Started By
Message
locked post

Jarrell Martin scout article

Posted on 12/19/11 at 2:23 pm
Posted by T1gerWonder
Member since May 2011
4450 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 2:23 pm
LINK

Sounds like he will be there for tonight's basketball game
Posted by Coach D
Member since Oct 2010
1734 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 2:28 pm to
Must Chant His Name TONIGHT
Posted by T1gerWonder
Member since May 2011
4450 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 2:34 pm to
Sounds like he likes both of the teams tonight. But in the article it keeps on hinting the home team is the favorite
Posted by Brageous
Member since Jul 2008
107724 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 2:45 pm to
Home team is the favorite if they show they can be a competitive team this year IMO. Same thing with Gathers. If we show we are going in the right direction and possibly make the tourney, we look really good for these guys.
Posted by Bubba Hotep
Member since Nov 2003
9330 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 2:46 pm to
Ricardo Gathers said over the weekend that LSU is recruiting him the hardest. Martin now says that LSU is recruiting him the hardest.

Trent Johnson has caught some criticism for an alleged lack of intensity on the recruiting trail. I really think it has to do with Johnson's staff being tight lipped and not letting a lot of recruiting info slip out, unlike a lot of programs who secretly release info to reporters about who they are recruiting, etc.

I think this leads to a lot of incorrect speculation.
Posted by LSUfan007700
Democratic Party
Member since Sep 2007
2528 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 3:00 pm to
Well, he just needs to worry about winning and recruiting the instate guys. If he can get Gathers and Martin, that's strong
Posted by Bubba Hotep
Member since Nov 2003
9330 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 3:04 pm to
Martin is 2013, so we have some time with him, but yes, you are right.
Posted by macaoidh
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
2922 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Ricardo Gathers said over the weekend that LSU is recruiting him the hardest. Martin now says that LSU is recruiting him the hardest.

Trent Johnson has caught some criticism for an alleged lack of intensity on the recruiting trail. I really think it has to do with Johnson's staff being tight lipped and not letting a lot of recruiting info slip out, unlike a lot of programs who secretly release info to reporters about who they are recruiting, etc.

I think this leads to a lot of incorrect speculation.


Trent actually told Bryan Lazare a while back that he was more comfortable with 10 guys on scholarship than 13 because of the demands of coaching 13.

That's not a joke.

The problem here isn't that Trent is tight-lipped about recruiting. It's that he doesn't recruit aggressively.

Go to LSU's recruiting list on Rivals, and in a year when LSU has five scholarships to fill they've got 15 players rated 3-stars or higher listing LSU as an option - meaning (generally speaking) somebody from Rivals contacted them and they mentioned LSU as being in the picture for them.

Compare that to Baylor, who has 36 players on their list for four spots, and Xavier, who has 39 for four spots, and you'll see that me do a LOT less work on the recruiting trail.

And this lack of activity has residual effects, because the less prospects you actively work the less coaches, teammates, relatives and so forth you make contact with. And as a result the less buzz you have around your program that would prepare the ground for future recruiting battles.

That's why Trent is in his fourth year coaching LSU's program and with five scholarships available he signed all of one player in the early period, with basically nobody out there right now you can confidently state he's in the lead for.

He's simply not doing the work on the recruiting trail. And when you get outworked in recruiting, you usually get beat up on the court. They're playing Marquette tonight, which is a tiny Catholic school in Milwaukee without a whole lot more basketball tradition than LSU (they have their moments just like we do, but since Al McGuire it's not like they're Duke) and a guy as their coach who came from UNO - and watch how much deeper and more talented they are than we tonight.

