- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What's the difference between gay and siblings/1st cousin marriage rights?
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:14 pm
Should not two consenting adults be allowed to marry? Mississippi may get revenge on them damn Yankees forcing same sex unions. How do think New York's gonna like having to honor our backwards arse marriages?
This post was edited on 7/11/15 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:16 pm to rebeloke
Try not to be such a dipshit.
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:17 pm to rebeloke
This country will say they are protecting potential children. But considering the abortion laws, it seems rather hypocritical to use that excuse.
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:18 pm to rebeloke
First cousins/siblings having children presents a high likelihood for health problems. Gay couples don't have this problem.
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:18 pm to Solo
What legal arguments that have been used in SOCTUS could not be used for siblings or 1st cousins?
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:18 pm to rebeloke
Because siblings marrying and having sex would produce mental defectives like yourself. You are the argument against sibling marriages, congrats
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:20 pm to REG861
So I guess sisters can get married then?
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:22 pm to rebeloke
I wouldn't care if sisters or brother got married.
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:26 pm to rebeloke
Sisters tying the knot? Let's do it baw!
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:28 pm to rebeloke
Your cuz is looking pretty good, huh reb?
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:31 pm to rebeloke
I get where you are going with this. I don't agree with the recent legalization by SCOTUS or incestuous marriage (sorry Alabama). That being said if they are concerned about birth defects why are women over 40 allowed to have children? It has been proven the chance for birth defects rises dramatically at that age. Maybe they should outlaw having children to that segment of the population if that is the basis for their argument. I don't see how any other argument holds water to keep two people who are related from marrying.
And if that is their argument then this.....
Shouldn't be an issue.
And if that is their argument then this.....
quote:
sisters can get married then?
Shouldn't be an issue.
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:33 pm to Solo
quote:
ry not to be such a dipshit.
concur...
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:41 pm to rebeloke
DNA replication. Do you even science bro?
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:43 pm to Peazey
quote:
First cousins/siblings having children presents a high likelihood for health problems. Gay couples don't have this problem.
What about..... you know..... AIDS
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:48 pm to shiftworker
You don't get married to have sex, so what's the point any way. It's all about people having the tax and insurance benefits then let everybody marry.
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:48 pm to REG861
quote:
Because siblings marrying and having sex would produce mental defectives like yourself
And nobody has sex outside of marriage?
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:54 pm to rebeloke
You're so edgy man. What original thoughts! Provoking and imaginative!
Posted on 7/11/15 at 5:55 pm to rebeloke
As long as they can say "love wins" these hippies will go for it.
Posted on 7/11/15 at 7:33 pm to Peazey
quote:I've only known one married couple who was first cousins. Ironically, he has no health problems, but he is gay. It's the absolute truth.
First cousins/siblings having children presents a high likelihood for health problems. Gay couples don't have this problem.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News