- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scientist says he found definitive proof that God exists
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:28 am to DanMullins4Life
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:28 am to DanMullins4Life
quote:World renowned, globally significant, universally respected, leading theoretical physicist becomes "physicist" when you don't like a finding.
The only insecurity here is the "physicist" who is trying to stir controversy in the scientific community with this article.
1
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:28 am to Displaced
quote:
I don't get how one can use theoretical concepts to reach "definitive" conclusions.
what is funnier that a lot of the posters in this thread celebrating this conclusion from this very scientist would absolutely write him off if I started another thread where he states that global warming is settle science
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:29 am to Roaad
quote:
universally respected
Don't speak for the god he just discovered.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:30 am to Team Vote
That picture is how I view internet atheists. Pimply, chubby, nerd in a fedora.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:30 am to Displaced
quote:
I don't get how one can use theoretical concepts to reach "definitive" conclusions.
You can't. It's a manipulative, misleading title. It's just click bait as it is presented.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:31 am to REG861
quote:
But are you saying there's no chance the this Universal Intelligence" (i.e. God) is a "middle eastern monotheistic deity"? Or do you simply not know?
quote:
Do you know that there is a chance?
The question of who God is, is a matter of faith. If you're looking for definitive scientific proof of God's identity, you'll never find it. You either choose to believe or you don't.
quote:
The idea here at the core of this theory doesn't come close to vindicating the man made notions of salvation and the afterlife that are at the core of every organized religion. I can buy this guy's theory, but that doesnt make me any closer to subscribing to any religion.
And that's fair. I admit that belief in any religion requires faith. By that I mean it requires one to believe something that cannot be proven. Each person has to come to their own conclusion. And none of us will have the real "proof" if we're right or wrong until we die.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:33 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
That's perfectly reasonable I suppose. But are you saying there's no chance the this Universal Intelligence" (i.e. God) is a "middle eastern monotheistic deity"? Or do you simply not know?
I don't know, but it seems unlikely to the point of irrelevance IYAM. The way the world works don't seem to fit the narrative of any of those religions, without a lot of shoehorning. That so many people still live their lives according to them is a testament to the flexibility of the human mind. Or its gullibility, take your pick.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:33 am to Peazey
quote:science is and will always be about "best explanations", not definitive proof.
You can't. It's a manipulative, misleading title. It's just click bait as it is presented
According to good, real science, there are mathematical probabilities that you could spontaneously phase through the Earth as an 8-foot tall Persian woman.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:33 am to Roaad
quote:
That picture is how I view internet atheists. Pimply, chubby, nerd in a fedora.
Team vote is winning this thread without saying a word
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:33 am to Roaad
quote:
That picture is how I view internet atheists. Pimply, chubby, nerd in a fedora
making fun of intellectually superior internet athiests is one of my favorite things to do.
This post was edited on 6/8/16 at 10:34 am
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:35 am to Team Vote
I don't know, dude looks pretty happy. Maybe there's something to this while atheism thing.....
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:36 am to terd ferguson
quote:
Looks familiar... was he on How the Universe Works?
Ancient Aliens...
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:38 am to DanMullins4Life
quote:
Stephen Hawking's
Questioned God. Became a potato.
Proof that the God of the Old Testament exists.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:38 am to terd ferguson
Yeah, he's on just about every science channel show about the universe. I'be seen him most on through that one and through Morgan Freeman's wormhole
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:40 am to Blitzed
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:40 am to Darth_Vader
But Roger said God does not exist and Roger knows more than Michio Kaku.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:41 am to Darth_Vader
I've proven some of my theories. He can't prove this one.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:41 am to Team Vote
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:41 am to musick
quote:
So Elon Musk was right
Knew I couldn't be the only one thinking this...hell it was just discussed last week
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:42 am to Roaad
That isn't the point. The point is that this specific article has a title attached to it which doesn't follow the content of what was actually said in the article. It is click bait. It is obvious. You have to be purposely disingenuous to not see this. It's just a purposely controversial statement to generate buzz. It works.
Saying that you observe a certain order to the universe therefore it makes sense that it had to be intelligently created is not groundbreaking "science." Discussion of the incredibly theoretical fields of string theory and quantum mechanics is not comparable to the much more established fields such as you implied.
Saying that you observe a certain order to the universe therefore it makes sense that it had to be intelligently created is not groundbreaking "science." Discussion of the incredibly theoretical fields of string theory and quantum mechanics is not comparable to the much more established fields such as you implied.
This post was edited on 6/8/16 at 10:43 am
Page 7 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News