Started By
Message
locked post

Trade Opinion: Foster for Gronkowski

Posted on 10/3/12 at 12:52 pm
Posted by TheMightyTerrier
Member since Nov 2010
2099 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 12:52 pm
Your opinions on this trade in a standard scoring league, 2 WR, 2 RB, 1TE, 1 FL:

GET:
Arian Foster
Scott Chandler
SEA D

GIVE:
Stevan Ridley
Rob Gronkowski
ARI D

Here is my team currently:
QB: A. Rodgers
RB: M. Jones-Drew, M. Lynch, D. McFadden, S. Ridley, M. Leshoure
WR: H. Nicks, E. Decker, S. Johnson, V. Jackson, D. Bowe, T. Smith
TE: R. Gronkowski
K: D. Akers
DEF: CHI, ARI

Posted by Duckman13
Tiger Stadium
Member since Dec 2006
3047 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 12:54 pm to
seems pretty fair to me
Posted by lsurulz1515
Member since Mar 2007
5673 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 12:56 pm to
Your teams solid without Foster, but Foster is hard to pass up. It really just depends if you're ok with getting rid of gronk for an avg TE. Looks like you could be gaining points from Foster that you are losing in Gronk.

Overall, its seems like a pretty fair trade
Posted by DrunkHat
Lake Charles
Member since Apr 2012
543 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 1:26 pm to
Would not do.


Btw, is this a 4-6 team league?
This post was edited on 10/3/12 at 1:27 pm
Posted by AmosMosesAndTwins
Lake Charles
Member since Apr 2010
17886 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 1:32 pm to
Stick with what you have.
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 1:37 pm to
You lose that trade, and it may not be close.
Posted by LSUWhoDat
Member since Jun 2012
932 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 1:43 pm to
you should then try to swing McFadden for a better TE
Posted by Nonetheless
Luka doncic = goat
Member since Jan 2012
33004 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Btw, is this a 4-6 team league?


Posted by FOAK
Member since Mar 2011
324 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 1:55 pm to
You look fine at rb, you should be looking to improve your wr position, not rb.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64225 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 1:58 pm to
how does one get rodgers, gronk, MJD (even with holdout), lynch, mcfadden. Those are all 1-2 rd picks
Posted by TheMightyTerrier
Member since Nov 2010
2099 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

how does one get rodgers, gronk, MJD (even with holdout), lynch, mcfadden. Those are all 1-2 rd picks


Haha. Our league 5 years ago was a 12 man league. Now people have moved away, dropped out, etc. and it is an 8 man keep 3 players at each year end. I kept Rodgers, Gronkowski, and Lynch. McFadden was my first round pick and I play with a bunch of pusses who wouldn't take MJD so I did.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64225 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 2:37 pm to
wow... nice
Posted by Guess
Down The Road
Member since Jun 2009
3769 posts
Posted on 10/3/12 at 3:00 pm to
I like the side you would be getting a little better, you are stacked at RB , but Foster will immediately make you better and in the long run I think that Ari D/ST is better because of the bigger potential for returns. Those two should more than make up the loss in production from your tight end slot.

Has to be a small leauge you're pretty much stacked every where already. It would be better for you if you could keep Gronk and trade one of your backs for some receiver help.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram