- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Game should have ended in bottom of the 9th
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:16 pm
That 4th ball that turned into a wild pitch or passed ball definately hit the Texas batter - the run should have not been allowed - 1st base was open.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:18 pm to BullSam
NOT THIS AGAIN!!!
DID NOT HIT BATTER!!!
WE WON SO IT DOESN'T MATTER!!!
DID NOT HIT BATTER!!!
WE WON SO IT DOESN'T MATTER!!!
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:18 pm to BullSam
It did NOT definitely hit him. At best, it's something that should have been discussed, and if the home plate umpire didn't hear a sound, it stands.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:30 pm to TigerNAtux
quote:
That 4th ball that turned into a wild pitch or passed ball definately hit the Texas batter - the run should have not been allowed - 1st base was open
No, because the the next batter would have hit a grand slam.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:33 pm to BullSam
It didn't hit the batter, and it wasn't even really close. Mike Patrick was drunk.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:41 pm to Grandmaster Wang
It doesn't matter, but it definitely hit him!! You can see the line it makes as it hits the back of his shirt and then changes direction...mute point though, we won
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:41 pm to Grandmaster Wang
It wasn't close to the batter. If you actually paid attention to the game you could see the gap between the batter and the ball was around 4-5 inches away from the batter. Either way, it was a terrible pitch.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:46 pm to jscrims
quote:
If you actually paid attention to the game you could see the gap between the batter and the ball was around 4-5 inches away from the batter
Looked like it brushed his shirt but didn't actually hit his body to me. 4-5 inches...I think not
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:49 pm to scrimpdog
quote:
It doesn't matter, but it definitely hit him!
quote:
It wasn't close to the batter. If you actually paid attention to the game you could see the gap between the batter and the ball was around 4-5 inches away from the batter. Either way, it was a terrible pitch
Unfortunately I had a football game during the beginning of the baseball game, and this very play was what I was greeted to when I started my car.
Just seems weird that one person says it definitely hit him and one person says it missed him by 4".
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:51 pm to STEVED00
quote:
Unfortunately I had a football game during the beginning of the baseball game, and this very play was what I was greeted to when I started my car.
From the pitchers view it looked like it hit him because the ball changed directions when it hit the mitt
Then from the umps view the ball disappeared from sight and brushed by the batter (appearing to barely make contact with the shirt) and it definitely hit the mitt.
It was a close call that could have gone either way. For anyone to suggest that it was really obvious either way is crazy. No way it missed him by 4 inches.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:52 pm to BullSam
quote:
That 4th ball that turned into a wild pitch or passed ball definately hit the Texas batter
It did NOT hit him.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:54 pm to STEVED00
I thought it hit him but couldnt understand why he wouldnt get help from the field umpire who may have had a better view than him since the pitch was behind the batter.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:54 pm to scrimpdog
quote:
You can see the line it makes as it hits the back of his shirt and then changes direction
It hits Gibbs' catchers mit.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:54 pm to Powerman
It hit the mitt to change direction, not the batter. You could not see that from the front view, had to see the play from behind gibbs to see it hit the glove.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 1:01 pm to LSUTigerz
The front view looked like it hit him and the ball changed direction.
The back view looked like it missed him and only changed direction coming off Gibbs glove.
I'm going with the clearer view (behind the batter).
A bunch of 3rd graders yelling "I'm right, you're wrong!" is beyond rantarded.
The back view looked like it missed him and only changed direction coming off Gibbs glove.
I'm going with the clearer view (behind the batter).
A bunch of 3rd graders yelling "I'm right, you're wrong!" is beyond rantarded.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 1:11 pm to LSUTigerz
i don't think it hit him, but it could have been a blessing for us.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 1:18 pm to Grandmaster Wang
quote:
Mike Patrick was drunk.
Agree
Posted on 6/23/09 at 1:19 pm to TigerBait1127
From the pitcher's point of view, I think you can see his shirt move as the ball hits it.
It certainly wasn't clear and it's definitely not a call you can be upset with. At best, it nipped his shirt.
It certainly wasn't clear and it's definitely not a call you can be upset with. At best, it nipped his shirt.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News