Started By
Message

re: Picture of a space shuttle leaving Earth, taken by NASA

Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:56 pm to
Posted by MrBobDobalina
BRo.LA
Member since Oct 2011
2991 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:56 pm to
you don't know shite
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29450 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 12:37 am to
Tilt shift/abnormally shallow depth of field makes everything look tiny.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 5:57 am to
Not taken by NASA. Taken by a guy in an airliner through the window.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84755 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 6:13 am to
quote:

Not taken by NASA. Taken by a guy in an airliner through the window.



No clue if you're serious, but you wouldn't think an airplane could even get close enough to a launch to snap this picture. I mean I understand they're not exactly close, but still closer than you'd imagine they're allowed.
Posted by JimMorrison
The Peninsula
Member since May 2012
20747 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 6:23 am to
Look at all that pollution contributing to global warming. Thanks Obama
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
22053 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 6:47 am to
I bet heather is stroking out over that gigantic chemtrail.
Posted by GeeOH
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
13376 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 7:29 am to
We're they taxed on the CO2 emissions?
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 7:30 am to
The type of fuel they use doesn't emit co2
Posted by eddieray
Lafayette
Member since Mar 2006
18022 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 7:31 am to
Wow, there's a lot of guessing going on in this thread.
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
9349 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 7:36 am to
Very nice. Here is another of my favorites.

Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
9349 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Not taken by NASA. Taken by a guy in an airliner through the window.

This

Here's a video of a launch taken from a plane.

LINK
This post was edited on 4/7/16 at 7:43 am
Posted by htownjeep
Republic of Texas
Member since Jun 2005
7612 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Not taken by NASA. Taken by a guy in an airliner through the window.



No clue if you're serious, but you wouldn't think an airplane could even get close enough to a launch to snap this picture. I mean I understand they're not exactly close, but still closer than you'd imagine they're allowed.
It is very possible. The airspace varies I have been told but it is usually in the 20-30 mile range around KSC and usually below 20k feet. I'm sure someone else on here will know much more detail, but this is just some stuff one of my neighbors had told me.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89493 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 7:52 am to
quote:

The type of fuel they use doesn't emit co2


Yes it does. Liquid fuel combustion of the shuttle's main engine emitted carbon dioxide and water vapor - harmless of course and only considered "pollution" because of the incessant drive to add additional, unjustified taxation on energy - but emitted nonetheless.

And, keep in mind a shuttle launch burns the equivalent of about 2 minutes of gasoline consumption of the United States. That's pretty staggering.
Posted by white_mj
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
460 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 7:53 am to
quote:

quote:
I could watch videos of those launches all day long. Bad arse...

LINK




Was really hoping this was actual cool videos......nope just youtube. You got me sir
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
9349 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 8:04 am to
quote:

airspace varies I have been told but it is usually in the 20-30 mile range around KSC


That's about right... the upper range of that typically for general VFR operations, sometimes up to 40 miles if I remember correctly.
Posted by Large Farva
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2013
8308 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 8:16 am to
In the first youtube video posted the guy states that the boosters are burning 11,000 pounds of fuel per second. The original weight of shuttle and boosters before take off was around 4 million pounds. In 2 minutes after it took off, the shuttle and boosters had already burnt off half of that weight in propellant. That is mind blowing.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 8:28 am to
quote:

No clue if you're serious, but you wouldn't think an airplane could even get close enough to a launch to snap this picture. I mean I understand they're not exactly close, but still closer than you'd imagine they're allowed.


LINK
LINK



It's worth adding that the OP's pic is heavily zoomed, they were pretty far away.
Posted by Large Farva
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2013
8308 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 10:25 am to
Id love to go to space if I was guaranteed to a safe journey up.
Posted by roadkill
East Coast, FL
Member since Oct 2008
1834 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 11:54 am to
A couple of comments:

The picture is not from a commercial airplane - the airspace is closed within that range during launch window except to military aircraft.

At launch, by the time the Shuttle clears the pad, it is traveling more than 100 mph - real acceleration.

A few seconds after launch, the Shuttle executed the "roll program" when it would flip on its back. That was done in order to allow gravity to feed the liquid fuel from the External Tank to the Space Shuttle Main Engines - this eliminated the requirement for fuel pumps.


Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
9349 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

The picture is not from a commercial airplane - the airspace is closed within that range during launch window except to military aircraft.


The airspace is restricted to approx 30 miles. There are plenty of videos of shuttle launches taken from commercial aircraft at that distance or more. This is easily that far away.

quote:

A few seconds after launch, the Shuttle executed the "roll program" when it would flip on its back. That was done in order to allow gravity to feed the liquid fuel from the External Tank to the Space Shuttle Main Engines - this eliminated the requirement for fuel pumps.


Actually each of the Space Shuttle Main Engines have fuel and oxidizer turbopumps. The roll maneuver is performed, among other things, in order to position the shuttle into the proper orbit for its mission. But the turbopumps were key elements to each of the three engines.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram