Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Spinoff question from the Rant, re Academics vs Athletics

Posted on 12/17/15 at 4:17 am
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98200 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 4:17 am
How many here would be happier if your school of choice spun off its athletic program into a separate entity. That way you would be able to root for your state's designated semipro sports franchise without having to think about that annoying college always begging for money.

Because that's what I infer from a lot of posters around here. A lot of you don't seem to give a flying frick about LSU as a university. Who needs book learnin'?
Posted by volod
Leesville, LA
Member since Jun 2014
5392 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 4:31 am to

Well I dont go to LSU. However, from my experiences at both Tech and SUBR , I can see that this "sports only" mentality is quite common.

I know that athletics brings in a huge amount of money, but I do feel that people tend to forget the goal of university.

I figured it comes from escapism, people trying to push off the fact they are in an unmarketable subject or other life problem. And of course there are always those who just LOVE recreation as a past time. Some people simply want to bond with their friends/family etc.

As far as a separation of departments, I think that sports (especially LSU) should have its own designated department and operate independent of LSU while still attribute donations to LSU (similar to SUBR and the Law School).

Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:11 am to
If I gave a shite about academics, I'd support Harvard or Yale. I went to LSU for football, baseball, the party and the girls. If I really wanted an education I'd have chosen a school out of state or I'd have gone to Tulane.

Now shut up and go win another championship in something.
Posted by Grooler
USA
Member since Dec 2009
484 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:12 am to
Alot of people care about LSU. The problem is that the academic side is horribly mismanaged. As long as tenured professors make cushy 6-figure salaries just to teach two courses each year, I won't support more tax dollars going towards academics. I like that athletics are tied to the university, but I can be critical of the academic side seperately from the athletic side.
Posted by 75503Tiger
Member since Sep 2015
4192 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 6:15 am to
quote:

Grooler



Don't get into all those weeds because the question is simple, are the athletes also at LSU for an education? I'd say 10-20% on the big three men's teams. The less glamorous sports are higher.

It's a good question because the universities are running a sports league and that wasn't the original intent. The schools that can afford to survive don't deal with bringing the dead weight of 250 non students onto the campus
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 6:47 am to
quote:

As long as tenured professors make cushy 6-figure salaries just to teach two courses each year, I won't support more tax dollars going towards academics. I like that athletics are tied to the university, but I can be critical of the academic side seperately from the athletic side.


Yeah. Research, advising, and curriculum planning is not something these professors do...
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29176 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 6:51 am to
Yes, in fact it was one of my very first posts I made here:

LINK
Posted by Grooler
USA
Member since Dec 2009
484 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 7:34 am to
Sure, a handful of hardworking professors produce research. Advising is not work. And after planning a curriculum one time, it might never be updated again for the rest of the instructor's career. If a professor does all 3, I have no problem paying them. But that type of professor is more the exception.
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 7:39 am to
Yes. A lot of these athletic programs are fiscally separate and it is pointed out that athletics gives back to the university.

HOWEVER, the university and stare still ultimately owns the rights to their own brand and in most cases they could get MORE amines back by selling their football programs outright to the highest bidder.

It is for this reason that you could say that academics still subsidizes football even when some money is flowing back.
Posted by The Easter Bunny
Minnesota
Member since Jan 2005
45569 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Sure, a handful of hardworking professors produce research. Advising is not work. And after planning a curriculum one time, it might never be updated again for the rest of the instructor's career. If a professor does all 3, I have no problem paying them. But that type of professor is more the exception.


You weren't a science or engineering major, were you?
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
31913 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 8:08 am to
The reality is that the most bloated salaries in a flagship university belong to the athletic department. If anyone is going to accuse a university of financial mismanagement, it really begins with the athletic department, where the majority of schools find creative ways to bleed money despite huge windfalls in cash through tv deals. Auburn, for example, is operating at a 16 million dollar deficit.

LSU to its credit is one of the few schools making money off it's athletics.

At some point, there will be a free market argument, but that of course is ridiculous because the only thing that's about as free market as big time college athletics is the Pyongyang economy.

Jim, to go back to your question. A lot of people either didn't go to LSU or just went there to party. Until very recently, half of LSU students didn't graduate, so they aren't going to be loyal to the academic side of the institution.
Posted by SpqrTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
9267 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 8:26 am to
It will sound contradictory, but while I love college sports, I don't really believe universities should be in the business of sports.

Now, this is a perfect-world, will-never-happen scenario. You know it, and I know it. But to me, universities should focus on teaching and learning.

Sports is a whole other animal, and I think the professional sports leagues should be in the business of developing its own talent. If you want to play, you can sign up for the system at an early age and focus your energy on becoming the best athlete you can be. No need to do a sideshow to keep up appearances regarding academics. And you get paid while you are part of the system.

Academics doesn't need to be slowing down sports, and sports doesn't need to be taxing universities.

But the system we have is what we have. I just wish it was different, that's all.
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
31913 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 8:28 am to
I generally agree with what you're saying, and I'm a bigger college sports fan than a pro sports fan, as well.

Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53020 posts
Posted on 12/17/15 at 8:34 am to
Lsu is the southern law school of Texas
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram