- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/15/14 at 3:08 pm to Lsupimp
upvote 
Posted on 11/15/14 at 3:09 pm to The Dudes Rug
quote:
This is 100% true. Now if the vehicle is passing in a no-passing zone, that's different.
thank you.
quote:
What part of double-yellow line/no-passing lane don't you understand?
I never said this what true in a no passing zone. In fact, I specifically made that clear in my post.
quote:
This is only true when in a passing zone of course.
LINK
Reading comprehension, try it.
The OP didn't say anything about it being a no passing zone. I was simply stating what the law is where passing is allowed.
Posted on 11/15/14 at 3:09 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
What part of double-yellow line/no-passing lane don't you understand?
I think he was just talking in general. If you are legal able to pass, it is the driver that is turning left's responsibility to make sure the opposing lane is clear before he/she makes the turn.
Posted on 11/15/14 at 3:14 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
but Darwin is coming for your arse soon
In a wreck happening with the event described here, if you and your children are harmed/killed...Darwin would have come for you not him. Especially if he was not killed or if he had children not with him and he was killed...
So, learn what Darwinian fitness is while you're on the internet with this rant and learning about traffic laws.
This post was edited on 11/15/14 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 11/15/14 at 3:15 pm to Sasquatch Smash
Lol pwned.
Posted on 11/15/14 at 3:25 pm to Sasquatch Smash
quote:
Darwin would have come
Thanks for changing the future tense to the past tense to change the meaning of my post. Solid level of dishonest argument there. Congrats.
And Trust me, Darwin is coming for this guy. It's just a matter of when. That wasn't an isolated event. That's how this guy drives. Let's hope it's not you and yours that learn about the whole Darwin thing.
Posted on 11/15/14 at 3:37 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Thanks for changing the future tense to the past tense to change the meaning of my post. Solid level of dishonest argument there. Congrats.
Meh, I can see that being your retort, and it's might be valid. However, you are implying a hypothetical wreck involving you and your children in which this guy was a participant and then related that to his fitness and not yours. So...
Still doesn't change the fact that you are using Darwinian fitness incorrectly.
Also, has Charles Darwin become some sort of boogeyman? I'm sure the intelligent designers are behind this somehow. Ha.
Posted on 11/15/14 at 3:43 pm to Sasquatch Smash
What I did was tell you how he recklessly he drives and explained where that might lead for him. Not too hard to understand. Unless your need to be a pompous contrarian jackass exceeds your need for intellectual honesty.
Posted on 11/15/14 at 3:51 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
What I did was tell you how he recklessly he drives and explained where that might lead for him. Not too hard to understand.
Then why bring up "killing a car full of children" if that was your whole point?
quote:
a pompous contrarian jackass exceeds your need for intellectual honesty.
Speaking of intellectual dishonesty, thanks for the ad hominem attack.
Posted on 11/15/14 at 3:58 pm to Sasquatch Smash
Pompous asshat?
Better?
Better?
Posted on 11/15/14 at 4:08 pm to Lsupimp
The argument was about passing via a legal passing zone and turning left. We all think the OP was not at fault as that was a no passing zone.
It was about the passing zone question that we were arguing about.
Passing zone, left turn guy at fault.
NO passing zone, passer at fault.
It was about the passing zone question that we were arguing about.
Passing zone, left turn guy at fault.
NO passing zone, passer at fault.
Posted on 11/15/14 at 4:10 pm to Lsupimp
Has anyone told you that you'd be at fault for that accident?
You should always make sure no one is passing you when taking a left on a two lane road
You should always make sure no one is passing you when taking a left on a two lane road
Posted on 11/15/14 at 4:12 pm to yellowfin
Indeed.
Posted on 11/15/14 at 10:22 pm to ColdDuck
quote:
Passing zone, left turn guy at fault.
NO passing zone, passer at fault.
I don't know which car Darwin is driving but the above is correct.
Passing some car that is turning left may always be stupid but it isn't always illegal.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News