BTW, Marquette has three scholarships available (maybe four; I think one of the guys on their roster might be a walkon). Their recruiting list on Rivals has 41 3-star players and higher on it. That's what it takes to recruit at a Top 25 level.
Posted by Bubba Hotep
Member since Nov 2003
9330 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 3:52 pm to
So you are using Rivals database as your judgement on the recruiting aggressiveness of a coach? I really have no response to that.
Posted by tigerfan4120
Member since Dec 2003
3262 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 3:54 pm to
basketball recruiting seems to be all about relationships and it may just be a better strategy to focus on fewer guys to build relationships with rather than casting a large net and offering 40 prospects.
Posted by Bubba Hotep
Member since Nov 2003
9330 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 3:59 pm to
Here you have two of the best players in Louisiana saying, with their own mouths, that LSU is recruiting them the most aggressive.

Yet, we should judge LSU's aggressiveness on the recruiting trail as being weak, because some 3-star in Florida who won't even get an LSU offer doesn't tell warchant.com that LSU is on his list?

Sounds logical.
This post was edited on 12/19/11 at 4:00 pm
Posted by Bubba Hotep
Member since Nov 2003
9330 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 4:03 pm to
Oh, and FYI. I agree that 13 players on a basketball roster is too many. Apparently, so does the NCAA who is considering trimming it down to 12. Many schools don't use the full 13, instead awarding scholarships to walk-ons to fill out the roster.

Too many players, equals too many playing time issues, equals too much drama, equals players quitting and transferring.

I expect LSU to sign only 3 players this season, which would put them at 11 -- same as this year, plus two walk-ons.
This post was edited on 12/19/11 at 4:06 pm
Posted by macaoidh
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
2922 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

Here you have two of the best players in Louisiana saying, with their own mouths, that LSU is recruiting them the most aggressive.

Yet, we should judge LSU's aggressiveness on the recruiting trail as being weak, because some 3-star in Florida who won't even get an LSU offer doesn't tell warchant.com that LSU is on his list?

Sounds logical.



It's a general measure of recruiting activity. If you're not even involved enough with major college recruits that they bother to mention you to the recruiting gurus, then clearly you're not hitting the trail very hard.

Compare LSU to other SEC schools, if you'd rather...

ALABAMA: one spot open, 46 players
ARKANSAS: two spots open, 28 players (actually signed three, so somebody on the roster is getting sent packing)
AUBURN: three spots open, 31 players
FLORIDA: three (maybe four) spots open, 52 players
GEORGIA: four spots open, 43 players
KENTUCKY: two (but more like five) spots open, 31 players (signed three)
OLE MISS: two spots open, 25 players
MISSISSIPPI STATE: three (possibly four) spots open, 7 players (but signed five guys in the early period, meaning they'd identified and locked up most of their people before the big recruiting push hit)
SOUTH CAROLINA: one spot open, 25 players
TENNESSEE: two spots open, 41 players
VANDERBILT: six spots open, 25 players

Outside of Mississippi State, who took care of their business in the fall and actually has oversigned, so you can't compare their approach to ours, everybody else in the SEC is casting a much wider net than LSU does.

You can poo-poo the methodology all you want, but it's pretty obvious that LSU's issues on the recruiting trail aren't just that Mike Scarborough didn't get a copy of the recruiting list.
Posted by macaoidh
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
2922 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Oh, and FYI. I agree that 13 players on a basketball roster is too many. Apparently, so does the NCAA who is considering trimming it down to 12. Many schools don't use the full 13, instead awarding scholarships to walk-ons to fill out the roster.

Too many players, equals too many playing time issues, equals too much drama, equals players quitting and transferring.

I expect LSU to sign only 3 players this season, which would put them at 11 -- same as this year, plus two walk-ons.



Oh, OK.

The team LSU plays tonight actually uses 10 players pretty much every game. But you want to carry only 11 on the roster, including people like Ludwig and Courtney?

That ain't smart.

If the NCAA cuts it down to 12 players, which won't be done for team chemistry purposes but for Title IX more than anything else (they're not cutting women's hoops from 15 anytime soon), then fine. But if you don't at least carry the number that everybody else carries you're not doing your job - unless of course you're carrying 10 or 11 guys and three or four of them are NBA prospects like North Carolina has.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
155598 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 4:47 pm to
fun night for lsu basketball
Posted by Bubba Hotep
Member since Nov 2003
9330 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 4:50 pm to
I may not have seen a more flawed statistical argument in my life.

There are major issues with this. The first being the accuracy of the information and any biases that may or may not exist. Then there is the quality of the Rivals reporter that covers recruiting in that state, or covers a particular school. The honesty of recruits, the ACTUAL scholarships available (rather than perceived openings), the rating system and your arbitrary 3-star line (plenty of players are still unranked, especially JUCO players), the differences in info by different recruiting services (Scout only shows Alabama with 16 players meeting your criteria, rather than 46).

Finally, there is the actual results: By your methodology, if you can call it that, Alabama, South Carolina and Tennessee are recruiting more aggressively than Kentucky.

I prefer to rank LSU on the actual results. And based on actual players and performance, I think LSU's class of Hickey, O'Bryant, Isaac and Hamilton, is significantly better than Alabama's class last year that was ranked 12th.


eta: you are basing too much on bad info. I might agree if I knew the info was good, but I look at the Rivals database quite a bit and it is a complete joke. They have a kid from Louisiana that is listed as unsigned, when in fact he moved to Utah over a year ago and signed with Utah State. They have players that are juniors in college that the database still lists as unsigned.


This post was edited on 12/19/11 at 4:57 pm
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 4:55 pm to
Posted by macaoidh
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
2922 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:19 pm to
Well, you're the guy who's attempting to manage the basketball recruiting thread and you can't even say who LSU is going to sign this year.

And you're defending leaving scholarships open. Which is somewhat peculiar; I don't think I've ever seen somebody advocate only having 75 guys on football scholarships or only carrying 28 guys on the baseball roster; not sure why carrying only 11 when 13 is allowed in basketball is somehow a good idea. Particularly when the rest of the SEC usually maxes out their available roster spots.

I suspect you didn't just come along in following LSU basketball when Trent Johnson got the job. I submit that we never lacked for pressure against that 13 scholarships when Brady was here outside of the restrictions from probation - and Brady railed against those restrictions when he had a bunch of kids transfer and got caught with only five scholarship players that one year. After he got over that he never had a problem signing enough kids to get to 13 - his problem was keeping 13 kids on the team past Christmas.

Dale Brown routinely engaged in machinations to get around the 13 scholarships so he could recruit more people.

I don't exactly yearn for the heady days of Brown and Brady. I do, however, find it ridiculous that Johnson is clearly being outworked on the recruiting trail (you can fault those numbers if you want, but do your analysis from Scout's data or ESPN's and you'll get the same results), when this is precisely the biggest gripe the Stanford people had with him before he got here, and somehow this is neither a readily-apparent fact nor a matter of great concern when this is a team clearly deficient in talent and has precisely one new player set to come in at present.

You can ride on Trent's bandwagon if you want. Should be lots of room around 10:30 tonight - particularly when there aren't any recruits taking up space next to you.
Posted by Bubba Hotep
Member since Nov 2003
9330 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:46 pm to
I'm not on his bandwagon and have stated many times he should be fired without a minimum of a winning record this season. He definitely is open to criticism, I just disagree with your particularly method,

As far as my following recruiting, I do it for fun and have never claimed or insinuated that I have any inside sources. I am just a fan, consolidating public info and sharing my opinions.

As far as this year, I think they have put a lot of eggs in Gathers' basket and his indecision has them frozen right now. I think they are scared to take any other commits, especially from similar plays for fear of running him off. One thing they can sell is playing time.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10418 posts
Posted on 12/19/11 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

Well, you're the guy who's attempting to manage the basketball recruiting thread and you can't even say who LSU is going to sign this year.
Trent doesn't even know who we are going to sign this year. How should a random message boarder be expected to know?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram