- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Binocular recommendation?
Posted on 6/26/21 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 6/26/21 at 5:32 pm
Stopped at Academy to look at a few and came away thinking these are the ones I want:
Vortex Diamondback 10x28
I liked the smaller size and clarity and I am wanting something on the smaller size that will fit in the hatch of my kayak. Primary use will be in the marsh and bays to scout birds and far shorelines.
Any others I should be looking at in the $100-150 range?
Vortex Diamondback 10x28
I liked the smaller size and clarity and I am wanting something on the smaller size that will fit in the hatch of my kayak. Primary use will be in the marsh and bays to scout birds and far shorelines.
Any others I should be looking at in the $100-150 range?
Posted on 6/26/21 at 6:20 pm to nahtanojc
Vortex makes good binoculars.
10x is plenty of power. A lot of birders like 8x, but I prefer 10x.
28mm is small for the lens size, but if you want a small, light weight lens it can work if you have good light. 42mm is the most popular size, I like 50mm for the extra light transmission - but I use them in low light situations pretty often.
For what you want it's a good pick.
10x is plenty of power. A lot of birders like 8x, but I prefer 10x.
28mm is small for the lens size, but if you want a small, light weight lens it can work if you have good light. 42mm is the most popular size, I like 50mm for the extra light transmission - but I use them in low light situations pretty often.
For what you want it's a good pick.
Posted on 6/26/21 at 6:44 pm to nahtanojc
I have some 10x42 Crossfire HD. They are great. My wife uses them in the back yard bird watching an I use them for hunting. My wife raves about them. They were about $150 at Academy last year.
Posted on 6/26/21 at 7:32 pm to nahtanojc
10x28mm gives you an exit pupil of 2.8 … that’s gonna be hard on the eyes (eye fatigue, possible headaches) and very low light gathering. Try to find a pair of 8x30’s or something in similar range. Exit pupil is important for glass, the larger the better in most cases. Pay attention to the glass coatings also
This post was edited on 6/26/21 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 6/26/21 at 8:00 pm to nahtanojc
Vortex is my go-to brand, but 10x28 is not something I would recommend. 10x is going to be hard when on the water and moving, and 28 objective isn't going to be good in low light situations.
I personally feel the 8x42 is a good balance of size/weight and performance, but even an 8x32 would be preferred over 10x28. And I've just checked the Vortex specs, the 8x32 weighs the same as the 10x28.
I personally feel the 8x42 is a good balance of size/weight and performance, but even an 8x32 would be preferred over 10x28. And I've just checked the Vortex specs, the 8x32 weighs the same as the 10x28.
Posted on 6/26/21 at 9:06 pm to nahtanojc
I have 3 pair of good binoculars, and about 10 pair of low-end glasses. Every time I use the cheap glass I regret buying them even though they were cheap. Every time I use the pricey glass, I congratulate myself for a wise purchase.
Just something to consider...
Just something to consider...
Posted on 6/26/21 at 9:11 pm to Tigerinthewoods
quote:
. Every time I use the pricey glass, I congratulate myself for a wise purchase
Posted on 6/26/21 at 9:47 pm to Tigerinthewoods
What price point do you consider the sweet point between quality/price?
Posted on 6/26/21 at 11:40 pm to nahtanojc
quote:
What price point do you consider the sweet point between quality/price?
I have a pair of Nikon Monarch 5 (10x42). Really good glass and can be found for less than $300.
Posted on 6/27/21 at 1:28 am to mingoswamp
I'm thinking more like $500, but keep your eyes open and you can make $500 look a lot more like $300.
Posted on 6/27/21 at 7:27 am to Tigerinthewoods
quote:
I'm thinking more like $500
No doubt it can get better. But after my cousin compared my Nikons to his $500 Leupold binocs, he ordered the Nikons. There was that much difference.
Posted on 6/27/21 at 9:53 am to nahtanojc
Sig Sauer have some pretty good budget optics. I hunt with Zulu 3 8x32 binos and really like how compact and light they are. I also have the Whiskey 3 3-9x40 on my 30-06 and have no complaints with either.
Posted on 6/27/21 at 10:02 am to nahtanojc
I bought my wife a pair of 8 x 30 Swarvoski's back in the mid 90's for her birthday. She worked for the forest service and did a lot of bird watching. They cost somewhere in the 500 dollar area. Waterproof, shockproof and a lifetime warranty. One of the lens caps broke off and the focus wheel broke. Sent it back to Swarovski and they cleaned it top to bottom. Fixed what needed to be fixed and sent them back to me just like brand new. No cost other than sending the nocks back to them.
Posted on 6/27/21 at 11:17 am to nahtanojc
I have 10x42 vortex Diamondback hd and 12x50 vortex Diamondback. Both are great. Got good deals on them. I’d look at some mavens as well. A little step up in price from the vortex.
Posted on 6/27/21 at 9:42 pm to Success
Vortex is pretty clear glass. Only knock i have against em is theyre made in wuhan
Posted on 6/28/21 at 1:50 am to LChama
quote:
Only knock i have against em is theyre made in wuhan
Here’s a list where Vortex scopes are made; from cheapest to more advanced, extreme high end. I don’t own any Vortex optics since I grew up shooting Leupold glass.
Made in China:
Copperhead series
Vortex Crossfire and Crossfire II scopes
Vortex Strike Eagle scopes
Vortex Diamondback scopes
Made in Philippines:
Vortex Viper scopes (HS, HST, PST)
Made in Japan:
Vortex Golden Eagle HD scope
Vortex Razor HD series
Made in U.S.:
Vortex Razor HD AMG ($2500 scope mainly used in PRS competition)
Posted on 6/28/21 at 5:57 am to nahtanojc
quote:
What price point do you consider the sweet point between quality/price?
I think some Mavin c1 10 or 8 x42s would make you happy for a long time. They can easily be found for $300. Everybody wants 10s or 12s but I’d challenge you to try and hand hold either for more than 10-15 seconds to make sure you can. I have a nice pair of meostar 10s and I’m about to get some 8s for the deer woods. For a quick look on a moving deer, or to scan without a tripod, I want 8s.
Edit: I’ve never looked through them, but if you have a military discount the leupold pro guide HDs are also really well reviewed in that $300ish range.
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 6:00 am
Posted on 6/28/21 at 8:55 pm to bigbuckdj
So I ended up going down the rabbit hole looking into optics... and decided to spend a little more coin in the process.
As some mentioned, a 7x or 8x would be preferable out on the water, so I began looking at a few of those. Nikons, Vortex, Leupold, Steiner.
But then I began looking into the image stabilized category, and that's where I went wrong.
My main use would be on the water, whether in my kayak or boats,so IS began to appeal to me more and more even though it was going to blow my budget. Buy once; cry once, right?
The Fujinon TS1440 (and newer TSX1440) seem to be the go-to IS binocular amongst boaters, but I still couldn't justify spending $1400 on a pair of binoculars. Canon's IS offerings have less than 1 degree of stabilization and most aren't even water resistant. (The new Fuji has 6 degrees) But I found a few others from Opticron and Sig Sauer that split the difference with 3 degrees and an IPX4 rating.
So, long story longer... I went to Bowie's today and they suprisingly had the SIG Zulu6 in house, so I was able to play with it a bit and came away impressed. The optics are 16x42, so a higher mag (and smaller exit pupil) than I was originally looking at with the Zulu6 10x30,but considering most of what I will be using them for will be during daylight hours, I wasn't too worried about the dusk/dawn vision. The IS worked great in the parking lot and again at home; I look forward to trying it out inshore and on a couple of offshore trips I have planned next month.
Will report back in a month or so after I put it through it's paces. Definitely the smoothest and clearest binoculars I have looked into.
As some mentioned, a 7x or 8x would be preferable out on the water, so I began looking at a few of those. Nikons, Vortex, Leupold, Steiner.
But then I began looking into the image stabilized category, and that's where I went wrong.
My main use would be on the water, whether in my kayak or boats,so IS began to appeal to me more and more even though it was going to blow my budget. Buy once; cry once, right?
The Fujinon TS1440 (and newer TSX1440) seem to be the go-to IS binocular amongst boaters, but I still couldn't justify spending $1400 on a pair of binoculars. Canon's IS offerings have less than 1 degree of stabilization and most aren't even water resistant. (The new Fuji has 6 degrees) But I found a few others from Opticron and Sig Sauer that split the difference with 3 degrees and an IPX4 rating.
So, long story longer... I went to Bowie's today and they suprisingly had the SIG Zulu6 in house, so I was able to play with it a bit and came away impressed. The optics are 16x42, so a higher mag (and smaller exit pupil) than I was originally looking at with the Zulu6 10x30,but considering most of what I will be using them for will be during daylight hours, I wasn't too worried about the dusk/dawn vision. The IS worked great in the parking lot and again at home; I look forward to trying it out inshore and on a couple of offshore trips I have planned next month.
Will report back in a month or so after I put it through it's paces. Definitely the smoothest and clearest binoculars I have looked into.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News