Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Jones did NOT touch first

Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:46 pm
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8166 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:46 pm
Posted by The Eric
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
20985 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:50 pm to
he did however touch home
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36690 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:50 pm to
No he did not.
Posted by Doodle
Shreveport
Member since Feb 2007
109 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:50 pm to
Run counts
Posted by tiger1014
Member since Jan 2011
12511 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:52 pm to
Just like the Honey Badger not crossing the goal line the SEC championship.

Still counts!

Posted by Bosethus68
We Call It Dat Boot
Member since May 2011
4958 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:52 pm to
Still counts
Posted by Brageous
Member since Jul 2008
107724 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:52 pm to
yeah I'm glad they never noticed on the field
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:53 pm to
Umps are horrible in this game.
Posted by rballa19
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Oct 2009
4379 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Still counts
Posted by Lazy But Talented
Member since Aug 2011
14444 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Umps are horrible in this game.



Odds are he saw it. They didn't appeal, so...
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33877 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Umps are horrible in this game.



Ump could have seen it, but cant do anything unless Stony Brook appeals it...

thank god they didnt
Posted by Veritas vincit
Miles From Nowhere
Member since Jan 2011
606 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Umps are horrible in this game


This wasn't the ump's mistake.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Umps are horrible in this game
its not the umps job to alert stony brook that jones didn't touch. they could have appealed and probably won but they didn't
Posted by wmorris
Eunice Bobcat Country
Member since Feb 2006
1836 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:55 pm to
But the ump signaled safe, can't be safe unless he hits back in theory, correct?
Posted by SeattleTiger19
Member since Oct 2007
4537 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:59 pm to
No but the ump gave the safe signal after the collision.
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61595 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:59 pm to
Count it
Posted by zip25
Member since Sep 2007
289 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 1:01 pm to
About time a call actually went our way.
Posted by redfish99
B.R.
Member since Aug 2007
16440 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 1:05 pm to
Interference would have been the ruling on appeal.
Posted by Tigerdew
The Garden District of Da' Parish
Member since Dec 2003
13594 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

Interference would have been the ruling on appeal.


This
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 1:25 pm to
yes he did.

i will get better hd pics, but he most definitely did. that is why he never had a thought about going back to touch first bc he had all day to.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram