Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Taxing Healh Benefits

Posted on 6/28/10 at 12:16 pm
Posted by PlanoPrivateer
Frisco, TX
Member since Jan 2004
2795 posts
Posted on 6/28/10 at 12:16 pm
This was in an email sent by a friend. I hadn't heard about this.


2011 W-2 Tax Forms


Should you want to verify this, go to LINK /, enter "HR 3590" in the search box and look for "CRS Summaries." This is what you'll find.

Title IX Revenue Provisions—Subtitle A: Revenue Offset
"(Sec. 9002) Requires employers to include in the W-2 form of each employee the aggregate cost of applicable employer-sponsored group health coverage that is excludable from the employee's gross income (excluding the value of contributions to flexible spending arrangements)."


Starting in 2011—next year—the W-2 tax form sent by your employer will be increased to show the value of whatever health insurance you are provided. It doesn't matter if you're retired. Your gross income WILL go up by the amount of insurance your employer paid for So you’ll be required to pay taxes on a larger sum of money that you actually received. Take the tax form you just finished for 2009 and see what $7,000.00 or $15,000.00 additional gross income does to your tax debt. My company insurance costs me $900 a year. My company pays $70000 & $8000 a year four my insurance. Assuming just a 10% tax rate it will cost an additional $700 to $800 in new taxes. Do you know what you'll be paying next year. This is not just for the wealthy, this happens to everyone. For many it puts you into a much higher bracket. This is how the government is going to buy insurance for fifteen (15) percent that don't have insurance and it's only part of the tax increases, but it's not really a "tax increase" as such, it a redefinition of your taxable income. Does this sound like the cost of health care went down for most Americans to you? This will be a huge tax hike to the people that make under $250,000. The President said he would not raise taxes on those making less than that and yet he signed it into law.

Also, go to Kiplinger's and read about the thirteen (13) tax changes for 2010 that could affect you.

Why am I sending you this? The same reason I hope you forward this to every single person in your address book. People have the right to know the truth because an election is coming in November. So vote intelligently, based on your values. But also you may want to adjust your tax withholding, or increase your savings, or it might actually even be cheaper for you to buy private insurance if you can so that you aren't surprised and put in a jam when your federal income taxes are due on April 15, 2012.

Posted by Monkey
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
4172 posts
Posted on 6/28/10 at 12:22 pm to
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
22774 posts
Posted on 6/28/10 at 12:26 pm to
June 14, 2010, 9:00 am
Are Employer Contributions Now Taxable Income?
By MICHELLE ANDREWS
Q.Will my employer change my earnings to reflect an increase? The insurance payment he makes — will this now be considered taxable income? — George Shedlock, Anchorage, Alaska


A.Starting in 2011, the new health law requires employers to begin reporting the value of the health benefits they provide to employees on their W-2 forms — the wage and tax statement you receive to use when filing your taxes.

But the amount on the form is for informational purposes only. As is now the case, you’ll owe no tax on your employer’s contributions to your health insurance. “I think the provision is intended to raise awareness about how much employee health benefits cost,” said Timothy Jost, a law professor at Washington and Lee University.

LINK /
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
22774 posts
Posted on 6/28/10 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Looks like to be only partly true


Yea...the part about the amount appearing on your tax documents is true.

Not the tax. Unions successfully lobbied that stipulation out of the bill.
Posted by tigeralum06
Member since Oct 2007
2788 posts
Posted on 6/28/10 at 1:33 pm to
The health benefits will not be taxed yet. The IRS wants to know how much tax revenue they are losing because of it. You can bet they will be taxed in the near future once the politicians have an estimate of the amount of revenue it will generate.
Posted by Boh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2009
12357 posts
Posted on 6/28/10 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

The IRS wants to know how much tax revenue they are losing because of it.

which implies they think it is theirs to begin with
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 6/28/10 at 1:38 pm to
This really seems like a data inquiry from the IRS. When that is supplied via the W-2 then the IRS can pool that data together and provide it to Congress as information they can use to figure out where to tax you in the future.

The email is wrong in what it is doing for next year but if anyone this this is only required as a feel good factor for the employee then they are pretty dumb. Congress just wants to see how much money they are possibly losing out on and at what tax point that can get to that money with the least amount of backlash.
Posted by xenon16
Metry Brah
Member since Sep 2008
3528 posts
Posted on 6/28/10 at 6:55 pm to
The bill includes a provision that begins taxing the "Cadillac" plans in 2018, meaning that the insurance companies will bear the tax for the plans that are top notch if they still exist by then
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram