- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Paris vs London Vs Rome
Posted on 7/17/14 at 11:35 am to BossierTigerFan24
Posted on 7/17/14 at 11:35 am to BossierTigerFan24
Rome
Posted on 7/17/14 at 11:36 am to BossierTigerFan24
Paris is the worst of the 3 outside of the food. London has the most food but the most fun stuff to do outside of just your basic history and landmarks tours. London has a huge theater scene, similar to Broadway in America so checking out some plays would be a fun activity. An Absolute must is a tour of the Tower of London. Also, get a Tube pass. Everything will be easily accessible via the London Underground (subway)
Paris hates tourists, Americans, nonparisian French, Parisian French, everyone. It's basically a city of snobs (think super hipsters without the flannel). Your most fun will be had by ignoring them. Visit the eiffel tower and the louve, have a romantic dinner at a fancy french restaurant and then go out for after dinner drinks at a small jazz club. Have sex in a hotel room with the eiffel tower out the window and you've had a clutch trip.
Rome is weird. It's dirtier than you expect, but it's also really awesome. The people are super nice and really just want to have a good time and get you having a good time. Of course, the Vatican, Trevi Fountain, and Coliseum are must sees, but don't sleep on the Pantheon. The area around the humongous dome (which was the largest in the world for over well over a millennium) is also filled with little restaurants, gelato shops, and fun places to go. The key with Rome is to take a nap in the middle of the day. The Romans wake up around 9:00 to a light breakfast, take a nap until the middle of the day, and sit down for dinner late, around 10:00pm. They then drink, dance, and party all night. Plan your day accordingly so you can enjoy this culture and you'll have a blast.
I would do Rome, Paris, London in that order while stopping at various awesome destinations along the way like Florence, Pisa, Venice, Monte Carlo, and Lyon. London should be last because there's so much to do there. You might want to give yourself extra time (if only to digest the delicious greesy English breakfasts) to explore outside of the city. Bath, Stonehenge, and Edinborough are all worth visiting. Catching an EPL soccer game at Whembly or in Manchester could be fun as well.
Paris hates tourists, Americans, nonparisian French, Parisian French, everyone. It's basically a city of snobs (think super hipsters without the flannel). Your most fun will be had by ignoring them. Visit the eiffel tower and the louve, have a romantic dinner at a fancy french restaurant and then go out for after dinner drinks at a small jazz club. Have sex in a hotel room with the eiffel tower out the window and you've had a clutch trip.
Rome is weird. It's dirtier than you expect, but it's also really awesome. The people are super nice and really just want to have a good time and get you having a good time. Of course, the Vatican, Trevi Fountain, and Coliseum are must sees, but don't sleep on the Pantheon. The area around the humongous dome (which was the largest in the world for over well over a millennium) is also filled with little restaurants, gelato shops, and fun places to go. The key with Rome is to take a nap in the middle of the day. The Romans wake up around 9:00 to a light breakfast, take a nap until the middle of the day, and sit down for dinner late, around 10:00pm. They then drink, dance, and party all night. Plan your day accordingly so you can enjoy this culture and you'll have a blast.
I would do Rome, Paris, London in that order while stopping at various awesome destinations along the way like Florence, Pisa, Venice, Monte Carlo, and Lyon. London should be last because there's so much to do there. You might want to give yourself extra time (if only to digest the delicious greesy English breakfasts) to explore outside of the city. Bath, Stonehenge, and Edinborough are all worth visiting. Catching an EPL soccer game at Whembly or in Manchester could be fun as well.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 11:53 am to BossierTigerFan24
You really don't need that much time in Paris. I would recommend doing a London trip and jumping on the White Star and doing Paris for a day or two. Do Rome on a trip of it's own.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 11:56 am to jmarto1
My dad gave me this picture when I elft for college that I still have framed in my house. It's a pic of Hitler standing at Napoleon's tomb after the Nazis invaded Paris. I always thought it as neat, but then to go stand in the exact same spot this picture was taken and where Hitler stood was one of the cooler things I have ever experienced.
This post was edited on 7/17/14 at 11:59 am
Posted on 7/17/14 at 11:57 am to BossierTigerFan24
Skip them all.
Amsterdam
Amsterdam
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:00 pm to kingbob
quote:
Paris hates tourists, Americans, nonparisian French, Parisian French, everyone. It's basically a city of snobs
i'm willing to bet that you acted like a jackass. My experience in Paris was 100% the opposite, the people were super friendly and helpful. Almost obnoxiously so.
The key is to make an effort to speak french, even if it's a bad effort. I bet you made no such attempt and went all ugly american around town. Thanks for giving us a shitty reputation
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:05 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
i'm willing to bet that you acted like a jackass. My experience in Paris was 100% the opposite, the people were super friendly and helpful. Almost obnoxiously so.
I agree 100%.
I mean, I didn't like all the panhandling by the eiffel tower or the aggressiveness of the street vendors at Sacre Couer or the Trocadero, but it isn't like that behavior is typical Parisian culture. .
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:05 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I agree, the French are not rude, but they are blasé, passive, and a bit standoffish toward tourist.
Like you said Ihave found that if you engage them and make an effort to speak their language, they are very friendly.
I only know English and Latin fluently, but every foreign country I go to, I familiarize myself with the basic language. It's very easy and doesn't take long (and it's kind of fun) and it makes your trip a million times better. I don't understand why people don't do that.
Like you said Ihave found that if you engage them and make an effort to speak their language, they are very friendly.
I only know English and Latin fluently, but every foreign country I go to, I familiarize myself with the basic language. It's very easy and doesn't take long (and it's kind of fun) and it makes your trip a million times better. I don't understand why people don't do that.
This post was edited on 7/17/14 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:08 pm to genro
And really it goes double for the poster I quoted because if you tell them you're from fricking LOUISIANA they get all excited and ask you a ton of questions.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:11 pm to genro
quote:
I familiarize myself with the basic language. It's very easy and doesn't take long (and it's kind of fun) and it makes your trip a million times better. I don't understand why people don't do that.
That was my brother. The ex war vet with an iPhone...captain "I'll figure it out"
We took the metro to the Louvre and we heard there was less of a line to buy tickets downstairs than upstairs. So, we were in the metro station curious as to where this ticket place might be.
He walked up the the metro window and in clean englosh said, "Is this where you buy tickets to the Louvre?"
she just nodded and said, "uh-huh".
Then he said, "great, well give me four" (for me, my wife and he and his wife"
She then proceeded to sell my brother four metro tickets to the metro station we were standing at.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:12 pm to BossierTigerFan24
They are all good in their own way. I liked London the best of the three. I'm more a fish and chips in a pub kind of guy than fancy meals. Plenty of history with Churchill's bunker, British Museum, Tower of London, trip out to Greenwich, St. Pauls, etc. I've always been into British humor and music and the people of London are easier to get along with than the Parisians or people of Rome. No language barrier either and it's a shorter and cheaper flight.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:13 pm to BossierTigerFan24
For me it would be
Rome
London
Paris
Rome
London
Paris
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:15 pm to kingbob
quote:
Paris hates tourists
I didn't experience this at all.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:16 pm to LSUfan4444
quote:
the aggressiveness of the street vendors at Sacre Couer
They really push those Heinekens.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:18 pm to LSUfan4444
I'm smarter than your brother and I usually turn my phone off in Europe.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:29 pm to BossierTigerFan24
Vienna ask for the Hitler tour
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:30 pm to BossierTigerFan24
all are awesome. Paris and London are ridiculous expensive and Rome isn't too far behind them.
I liked Rome the best.
And please try a smaller city and do more than 10 days.
I liked Rome the best.
And please try a smaller city and do more than 10 days.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:34 pm to genro
I basically used mine as a camera, then when we got back to the apartment all my pics would go into my photo stream and transfer them to my computer.
I was pretty satisfied how easy wi-fi was to find then by using the magic jack app and facetime it was pretty easy to communicate back home when we wanted to.
I was pretty satisfied how easy wi-fi was to find then by using the magic jack app and facetime it was pretty easy to communicate back home when we wanted to.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 12:34 pm to kingbob
quote:
I would do Rome, Paris, London
I would never consider doing these on the same trip. You would spend all of your time traveling and no time seeing shite.
Paris and London can be paired up pretty easily but Rome and Paris/london aren't exactly close.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News