- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New protest law: would you be for it
Posted on 4/30/15 at 9:25 pm to Uncs
Posted on 4/30/15 at 9:25 pm to Uncs
Ima go ahead and say that it is not that good an idea to bury anyone under more debt than they can ever pay off and then remove their only source of income to buy food...that is, unless you want them crawling in your windows at night to get your food...
0
Posted on 4/30/15 at 9:33 pm to Uncs
quote:
if your on a federal subside
Posted on 4/30/15 at 9:34 pm to shaqtaw
quote:
How about it being legal to shoot these clown dicks that are rioting?
TEXAS:
quote:
Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.
Posted on 4/30/15 at 9:40 pm to shaqtaw
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/20/16 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 4/30/15 at 10:22 pm to Uncs
How bout if you're a banker and frick the worlds economy you have to pay also.
Posted on 4/30/15 at 10:57 pm to Cosmo
quote:
They have no money. How do they pay for damages?
Labor. I understand some may strike and refuse to work but strap them to a wagon wheel and give them some lashings and their work ethic will change
Posted on 4/30/15 at 11:05 pm to Celtic Tiger
quote:
It's practicaly unworkable. Most rioters would be judgment proof inherently. If you stripped their welfare or food stamps, how do you think convicted looters and rioters would respond? Realistically, it's not deciding to eat ramen noodles once a day. And then, you would be holding a guy who kicks over a mailbox liable to the same extent as one who burns a building, which is not fair either way
This. It's only rational if you have direct evidence of a certain person and the exact damage they caused.
Posted on 4/30/15 at 11:08 pm to Cosmo
quote:
They have no money
Do they have healthy organs? Where there is a will, there is a way.
Posted on 4/30/15 at 11:10 pm to Uncs
quote:
or your parents check!
Posted on 5/1/15 at 12:06 am to Uncs
ok....as an addenda to that legislation, lets make it when a cop murders someone we turn him loose in the hood.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News