- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/18/15 at 2:32 pm to Wtodd
Zero wives is not enough and one is too many.
This post was edited on 2/18/15 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 2/18/15 at 2:39 pm to Wtodd
quote:
he can put up with multiple women nagging at the same time
Seems like punishment enough
Posted on 2/18/15 at 2:41 pm to Howyouluhdat
who
is
that
in
your
profile pic?
is
that
in
your
profile pic?
Posted on 2/18/15 at 2:42 pm to BoominHogtown
quote:
who
is
that
in
your
profile pic?
The newest member of the First National Darth_Vader Spank Bank.
Posted on 2/18/15 at 2:43 pm to Wtodd
google "Warren Jeffs" and the "FLDS" and you will see why it is illegal...true polygamists in Utah/Arizona area are basically cults...they mistreat these women and the children...teenage boys and young men are kicked out of communities where they were raised with no real education while the old guys marry young girls....it's sick and twisted and evil...
Posted on 2/18/15 at 2:44 pm to Darth_Vader
Posted on 2/18/15 at 3:02 pm to Goldrush25
WTF would anyone want to; remember 5 wives= 5 mother-in-laws....................
Posted on 2/18/15 at 3:17 pm to Jarlaxle
Jesus Christ of LDS, what species is that creature on the right end?
Posted on 2/18/15 at 3:27 pm to Wayne Campbell
quote:
That's a straw-man argument. The crux of support for gay marriage isn't morality, it's spousal rights. And most every spousal right is legally provided to parent-child relationships.
That's not really a straw man but that's one hell of a Slippery slope fallacy which are usually even dumber
Posted on 2/18/15 at 3:36 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
That's not really a straw man but that's one hell of a Slippery slope fallacy which are usually even dumber
Wrong. It's called precedent. By allowing men to marry men and women to marry women, a precedent has been set that the definition of marriage is very much open to interpretation. If marriage cannot be limited to one man and one woman, then on what basis can it be limited? How can you tell three women they cannot be married when you've already allowed two of them to get married? And if you allow three women to marry would it not be discrimination to deny the same right to two women and one man?
Posted on 2/18/15 at 3:50 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
No, I don't see that ever becoming legal as there is no way for an animal to give it's consent.
trained parrot?
Posted on 2/18/15 at 3:50 pm to Wtodd
don't care if someone else does it... but can't imagine having more than one wife in my ear all day.
and imagine when their cycles "synch" up.
and imagine when their cycles "synch" up.
Posted on 2/18/15 at 3:54 pm to TheBoo
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/2/16 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 2/18/15 at 4:37 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
No, I don't see that ever becoming legal as there is no way for an animal to give it's consent.
So you don't need a cow's consent to chop it up and serve on a toasted bun, but you need its consent to share a life of love?
Posted on 2/18/15 at 4:41 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Just about any outlandish union you can think of will be possible. For example if a mom wants to marry her grown daughter, what's the argument to stop them? Hell, if she wants to marry multiple offspring, both sons & daughters, there will be no valid argument left to stand in their way.
Faaaaalllllsssseeee.
Strong public policy within almost every state in the Union to prevent incest.
Posted on 2/18/15 at 4:44 pm to Darth_Vader
Breesus is going full law student who decided to read once last semester in this thread 
Dropping out stuff like "890 usufruct" and "marriage legally sanctions and encourages childbirth" up in hyah.
Dropping out stuff like "890 usufruct" and "marriage legally sanctions and encourages childbirth" up in hyah.
Posted on 2/18/15 at 4:45 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
Faaaaalllllsssseeee.
Strong public policy within almost every state in the Union to prevent incest.
They also prevented gay marriage as well until recently. That's no longer the case. The precedent of marriage being more than just one man and one woman has now been set. Like I said above, once you expand the definition of marriage to being more than just one man and one woman to where it can be two men or two women, then on what basis can you deny that same right to three men or three women (or more) irregardless of their familial status?
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News