- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Polygamy.....what's your opinion?
Posted on 2/18/15 at 4:46 pm to Dale Murphy
Posted on 2/18/15 at 4:46 pm to Dale Murphy
quote:
So you don't need a cow's consent to chop it up and serve on a toasted bun, but you need its consent to share a life of love?
A)
B) A life of love in a typical "man to livestock" relationship is fine, but not in a romantic sense.
Posted on 2/18/15 at 4:46 pm to Wtodd
I always thought it would be horrible with the double dose of nagging. But what if they bitch to each other and leave you alone. Is it possible this is how it works? If so, Bravo, Mormons.
Posted on 2/18/15 at 4:47 pm to Aux Arc
Does anyone know what on earth that dude in "Sister Wives" does to be able to prop up four wives and a bagillion children?
Posted on 2/18/15 at 5:14 pm to Prosecuted Collins
I make my wife wear that Polygamy Porter shirt out in public...she resents it until she's had a few.
(you should have shown the colorful back too)
(you should have shown the colorful back too)
Posted on 2/18/15 at 5:48 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Wrong. It's called precedent. By allowing men to marry men and women to marry women, a precedent has been set that the definition of marriage is very much open to interpretation. If marriage cannot be limited to one man and one woman, then on what basis can it be limited? How can you tell three women they cannot be married when you've already allowed two of them to get married? And if you allow three women to marry would it not be discrimination to deny the same right to two women and one man?
I don't think you understand what the "precedent" said.
This is an equal protection issue. Without valid justification, you cannot deny equal protection under the laws. There's a valid justification for not allowing people related by less than 4 degrees marry. There isn't any valid justification (in the court's eyes) for not allowing two men or two women to marry.
Posted on 2/19/15 at 9:23 am to LakeViewLSU
I don't care if it's illegal or not. That's my opinion chief.
Posted on 2/19/15 at 9:36 am to Tornado Alley
quote:
Does anyone know what on earth that dude in "Sister Wives" does to be able to prop up four wives and a bagillion children?
I think you answered your own question but the show itself is the answer
Posted on 2/19/15 at 10:07 am to Wtodd
I think it's a great option if the personalities match up: extra set of hands for helping around the house and with the kids, extra personality for hang outs, and not too mention having and extra vaj around.
I could see it being cool. But emphasis on the personality requirement.
I could see it being cool. But emphasis on the personality requirement.
Posted on 2/19/15 at 10:31 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
[O]nce you expand the definition of marriage to being more than just one man and one woman to where it can be two men or two women, then on what basis can you deny that same right to three men or three women (or more)..?
Math.
I don't personally have a problem with it, but your analogy is strained.
Posted on 2/19/15 at 10:46 am to Wtodd
Why would anyone WANT more than one wife?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News