Started By
Message

The IRS has 85k employees.....

Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:43 am
Posted by shiftworker
LP
Member since Dec 2011
5099 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:43 am
The FBI has 35k.


Thanks Obama.





But seriously wtf?
Posted by RebelOP
Misty Mountain Top
Member since Jun 2013
12478 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:43 am to
Each probably making $85k
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:45 am to
Hopefully there are many times more taxpayers than criminals. If so, then you should expect the IRS to have more employees than the FBI. Try applying some common sense before making such silly observations.
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4776 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Try applying some common sense before making such silly observation


Here? Good luck.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39165 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:50 am to
The government's gonna get their money
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23485 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:51 am to
quote:

making $85k

OT poor
Posted by shiftworker
LP
Member since Dec 2011
5099 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:54 am to
I'm just so glad that the government puts more emphasis on the collection of taxes. God knows tax collection>public safety.
Posted by Tigerfan56
Member since May 2010
10520 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:55 am to
The biggest wtf is that the IRS needs more.

As someone else stated, there are man more tax payers than criminals.

The IRS is severely understaffed right now, which allows people to get away with more on their taxes. If the IRS was able to just catch 1% in fines and penalties, it would equate to billions of dollars of additional revenue.
Posted by Tigerfan56
Member since May 2010
10520 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:55 am to
quote:

God knows tax collection>public safety.


lol. How would the government keep you safe without tax collection?
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26446 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:57 am to
The Dems have their priorities....
Posted by shiftworker
LP
Member since Dec 2011
5099 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:57 am to
quote:

The biggest wtf is that the IRS needs more. As someone else stated, there are man more tax payers than criminals. The IRS is severely understaffed right now, which allows people to get away with more on their taxes. If the IRS was able to just catch 1% in fines and penalties, it would equate to billions of dollars of additional revenue.


Or could we possibly simplify the tax code and save money on less IRS employees? Maybe logic doesn't apply to government though?
Posted by rantfan
new iberia la
Member since Nov 2012
14110 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 10:59 am to
My observation on this is taxes need to increase to pay the IRS employees. That's a WTF!
Posted by shiftworker
LP
Member since Dec 2011
5099 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 11:02 am to
quote:

lol. How would the government keep you safe without tax collection?



I'm not advocating zero taxes. I'm not that guy. Just make it more efficient.

I hate paying taxes, but I understand it's necessary.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20870 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Hopefully there are many times more taxpayers than criminals. If so, then you should expect the IRS to have more employees than the FBI. Try applying some common sense before making such silly observations.



Well there are 92 million Americans in the workforce, and 65 million Americans with criminal records...

And of those 92 million less than half pay any income tax...


One could argue there are more criminals than taxpayers

Yet there are more tax collectors than law enforcement. Makes sense.
This post was edited on 11/18/15 at 11:25 am
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 11:06 am to
There would still be hundreds of millions of tax returns filed every year in addition to the billions of information returns. Someone has to administer the tax system. Thinking the IRS can get by with fewer employees is wishful thinking. The type of work they are required to do may change, and that could result in some compensation savings, but the volume will not decrease substantially.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20870 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 11:10 am to
quote:

There would still be hundreds of millions of tax returns filed every year in addition to the billions of information returns. Someone has to administer the tax system. Thinking the IRS can get by with fewer employees is wishful thinking. The type of work they are required to do may change, and that could result in some compensation savings, but the volume will not decrease substantially.



There should be no need to file a tax return. Flat tax everything and have it withdrawn pre-check. That would easily cut the IRS in half.
Posted by shiftworker
LP
Member since Dec 2011
5099 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 11:13 am to
I agree with you that the number of returns would not decrease, but with a simplification of the code surely a simplification of their job would be achieved also. Simplify their job and you should be able to shorten the amount of time spent on each return. Wouldn't this equate to less total time spent doing their jobs? Which in turn would lead to less workers needed?


Run the government like you would a business.
Posted by The Cool No 9
70816
Member since Jan 2014
9947 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 11:14 am to
Sounds like our out of control, expensive, mismanaged, ineffective, inefficient government!
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 11:15 am to
Definitely a shitty situation.

Our tax system certainly should be reconstructed but those who proclaim that a "flat tax" would solve our problem largely don't know their asses from holes in the ground. A "flat tax" does very little to reduce income tax complexity because it's the measurement of income before application of a tax rate that's complex. We need a national sales tax (e.g. the Fair Tax Plan) rather than a flat tax.

eta: Mike Huckabee, for all his faults, understands the difference. Ben Carson doesn't.
This post was edited on 11/18/15 at 11:18 am
Posted by shiftworker
LP
Member since Dec 2011
5099 posts
Posted on 11/18/15 at 11:17 am to
quote:

There should be no need to file a tax return. Flat tax everything and have it withdrawn pre-check. That would easily cut the IRS in half


I have heard of this (and other things like) and approve of the theory. I don't know enough to make a determination about the possibility of its real life implementation though.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram