- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Witness to brawl on WWL this am.....
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:17 am to Geauxld Finger
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:17 am to Geauxld Finger
quote:
Bob Delgiorno is a hack and a shitty radio host
1
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:17 am to CptBengal
quote:
So he had no idea who people were, but DAYS later knows what JJ was doing...
yeah, believable
He didn't recognize any of the "involved" players...meaning JJ wasn't involved. Duh
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:17 am to ApexTiger
quote:
But if you are not from LSU, and it's dark outside...Is it reasonable to believe that JJ wasn't recognized until his face was put all over BR TV?
GTFO trying to post something reasonable on here
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:17 am to Choctaw
quote:
would this be a good place to leave my dancing Carlton gif?
Absolutely
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:17 am to Elleshoe
It's not unreasonable for someone to recognize JJ, but not all the others involved.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:17 am to Dribble
Maybe meant that, as he was witnessing it live, he didnt know or recognize those involved.
Later, he then saw a pic of an accused JJ on the news/online, and thought, "That dude, who I now know is JJ, was not one of the dudes I saw involved in the fight. He was just one of many that I saw who was trying to calm things down", etc.
Makes sense to me.
Later, he then saw a pic of an accused JJ on the news/online, and thought, "That dude, who I now know is JJ, was not one of the dudes I saw involved in the fight. He was just one of many that I saw who was trying to calm things down", etc.
Makes sense to me.
This post was edited on 8/24/11 at 11:19 am
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:17 am to CptBengal
police said no vehicular assault occurred.
I had not seen this.
His statements already dont jive with police facts.
Now the police have conclusive and substantive facts.
He stated he did not recognize these players till he saw there pics later on.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:18 am to Ice Cold
quote:
We don't know what statements they made.
Their attorney said none were in the bar. At least 1 is confirmed to have been in the bar...
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:18 am to ffhouston
quote:
Later, he then saw a pic of an accused JJ on the news/online, and thought, "That dude, who I now know is JJ, was not one of the dudes I saw involved in the fight."
exactly but most of the guys in this thread can't wrap their brains around that apparently.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:19 am to harry coleman beast
quote:
You really want the players to be guilty huh.
No, I find it odd that a student who was there, and COPS ARRIVED ON SCENE not long after the fight. Why didn't he speak to the cops then, why just go home?
I want the truth to come out and the responsible parties (whomever that is) face the proper punishment.
I don't care about a side, I care about the truth. Odd many here don't.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:19 am to Elleshoe
somebody just got his grad school paid for
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:19 am to CptBengal
Haha yup, those darn facts get me everytime.
But on a lighter, less idiotic note to you saying how the grad student said JJ didn't do anything but didn't know what the players looked like.. If you saw a person helping an old woman cross the street, keep in mind you have no idea who the person or old lady is, then 4 days later see this persons picture on the news with their name.. Would you not be like "oh yeah that was the guy who was trying to help out" then again you seem to have the mental capacity of a 3 year old so I can understand how you would be confused
But on a lighter, less idiotic note to you saying how the grad student said JJ didn't do anything but didn't know what the players looked like.. If you saw a person helping an old woman cross the street, keep in mind you have no idea who the person or old lady is, then 4 days later see this persons picture on the news with their name.. Would you not be like "oh yeah that was the guy who was trying to help out" then again you seem to have the mental capacity of a 3 year old so I can understand how you would be confused
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:20 am to Elleshoe
quote:
Their attorney said none were in the bar. At least 1 is confirmed to have been in the bar...
Thats what I saids.
So just because a witness didnt agree with statements ("facts") made by the "victims" means it isnt true?
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:20 am to Maximus
Delgiorno's on the case, so we should have this wrapped up by drive time.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:20 am to CptBengal
quote:
CptBengal
I don't want to be a dick but I think before you keep putting your foot in your mouth you should read the statutes in Rick Rickles therad and learn the definitions of assault and battery. They are not interchangable words.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:20 am to CptBengal
This may surprise you, but not every college kids wants to talk to the cops at 2am.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:20 am to Elleshoe
quote:
"That dude, who I now know is JJ, was not one of the dudes I saw involved in the fight."
exactly but most of the guys in this thread can't wrap their brains around that apparently.
So instead of CALLING THE POLICE, he calls a call in radio show to voice his story.
Really? REALLY?
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:20 am to CptBengal
"So he had no idea who people were, but DAYS later knows what JJ was doing... "
I have no idea what happened, but it is not surprising at all that a witness could only after an incident know the name of someone involved. This happens all the time. the witness sees something go down and remembers what those involved looked like, what they wearing etc. The witness later sees a picture of those involved and says "that's the guy." this is precisley how wanted posters and lineups work.
I have no idea what happened or if the WWL caller was telling the truth, but the mere fact that he was not up to snuff at the time on visually identifying Jordan Jefferson means nothing.
I have no idea what happened, but it is not surprising at all that a witness could only after an incident know the name of someone involved. This happens all the time. the witness sees something go down and remembers what those involved looked like, what they wearing etc. The witness later sees a picture of those involved and says "that's the guy." this is precisley how wanted posters and lineups work.
I have no idea what happened or if the WWL caller was telling the truth, but the mere fact that he was not up to snuff at the time on visually identifying Jordan Jefferson means nothing.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:20 am to Klingler7
quote:
Jimmy Hawthorne should have been at Shady's doing the punch-by-punch accounts.
I think it has already been proven that Jim Hawthorne is not a credible eye witness.
Posted on 8/24/11 at 11:21 am to CptBengal
quote:
I don't care about a side, I care about the truth. Odd many here don't.
Most here would have kept perrilloux on the team if they had an option.
Page 4 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News