Victims and Families of victims of violence Tuesday evening should sue N.O.

SLM

People keep saying this, but it's not like the cops would have stopped anything.. do they stop murders and shootings when they're on patrol?




The murder rate says NO

If there was no rise in crime then you're wrong. Also if all these were off duty, you're wrong.

I don't give a shite about these monuments, but the hot air being blown from both sides is pretty annoying. Give it a rest

NO talent isn't like a movie and they're sitting listening to scanners and watching cops before they do crime. It's heat of the moment, angry over a drug spot, anger over a woman, disrespect, or just for the frick of fricking shite up!

Even worse than that, the victims families prob expect and have an idea that their member is riding on thin ice with the maker.

That would actually be a pretty interesting discussion...

Either:
1. Mayor has to admit they were "off duty" which means they were being paid OT, yet another direct contradiction of The Bitch's statement of "no public funds being used".
2. The court has to admit that a police presence does nothing to curtail crime, and sets a precedent for personal firearm protection. A common statement used by the left in 2nd amendment discussions is that a high police presence has a considerable impact on crime and that the need for firearms for personal protection is overrated.