- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
College Stadiums that have corporation names
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:03 am
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:03 am
This was a topic on Jordie's show and I was surprised how many have them. I am sure that there are more.
Papa Johns' Stadium - Louisville
Jones At&T Stadium -Texas Tech
Bright House Networks- Central Florida
The new stadium at Minnesota
BB&T Field at Groves Stadium- Wake Forest
Chevy Chase Bank Field at Bryd Stadium- Maryland
Movie Gallery Stadium- Troy
Papa Johns' Stadium - Louisville
Jones At&T Stadium -Texas Tech
Bright House Networks- Central Florida
The new stadium at Minnesota
BB&T Field at Groves Stadium- Wake Forest
Chevy Chase Bank Field at Bryd Stadium- Maryland
Movie Gallery Stadium- Troy
This post was edited on 5/12/09 at 10:04 am
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:04 am to goinallout
From what I remember, this was attempted at Tiger Stadium, briefly, and they were told, ahem, NO.
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:06 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
Those sponsors tried to advertise. Damn it. TS would suck if it had a corporation name in it.
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:07 am to NationalChampionLSU
quote:
Chevy Chase Bank Field at Bryd Stadium- Maryland
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:08 am to TigerNlc
quote:
The new stadium at Minnesota
This one wins for originality.
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:10 am to goinallout
Don't forget the Carrier Dome for Syracuse, which set the standard for naming rights of college stadiums.
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:10 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
Gay. Stadiums without corporate names are just so much more badass...
Camden Yards, Soldier Field, Rose Bowl...
Camden Yards, Soldier Field, Rose Bowl...
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:11 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
It's worth noting that without exception, none of the teams on that list are consistent winners.
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:17 am to spslayto
ETA: Someone told me wrong...whoops.
This post was edited on 5/12/09 at 10:19 am
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:18 am to Golfer
ETA: Never mind since Golfer edited his post.
This post was edited on 5/12/09 at 10:20 am
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:25 am to Golfer
I don't like it but, if Exxon wanted to step up with a big financial donation, I wouldn't mind. We need to find new ways to generate revenue to remain competitive. That being said, I guess I could live with something like Tiger Stadium by Exxon. Put the Tiger in your tank.
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:33 am to TigerEd
quote:
e need to find new ways to generate revenue to remain competitive.
This is a fallacy.
You can't spend the revenue on players, just staff and facilities. Those can only help you to a point.
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:38 am to CountryVolFan
Corporate-named stadiums are of course complete bullshite: no soul, no character, no identity. The stadiums change names every two or three years, and half the time it's the name of some bankrupt company. McDonald's Tiger Stadium? HELLLLLL NO.
Posted on 5/12/09 at 10:40 am to CountryVolFan
I don't think it is a fallacy at all. It takes alot of money to drive these big trains in Baton Rouge, Knoxville, Athens, etc. The more corporate money there is, the longer ticket prices can be kept reasonable, if you can call $50/seat reasonable.
Posted on 5/12/09 at 11:07 am to goodgrin
You might find this concept interesting... for some stadiums they are simply TOO well-known to be attractive for corporate sponsorship.
One of the reasons the Superdome has had trouble attracting a corporate name is because everyone knows it's the Superdome. They would never call it the ExxonMobil Superdome, for example.
Mile High Stadium ran into this same problem. Invesco had to settle for it being called Invesco Field at Mile High. No one wanted to call the stadium Invesco Stadium.
Certain college venues are low on the list for corporations to target simply because they're too well known... like the Big House or the Horseshoe or the Swamp. I would have to think Death Valley is one of those stadiums, too. Because regardless of what it's formal name is... it's BRANDING name (and branding is what this is all about) is DEATH VALLEY.
The Death Valley brand is too strong to overcome within the college football audience.
So I think Death Valley is pretty safe from this particular fate. Not because I trust LSU to never sell the name... they would sell every inch of that stadium if they could... but because it's not a good deal for advertisers.
One of the reasons the Superdome has had trouble attracting a corporate name is because everyone knows it's the Superdome. They would never call it the ExxonMobil Superdome, for example.
Mile High Stadium ran into this same problem. Invesco had to settle for it being called Invesco Field at Mile High. No one wanted to call the stadium Invesco Stadium.
Certain college venues are low on the list for corporations to target simply because they're too well known... like the Big House or the Horseshoe or the Swamp. I would have to think Death Valley is one of those stadiums, too. Because regardless of what it's formal name is... it's BRANDING name (and branding is what this is all about) is DEATH VALLEY.
The Death Valley brand is too strong to overcome within the college football audience.
So I think Death Valley is pretty safe from this particular fate. Not because I trust LSU to never sell the name... they would sell every inch of that stadium if they could... but because it's not a good deal for advertisers.
Posted on 5/12/09 at 11:10 am to SpqrTiger
That is a great point SpqrTiger.
Posted on 5/12/09 at 11:24 am to SpqrTiger
quote:
You might find this concept interesting... for some stadiums they are simply TOO well-known to be attractive for corporate sponsorship.
Good point, although I don't know if I completely agree with the corporation not wanting to, I tend to believe that the well-known stadium refuses to let it change. But maybe it's true in some cases. I think (I could be wrong) LSU was approached to change the name at some point, and LSU said no.
Oh, and I remember calling the 49ers stadium Candlestick loooooong after it changed its name.
Posted on 5/12/09 at 11:56 am to TigerNlc
I wouldn't want Chevy Chase's name on our port-a-pots much less our beloved stadium.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News