Should LSU drop one of the in-state schools

sure

La Tech is actually a step up from AM this year

If we set up an annual game, we should balance the regional foe (like A&M) versus a good travel game (not A&M). Maybe an Arizona or a NC or a Boston College would provide a good game and a good travel spot. Washington was very well-received this year, a great away spot.

We should never play another in-state rival unless they can prove that they can consistently have winning seasons at least.

no way the Athletic Department give up a home game annually

the fact that we will play an OOC away game two years in a row is astonishing(WASH 09, UNC 10)

There is no reason for LSU to be playing ULM and McNeese. None

I'd rather not have ULL schedule LSU again until the Tigers have their shite together.

quote:

---

I like playing Tech and wouldn't mind them being a regular in-state rival since Tulane is too lame to continue.

---

This. I would like for LSU and Tech to play every year but they would have to come to some agreement about a home and home like they did with Tulane.

A&M signed a 10 year contract to play Arkansas in the Jerry Dome every year so I wouldn't consider them an option.

I'd like to see LSU play Houston, simply for recruiting purposes.

Even Rice or Baylor has an appeal to me, much more so than ULM, ULL, Tulane or McNeese.

Texas or Texas Tech, but I don't see those as even a possibility.

Is TCU scheduled in the distant future with LSU?