Started By
Message

The Time has Come to Consider Nukes on these Monster Storms.

Posted on 9/1/17 at 8:47 pm
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48349 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 8:47 pm
These monster hurricanes give me the creeps. It is high time that we consider using nukes on these things.

Yea or Nay.
Posted by Telstra
Member since Feb 2017
42 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 8:48 pm to
Nay. It wouldn't do anything. The hurricane center has a writeup about it. LINK

quote:

During each hurricane season, there always appear suggestions that one should simply use nuclear weapons to try and destroy the storms. Apart from the fact that this might not even alter the storm, this approach neglects the problem that the released radioactive fallout would fairly quickly move with the tradewinds to affect land areas and cause devastating environmental problems. Needless to say, this is not a good idea. Now for a more rigorous scientific explanation of why this would not be an effective hurricane modification technique.

The main difficulty with using explosives to modify hurricanes is the amount of energy required. A fully developed hurricane can release heat energy at a rate of 5 to 20x1013 watts and converts less than 10% of the heat into the mechanical energy of the wind. The heat release is equivalent to a 10-megaton nuclear bomb exploding every 20 minutes. According to the 1993 World Almanac, the entire human race used energy at a rate of 1013 watts in 1990, a rate less than 20% of the power of a hurricane. If we think about mechanical energy, the energy at humanity's disposal is closer to the storm's, but the task of focusing even half of the energy on a spot in the middle of a remote ocean would still be formidable.

Brute force interference with hurricanes doesn't seem promising. In addition, an explosive, even a nuclear explosive, produces a shock wave, or pulse of high pressure, that propagates away from the site of the explosion somewhat faster than the speed of sound. Such an event doesn't raise the barometric pressure after the shock has passed because barometric pressure in the atmosphere reflects the weight of the air above the ground. For normal atmospheric pressure, there are about ten metric tons (1000 kilograms per ton) of air bearing down on each square meter of surface. In the strongest hurricanes there are nine. To change a Category 5 hurricane into a Category 2 hurricane you would have to add about a half ton of air for each square meter inside the eye, or a total of a bit more than half a billion (500,000,000) tons for a 20 km radius eye. It's difficult to envision a practical way of moving that much air around.

Attacking weak tropical waves or depressions before they have a chance to grow into hurricanes isn't promising either. About 80 of these disturbances form every year in the Atlantic basin, but only about 5 become hurricanes in a typical year. There is no way to tell in advance which ones will develop. If the energy released in a tropical disturbance were only 10% of that released in a hurricane, it's still a lot of power, so that the hurricane police would need to dim the whole world's lights many times a year.
This post was edited on 9/1/17 at 8:52 pm
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35619 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 8:49 pm to
I'm sure seeding the outflow with fallout would be worth it not doing anything to the hurricane.
Posted by Anonymous95
Member since Sep 2014
2076 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 8:49 pm to
Yep. Nothing says brilliant move more than detonating a nuclear weapon into the middle of funnels moving towards population centers
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124171 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 8:50 pm to
That's what we need, nuclear hurricanes.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
62776 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 8:54 pm to
I'm not sure I have heard of a more stupid idea in quite some time.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120262 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 8:54 pm to
Modern nuclear weapons are more efficient and fallout is less of a problem

I see no reason why we shouldnt try it on on irma while shes way out at sea, would provide a lot of info

Dont think it would work, would just be cool AF to nuke a hurricane
This post was edited on 9/1/17 at 8:55 pm
Posted by loustuni
Member since Jul 2008
4160 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 8:56 pm to
Somebody has been watching sharknado
Posted by Boh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2009
12357 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 8:58 pm to
I always wonder is there a way we can just freeze all the water and clouds? Call Mr. Freeze.

Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120262 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 9:01 pm to
Just the photoop of a mushroom cloud in the eye of a hurricane is worth the attempt
Posted by OWLFAN86
The OT has made me richer
Member since Jun 2004
175875 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure I have heard of a more stupid idea in quite some time.


where is chris?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84871 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

That's what we need, nuclear hurricanes.






I'm sure a disaster B-movie has already been made about these.
Posted by King
Deep in the backwoods
Member since Sep 2008
18426 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 9:07 pm to
Let me drink a 12 pack and eat a Chinese buffet.

All I gotta do is point my bare arse in the canes direction.

I got this.
Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
7949 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 9:09 pm to
I don't think a nuclear bomb is a good idea. But cool air destroys these storms, right?

What about lots of bombs that release liquid nitrogen all over the storm?

Just a question, I have no idea if it would work
Posted by King
Deep in the backwoods
Member since Sep 2008
18426 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 9:13 pm to
quote:


What about lots of bombs that release liquid nitrogen all over the storm?


Hot air vs cold air over the ocean. I'm thinking that's how Sharknado got started.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 9:17 pm to
It would probably take more energy than we have ever used to create enough liquid N to even make a dent.
Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
7949 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 9:19 pm to
I don't watch TV outside of sports or news, and I can't sit through a movie so I'll take your word for it
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48349 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 9:25 pm to
I have noticed quite a few downvotes in this thread AND I ALSO NOTICE THAT NONE OF YOU CLOWNS HAVE suggested a better idea than mine.

What about one of them there Neutron Bombs?

at least I'm trying to think of an idea, DillWeeds
This post was edited on 9/1/17 at 9:29 pm
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35619 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

It would probably take more energy than we have ever used to create enough liquid N to even make a dent.


shite, it'd be easier to cut off giant hunks of glacier and drag them in front of the path to cool the ocean.
Posted by Crawdaddy
Slidell. The jewel of Louisiana
Member since Sep 2006
18379 posts
Posted on 9/1/17 at 10:05 pm to
Every rig to install a large pipe pumping cold deep water to the surface. Yeh. That will cool the gulf


Nope. We just fricked. Mother Nature scary
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram