Sno's Seafood and Steakhouse

It isn't near as good as Philay's which is right down the road. I have never had bad food at Sno's, but Philay's is much better.

It tries to be the nice place in town, fwiw they do some things real good ( fried seafood, fish almandine, soups) and some of their specials are legit, and a lot of there stuff is just not good(augratin dishes, prime rib, gumbos). So depending on what you get it can be pretty good or just bad

Bout the same both do some things well, both menus are a few decades old, Sno's does try to bring in specials , both pack a crowd and have wait times close to an hour on the weekends so obviously lots of people like it

quote:

---

I think Mike Anderson's in Gonzales is far better than Sno's.

I live out in that area and often forget about Sno's.

---

See and I have been disappointed every time I've been to MA. I always thought Sno's was better. I live here as well.

As Tigerpaw eluded to, it could be the dishes that we order and don't order that really make up the difference between restaurants.

quote:

---

Better or worse than Mike Andersons?

---

I used to stay at that Holiday Inn for work and rotate between MA and Sno's, neither were very good but MA was better.

MA Gonz
Snos

Philays--not impressed

I went to Sno's about two months ago. It was pretty bad and I don't plan on going back.

Both Phillay's and Mike Anderson's are far better options in that area.

Sno's isn't bad, but I am very tired of the fried seafood/steak place concept that dominates our food culture. Sno's is cookie cutter similar to Mike Anderson's and many other places who might seem to be a chain, they are that similar.

That is one of the reasons places like Bay Leaf and a plethora of sushi shacks attract so many young people, it's something different. Going out to eat doesn't have to be a bland chain or like going out for Grandpa's b'day.