Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Large Rig on Rockefeller Refuge in Grand Chenier

Posted on 1/19/12 at 9:00 pm
Posted by cajunatc
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2003
2463 posts
Posted on 1/19/12 at 9:00 pm
would the state and or national gov get direct royalties if oil or gas was discovered? Would the refuge claim the rights to royalties?

just curious
Posted by polizei11
Houston
Member since May 2009
1135 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 7:08 am to
It's a Chevron rig. Largest land rig in North America.

State government. I am pretty the only wrench thrown into the equation was the permitting required to allow drilling in the refuge.
Posted by WHATDOINO
Member since Dec 2008
6509 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 9:53 am to
Not being petty here but it "was" the largest at one time. Now it's a little down the list. From what I was told.
All said it is still very large for a land drilling platform

As far as state and federal having part, they do have a part in it as far as I know because we were required to go through them for some work we done there

This post was edited on 1/20/12 at 10:02 am
Posted by polizei11
Houston
Member since May 2009
1135 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 11:52 am to
My mistake. Someone in our morning meeting said it was the largest and I took their word for it.

LINK
Posted by WHATDOINO
Member since Dec 2008
6509 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 12:00 pm to
Its one of the largest still, but I'm splitting hairs. Lol.
Posted by WHATDOINO
Member since Dec 2008
6509 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 12:35 pm to
Its one of the largest still, but I'm splitting hairs. Lol.
Posted by Churchill
Member since Apr 2009
496 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 1:17 pm to
I wonder about this as well. The United States has to be the biggest landowner in the country, so the chances are the government has the most natural resources and income from them. Should'nt there be enough income to make the government self sufficient?
Posted by TigerDog83
Member since Oct 2005
8274 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

I wonder about this as well. The United States has to be the biggest landowner in the country, so the chances are the government has the most natural resources and income from them. Should'nt there be enough income to make the government self sufficient?


Standard BLM leases include royalties of 12.5%. While the federal government is making royalties on all offshore production outside of state waters (US Federal Waters) this is far from enough money to fuel the spending of the US Federal government. Most of the BLM lands are in the western US and many areas of heavy government ownership are fairly limited in oil and gas (Nevada, parts of Utah, Arizona, etc).

According to this 2011 totaled about 11 Billion in government royalty income.

2011 Royalty
Posted by cajunatc
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2003
2463 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 8:05 pm to
would they invest that kind of rig if they were not sure there was oil/gas down there?
Posted by tigeryat
God's Country
Member since Oct 2005
2911 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 8:31 pm to
need pics guys
Posted by jonboy
Member since Sep 2003
7138 posts
Posted on 1/20/12 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

would they invest that kind of rig if they were not sure there was oil/gas down there?


Chevron believes they will find the mother-load down there and they needed a rig capable of drilling 30,000 ft plus. So yes, they would pay a higher rig rate if they had to.
Posted by jaf 65
Houma, La
Member since Jan 2007
1870 posts
Posted on 1/21/12 at 2:22 pm to
There is a very DEEP trend that is starting to be recognized running across the central gulf coast so Chevron is going to see if they can get to it. Est @ 30,000ft I believe.

Course that is the "Talk".

Pass that rig every week when I go offshore.
Posted by cajunatc
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2003
2463 posts
Posted on 1/21/12 at 2:53 pm to
Oil or Natural gas?
Posted by Bayou Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
3657 posts
Posted on 1/21/12 at 3:01 pm to
Definitely gas at that depth. If they're lucky it also has a lot of "condensate". This is a light oil that condenses out of the gas as pressure and temperature drop while it flows to the surface.
Posted by gonads&strife
Member since Dec 2011
1885 posts
Posted on 1/21/12 at 4:30 pm to
If I were to guess - it's deep Wilcox.

The royalties go to the landowner(s) in the unitized sand. Rockefeller is either state or fed owned (the land), I'm not sure. The navigable waterways are state owned and the gulf is state out to 3 miles. If the well is drilling near the border of the refuge there could be some pvt mineral owners included in the unit.

ETA: Just looked up the rig on Rigdata - they're drilling on the NW border of the refuge.

ETA2: Found this tidbit online - I was right, deep Wilcox:

quote:

MMR 2012 "Mind-Blowing" Plans

I've been pondering what Jim Flores may have been alluding to when he stated on PXP's Q3 conference call that MMR had "mind-blowing" plans for 2012. It should be noted that this statement was made before the latest electric logs were obtained from the Lafitte well in the Cris R sand and logs and core data from the BBE well in the Sparta zone. Thus, I surmise that the 2012 plans in question probably relate mainly to the Davy Jones strategic area. We also now know that Chevron has permitted a 29,000-foot Wilcox/Tuscaloosa test in the Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge area of Cameron Parish. Rumor has it that MMR and EXXI may participate in this exploratory test. A successful test of Davy Jones #1 would obviously be significant in confirming the commercial potential of the ultra-deep GOM play, but I doubt it rises to mind-blowing status since it is the expected outcome (a lot of capital has been spent on that premise). What might qualify as mind-blowing would be a successful test of Davy Jones #1 that quickly leads to MMR bringing in a partner with deep pockets and an operating capability (Chevron?) to not only accelerate Davy Jones development but the drilling of a number of the other exploratory prospects (N. Davy Jones, John Paul Jones, England) that have been mapped in the Davy Jones strategic area and its extension onshore in South Louisiana. Stay tuned.
This post was edited on 1/21/12 at 4:56 pm
Posted by cajunatc
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2003
2463 posts
Posted on 1/21/12 at 6:04 pm to
even though its swamp land, is there frackable rock at that depth? I was curious if this is the same as "sand"

Posted by gonads&strife
Member since Dec 2011
1885 posts
Posted on 1/21/12 at 6:10 pm to
Yes, of course.

Sand = sandstone, not actual loose sand.
This post was edited on 1/21/12 at 6:11 pm
Posted by cajunatc
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2003
2463 posts
Posted on 1/21/12 at 6:11 pm to
Posted by LSUpetro
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2007
532 posts
Posted on 1/24/12 at 3:43 pm to
Parker is building largest in Alaska for BP.
Posted by Le Gros B
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2006
138 posts
Posted on 8/3/13 at 9:54 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/3/13 at 9:55 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram