your problem there.

Use scoring defense, it's a much better indicator.

quote:

(19) / (24) 2001 Patriots,how did they win it all?



By not listening to John Madden's pussy tactics.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59067 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

2001 Patriots,how did they win it all?


The NFL hates the Raiders
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram